[GenManagerS]

Disclaimer: this is simply not a line to talk about the quality of development. It's a scientific concept that's reinforced by more than 95 of biologist. Posts by Abdul Fattah, Nuh Ha Mim Keller or Harun Yahaha (because of Bilal Philips, don't believe we're likely to see him getting used anymore) won't change the quality of it and many have now been refuted. Moving forward. There's a Muslim, his understanding of the deen and his informed in science is typical. He reports biology and understands the proof for evolution is overwhelming and doesn't find many refutations acceptable and sees them vulnerable. What must he do? A) Take the view of students that are not understanding of technology (or weren't about at the time of Darwin's thought) but quite knowledgeable of the deen. or B) Decide to try and combine both like several modernist did today. Does that imply a non-Muslim (who're conscious of Islam) won't always visit hell for disbelieving, If Your? It appears to me that science and Islam struggle and science represents a sizable part in the lives of non-Muslims, I will not realize why Allah might then still expect non-Muslims to come quickly to Islam? Technology is the study of the world. Allah is meant to depart signs however technology involves results such as for instance development depending on proof. Can you join a faith which clashes with research? Most likely not, you discount that faith as false. Certainly Allah then may sympathise with non-Muslims? PS, don't tell me about the technology in the Qu'ran or fictional wonder of the Qu'ran since the former is unclear and a situation of individuals turning words to suit a plan and the latter is subjective. Please just answer the problem above and nothing else.