[cigsstorenick]

i can't get the math thing to work so i'll have to post my comment here.

good stuff, the science of peace mp3's are excellent!

i'm starting to think that mccain will be replaced as he has very little chance of winning. if you look at the political candidates on digg.com you'll see that obama has ten times more followers than mccain as just one example. i saw rudi recently on a morning show, still saying 9-11 in every other breath, and it made me think that a trial balloon was being floated. my guess is that we'll start to see potential republican candidates start popping up in the news, even taking the spotlight away from mccain.

[jokilewqs]

for the same reason i'll jump in here too.

obama being a positive bit of catalyst in the now does not a president make. it just means he is good for social conscious change in this here and now. and not being in "their" pocket doesn't mean he isn't being played in a game much larger than he.

another misgiving i have is this - if "they" are so concerned about obama because he isn't under "their" reign, how did he proceed to get "their" media coverage when ron paul, whom they apparently truly feared, was successfully removed from the race, and from the opportunity for his message to have reached the public, by that same bought and paid for media?!

sure, i can see a wave of positive energy occurring around and because of obama. but i'm not sure it has much to do with him.

and no more than ron paul could will barack obama be able to enter the veritable juggernaut of american government and politics and cause substantive change.

it is an amazing political situation, but i still can't help but feel it is somewhat trivial, that there is much bigger game afoot, and all this presidential hoo-hah is just a twig snapping distraction in the midst of the big hunt!

so, yeah, i've got some serious doubts, but - i've got no problem being wrong when it's for the better, so may i be totally whack about all of this!!!

love, blessings, and abundance,

frank-o

[BruceQW]

hi!

agree, esp. the comment about ron paul...

liliane the transit

[Juersdodfs]

i also could not get my post to show up on the blog so i guess i'll chime in on this thread too.

anyway i agree with david on most things but i strongly disagree with his obama views. in one of his radio interviews he referred to obama as "bloodless", indicating that he has no relation to the elite bloodlines. well i hate to burst that bubble but obama's lineage was traced and he is in fact a distant cousin of both bush and cheney!! look it up i'm not kidding, even the msm reported on it.

now i don't know about you guys but that is a huge red flag to me.

[XiWm9O9S]

in fact, most people with some european descent will be found to be distantly related, if you go back several centuries. most europeans can trace their lineage back to the european royal houses, as well.

so we perhaps may want research this issue before attaching too much significance to it.

mark

[griddle]

leo zagami says that he knows for a fact that obama is a 33rd degree mason, but this doesn't mean he is a slave to his programmers.

as we know, there are lots of illuminati who want to get out, who want to change things, who have resisted negative polarization despite their adversarial situation.

you have to realize that obama is not a radical. ron paul was rejected not only by the media but by the general public for being too radical. most people are simply not thoughtful or intelligent enough to honestly consider his ideas. this is ok, this is not a big deal.

obama is not radical, but he's also not a warmonger. if mccain is elected the american people are consciously choosing war with iran, and that will have karmic consequences for the whole country. if obama is elected, the people are choosing a much more level-headed approach and that would be a rejection of the bush-style of government.

i don't think it's about the leader as much as it's about the public. if the public has not yet learned its lesson from the bush administration and chooses 4 more years of "obvious dynasty", then more bad things have to happen until the public figures it out. if the public has decided it has had enough, then things can start improving.

the loss of hillary to me represents the rejecting of dynasty. if the us had gone that way, they would be de-facto supporting a hereditary system of government. george h.w. bush was running the us from 1980-92 as vp to the senile reagan, then clinton for 8 years, then another bush for 8 years, and if america picked another clinton it would be embracing hereditary rule.

so in those senses all of the election news has been nothing but good. that is - mccain and clinton both being less popular than obama is good news for where the public stands.

ron paul's campaign was a success because he spread his ideals, but it was always highly unlikely that the public would turn on a dime and actually embrace paul. he changed the debates and he changed the stances of other politicians and the preferences of americans and so it was a successful campaign. at the moment it's a big enough step for america to choose an anti-war candidate. you have to remember that there was initially wide support for the 2003 iraq war and this is not just a problem with bush, this is an indictment on the general public as a whole.

