LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-30-2008, 01:25 PM   #1
Imihooniump

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default Devices and machinery of speech = matrix
the following is a resume of my understanding until now.

i have been wondering about the structure of language itself, and the issues that come with its use. understanding that “what we think and speak is not the effect of that we experience… but the cause” is primordial to get out of the drama.

language is “binary machinery” in its function, in other words, the polarization is the basis of it. ex: we can only understand and put a meaning to one word, once we recognize it as being different from all the others. and if we don’t know one word, it can be “anything”, until we match a previous signification to it, what somebody teaches us that it is. (for those who have learned a foreign language knows, the feeling of surprise, when the meaning of a word is too different from what we felt it was before learning it).

in brief, i have been wondering the language as a living organization, and it’s unfolding as the major trap for the unknown, known for language (in our thoughts) as fear and its variations – separation.

if we want to bring oneness to conscience, one eye, thinking in terms of language must be kept out of the way. meaning, we must not find the meaning, in other words, staying in the unknown implies stepping out of the polarity of the meaningful language.

and, for now, i conclude that language is matrix itself.
Imihooniump is offline


Old 03-30-2008, 06:17 PM   #2
rJohutozsfds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
ra-session 71 the nature of your language is such that what is distorted cannot, to our knowledge, be fully undistorted but only illuminated somewhat. ra-session 90 it has been our supposition, which we share with you as long as you are aware that this is mere opinion, that our logos was interested in, shall we say, further intensifying the veiling process by offering to the third-density form the near complete probability for the development of speech taking complete precedence over concept communication or telepathy.
rJohutozsfds is offline


Old 03-30-2008, 06:20 PM   #3
lorrieholdridge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
too bad we all don't study general semantics as that has been lauded to be one of the most effective disciplines to explore if you wish to communicate more effectively. (just google general semantics if you are curious)
lorrieholdridge is offline


Old 03-30-2008, 07:46 PM   #4
Sertvfdnhgjk

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
from one story that i heard, we would communicate telepathically. we had no speach. until a certain event happened. but that is one point of view. i feel we will transend speach and learn to communicate with our minds and our hearts.
Sertvfdnhgjk is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity