[Sthjrderfida]

I was reading an article and well it is true...but its very shocking. I mean what in the world was going on. How could ONE man decide the fate of thousands of others. Its rather insane.
While i spend a lot of time complaining about the war in Iraq, well this article is making me think of what it did do well. (cuz i dont wanna think that we were stupid to let one person go ahead and destroy the world).

Since Iraq ia almost at a civil war (not quite and i hope they dont get there) but do you think if the US and others hadnt gone to Iraq, do you think the civil war would have not happened. am i making sense?

[9mm_fan]

i think yes, the civil war they are facing is most a religious one and yes, im sure it'd have gone ahead even if US troops werent there. These people who fight wars on religious grounds lack thought anyway, whether this or that they'd have still done it. However, I wonder how the Iraqi Government'd have handled it tho, im sure it'd have been way different if it wasnt the coalition government and i guess it'd have been better for the Iraqis to just focus on the war (to find a solution) but right now its just a total chaos, no one knows whats going on, there isnt any strong government. Kinda like France after Robespierre

[Sthjrderfida]

on the same note i think its funny that they spend all of school teaching us about the american revolution, the french revolution, this war that war blahblah just hoping we'd learn from them...but.