[DailyRingtone]

leo zagami says that he knows for a fact that obama is a 33rd degree mason, but this doesn't mean he is a slave to his programmers.

i don't know if this eases his free masonary affiliation, but up to the 33rd degree, masons are not illuminati. after the 33rd degree their are 13 levels of illumanati. this is my understanding from my current experiences. also, not all in free masonary are of negative polarity.

i can say that free mason's up to the 3rd degree tend to be loving folk, but as a former free mason put it "there is corruption and evil in every group be it masonry or not."

[jokilewqs]

i wish i could depend on our election process to actually represent what the people truly want, but i think the evidence of at least malfunctioning electronic voting machines (if not down-right tampered with to adjust the vote counts) makes it a bit of a moot point. for mccain or obama to get elected isn't actually going to represent to me a reflection of where the people are really at, but rather just the virtual vote count.

the presidential election is like shopping for a new breakfast cereal. ultimately what is chosen is the most aesthetically pleasing box that claims it will provide us with the greatest nutritional benefits. once we get it home though, we find it to be the same old flakes, soggy two minutes after the milk hits them, just like the last box, and the box before that.

besides that, out of the whole aisle of boxes you can only choose between two of the cereals.

but, gosh, golly, it sure is exciting for a while, the anticipation of change, of something new!

i'd agree, it appears we are rejecting the apparent dynasty of the bush/clinton clan. huzzah! one of my main concerns is that in the rush and fervor to accomplish just that the people might be willing to accept anything, and when something looks as good as obama it feels great to jump on the victorious bandwagon. but...is it the thing to do, just because? wouldn't the illuminothings and whoever know the people will be aching for change, and, faithful as a grandfather clock, ready to swing the pendulum all the way to the other side? wouldn't they load the deck? (need i mention pelossi and the democratic congress and the lack of any real change they provided after everyone was so gung-ho to get a democratic edge in the government?!) and like i said before, not in the pocket doesn't mean not being used.

but, blah blah blah. quite frankly, i don't shop the boxed cereal aisle. i get granola out of the bulk section. as wonderful as it is to hear from a source such as david that he doesn't see dark clouds around obama (and still allowing that i could be totally wet on all of this and barrack is the man!), i have to do something else he has advised us all to do, and that is to use our own discernment. mine keeps telling me that, fabulously shiny and ornate though it may be, obama would just be a hood ornament on the front of big-a** cadillac running hard with only half a quart of oil in the crankcase.

now, please pardon if this seems negative as far as posts go. i realize i don't hold the same opinion that many here seem to, and so many apparently feel within these united states, that barack is a good thing. don't be mistaken that i feel he is a bad thing though either. he's just another thing. just another president.

how many presidents have really done anything to advance your consciousness, except in the lessons they help to provide within the scenarios they participate in creating? i think we must make sure we have the cart and horse in order. no president will change or advance our consciousness', but every one ends up as a reflection of our collective consciousness and its educational, evolutionary needs.

what do we still need to learn? that is what we will get, be it obama, mccain, or some surprise unperceived at this point.

which means, i guess, that all the candidates are equally useful, or "good" because they cannot help but provide the catalyst we need. which is where, while all this sounds kind of negative, it is all positive. president's don't do anything, they're just tools that we can use for our soul education. with luck, perhaps barrack is just the monkey-wrench we need to throw into the machine! who knows.

love, blessings, and abundance,

frank-o

[BruceQW]

well yossarian, that's so true...we have the leaders we deserve, reflecting the level of the collective consciousness....

liliane the transit

[kertionderf]

for anyone who's still questioning obama's intent, in today's news obama is giving a lecture infront of a statue for war in berlin. (that's how this news article reported it) but look at the statue more closely. you see the back is turned to obama, it looks like war god is running away from him, not backing him up.

and then if you want to read how they sell you the fear:
http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2...rlin-backdrop/

and then here's another article today that even goes into his note to god controversy and shows the statue at the bottom in more detail so you can clearly see the statue going away from obama.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/a...%27/article.do

[DailyRingtone]

i think something is going to happen before the election that is going to tip the scales one way or another in a big way. i do think it is going to put a kink in the plans of the negative elite and things will not go their way.

as dw has said in a few of his postings, their system is falling apart. they don't even know how bad it is falling apart (the eu is auditing the federal reserve). as it has been said in many channelings and ufo books, evil (negative polarity) eventually destroys itself. just watch as the system falls apart on its own. it is a good lesson.

their third density consciousness is falling apart along with ours. the whole ascension time table does not just affect sto but sts. any sts can change to sto. all can be havested sto. it is not impossible, improbable maybe, but not impossible.