Reply to Thread New Thread |
01-05-2008, 10:01 AM | #1 |
|
i understand where your coming from.
my son is a seventeen year old in the middle of studying for his college exams (one of which is psychology where this question originated) and, to quote,"i don't believe in that ra stuff(used another word here beginning with cr) anyway, there aren't any aliens its all imagination." 17 year olds know it all don't they? peace and love to you yusuf |
|
01-05-2008, 12:16 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 01:05 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 02:30 PM | #4 |
|
|
|
04-28-2008, 09:53 PM | #5 |
|
greetings to you all,
my son and i were discussing the dark side of peoples nature. he asked me," if the infinite creator is pure love and light, where did the dark force originate?" i'm afraid i was at a loss as to how to answer this question in a satisfactory manner. is there anything in relation to david's work and the information from ra or seth that would provide an answer to his question in words that a 17 year old would understand, ( and a 64 year old for that matter)? my love to you all yusuf |
|
04-28-2008, 10:54 PM | #6 |
|
if i recall correctly, i think ra said something to the effect that the negative polarity didn't exist near the center of galaxy and didn't come into play until a logos such as our sun more towards the edge of the galaxy chose to add the veiling process to 3rd density to quicken the pace of evolution ..i would have to do some searching to find the exact session
peace, mikey |
|
04-28-2008, 11:20 PM | #7 |
|
in a very simple way; love(wisdom) would be the "light" side of duality and on the other hand light(knowledge) would be the "dark" side. they are two sides of the same coin so to speak. hope this is not too confusing. it might become clearer if you have a chance to study duality.
i would also like to add that from my perspective, the light(knowledge) is "darkened" by the ignorance of love(wisdom).............sylvain............... |
|
04-29-2008, 12:05 AM | #8 |
|
hi yusuf,
separation.... i believe that all “bad named” thing comes from the separation from its source, well it is never really apart, otherwise it would cease existence right away…. if we consider source in it’s most essential meaning…. so, i believe that the separation feeling and consequences are just part of the learning. because in the non physical perspective there cannot be a “bad” thing, once we are eternal and indestructible, the only “bad” is – by logic – the “forgetting ness” of that…. and even that, can be seen as a good thing, if we think of the eternal, things could get very “boring” if we didn’t have created this environment of forgetting to learn from by experiencing everything…. to be honest, i have learned all this from the material we find in here, i think that david talks a lot about separation being a “good” thing in regardless of the appearances; it must be seen as a bigger picture. david’s project camelot videos (the first - four part - ones); yes i’m sure you will find the perfect words to explain to you son after watching them. com amor lala |
|
04-29-2008, 03:18 PM | #9 |
|
greetings to you all,
o.k. first let me thank you very much for your input to my question. the impetus you gave me to search has given me some answers. the way i see it now is that, at the dawn of creation, there was just the one pure consciousness. all was one with the creator. no sense of separation. then, the act of creation brought into existence the negative and positive forces. then a veil or curtain was drawn separating the pos/neg forces from the pure light. the separation. the pos/neg forces then subdivided through the various densities until the first density. although we have both pos/neg they are of the same primal substance and both have the desire to return back to the one pure light. it is this desire that bonds all that is created. everything ever created has this desire for love, peace and happiness which can only be found with the one creator. even the the 'dark' negative side has this desire to return to the one. it is this desire that forces us back through the densities back to the pure light of the creator. to finally overcome the prime separation. have i got it right? i offer you peace and love yusuf |
|
04-29-2008, 04:14 PM | #10 |
|
alchemikey if i recall correctly, i think ra said something to the effect that the negative polarity didn't exist near the center of galaxy and didn't come into play until a logos such as our sun more towards the edge of the galaxy chose to add the veiling process to 3rd density to quicken the pace of evolution ..i would have to do some searching to find the exact session that's a pretty cool idea actually...it feels "right" to me.
i'm looking through some sessions and i'm finding the idea of a logos creating a galaxy to be really fascinating. then it subdivides into star systems, then planets, then into people. so we're just energy from that logos but several steps into individuation. i think that's an important concept, how individuation and "division" can lead to distortion, which in this context could be considered the "dark side" or sts. but, the engagement of this distortion with the "purer" vibrations we understand as sto would produce radically powerful resonances a soul could experience, learn from, and tap into to fuel its evolution up the "chain of command" as logoic stewards/guides of soul groups, planets, star systems and galaxies. it's like learning what your favourite food is by having a banquet infront of you. if only one dish was infront of you, how would you truly know? where would the fun be in that? it's all about finding that joy in the cosmic opera we're all apart of |
|
04-29-2008, 05:23 PM | #11 |
|
good morning folks. as i have contemplated the process of cosmosgenesis over the years, i now view the human soul group as an experiment of the individuation on our planet, that has been allowed to play itself out through various levels of density, in preparation for a launch into greater levels of consciousness that could not occur otherwise. a teacher friend of mine spoke of this as the luciferian experiment that has been unfolding across aeons as we count 3d time, brings about the spiritualization of matter. he based his understanding on his viewing of the akashic records . in his book, [please pm for book and author if interested] does an admirable job of presenting a working model of this in a simplfied form. you can easily check this out, as there are innumerable faucets to gain insight into this process. its interesting that we use the term," cradle of civilization" as i see that we are about to enter maturation as a race which is really a blend of many soul groups literally making us a united nations of souls in a galactic context.
|
|
04-30-2008, 05:22 AM | #12 |
|
a seventeen-year-old should be able to understand just about anything you throw at him. you could just refer him to the ra material.
or you could simply show him that darkness doesn't exist; all darkness is is the absence of light. just like "cold" is only an absence of heat. we name these concepts as if they exist, and then, due to the naming, forget that they don't. thus "darkness" or the "dark force" did not originate anywhere. it doesn't exist. if i have my thoughts straight, this is why ra prompts us to look at the negative path with some amusement: the whole arrangement is based on a lie; based on what what does not exist. i hope that helps. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|