LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-13-2010, 09:28 PM   #1
Natashasuw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
I agree with you Dave. I was just pointing out that it is always important to see who is writing an article or doing a study.
Natashasuw is offline


Old 11-03-2010, 05:28 AM   #2
Galvanoidum

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default Newer stem cells flawed. Embyonic cells appear stronger.
http://www.telegram.com/article/2010.../1002/business.
Galvanoidum is offline


Old 12-02-2010, 09:27 PM   #3
Barryrich

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
609
Senior Member
Default
"A limitation of the study is that it did not use iPS cell lines that were created without viruses, said Jacob Hanna, a post-doctoral researcher in the laboratory of Rudolf Jaenisch at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research in Cambridge."


I think the above statement taken from the article is an important one. The company involved is working on technology that would use iPS cell lines created without viruses, therefore, they are looking to find fault with iPS cell lines that are not created that way. Just my opinion, but that's how I read it.
Barryrich is offline


Old 12-03-2010, 01:19 AM   #4
AndreasLV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
492
Senior Member
Default
Pluripotent Adult Stem cells that are created using a virus are not suitable for human use in my opinion and again in my opininion clinics who use adult stem cells derived from skin, liver, etc should be able to show that they are not using virus induced stem cells for transplantation.
David
AndreasLV is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity