[xquFzpNw]

i was wondering what david wilcock predicted happening on this date? is there any articles? was he right in a way? was he wrong?

[prmnwoks]

well nobody is perfect, and david is human, after all, so he's probably entitled to miss one every now and then. that's why it's so important to be in touch with your own inner feelings. that being said, perhaps the original title of this website might give you a clue (ascension2000.com)

in "the reincarnation of edgar cayce?" wynn free writes "... he is not always right. for example, he predicted a calamity on january 1, 2000, regarding y2k, which never came to pass...

... perhaps, according to david, his subconscious mind was highly swayed by constantly listening to the art bell radio program at this time, where an endless stream of guests, both scientific and psychic-oriented, were convinced that society was about to collapse...

... it is also for this reason that david has put together a scientific case for ascension, so that even if all intuitive works are completely discredited, regardless of who brought them through and when, a solid scientific model still exists..." i think this is important in that it helped guide him more in the direction of scientific evidence, which coupled with his strong intuitive ability makes for a very compelling case for all his viewpoints.

[xquFzpNw]

thanks for the info. but i was all so wondering if he always spoke of the ascension happening in 2012 or did he start saying 2012 after the year 200 and y2k was suppose to happen? did he know know about the ra material before the year 2000?