[cheapphenonline]

dear friends,

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-10-9/60546.html

be well, be love.

david

the history before history, part i
by leonardo vintiñi
epoch times argentina staff oct 09, 2007

impossible fossil: the fossil of a trilobite—a sea arachnid that became completely extinct 280 million years ago—was found in a human shoe print. photos.com

it was a hot night so a man decided to take a walk along the beach. soon after setting out, he felt a soft crunch under his foot. he stopped to inspect the soles of his shoes in the moonlight, and scraped off the remains of the unfortunate creature he had squashed. unconcerned, he continued his stroll, unaware that the footprint had immortalized the end of that tiny life. after all, what's so strange about stepping on a trilobite?

approximately 320 million years ago, a species of small lobed creatures began to populate earth's seas. these relatives of sea arachnids—similar to lobsters and crabs—once flourished but became completely extinct 280 million years ago. we are talking, of course, about the trilobite.

the human being, as it is currently accepted by the majority of scientists, appeared as a species no more than 2 or 3 million years ago. and the history of man such as he is known today does not exceed 10,000 years.

with these dates in mind, we can conclude that the story of the human stepping on a trilobite belongs to the category of science fiction. a human being could never have squashed a creature that became extinct millions of years ago, and even less so a person with shoes—an unequivocal indication of civilization. this is evidence which defies history—an impossible fossil.

[Effopsytupt]

it doesnt state what the carbon dating for this fossil was. i wonder if there are inconsistenies there also.

[cheapphenonline]

dear friends,

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-10-20/60988.html

be well, be love.

david


the history before history ii: vestiges of a lost technology
by leonardo vintiñi
epoch times argentina staff oct 20, 2007

just how old is the human race? while figures vary slightly, modern anthropological and genetic studies confirm a similar length of time. yet the existence of hundreds of apparently isolated artifacts do not fit into this standard narrative. some of these findings even question the true origin of modern human technology, while offering valuable clues into the profound mystery of the origin of our species and our science.

one example of these technological curiosities that stubbornly refuses to fit into the conventional timeline of history is an ancient electric battery found in baghdad. the 2000 year-old artifact was sitting in a museum when an australian archeologist discovered its true purpose. this ancient battery consisted of a yellow ceramic container with copper cylinder, twelve by four centimeters, found inside. the cylinder featured a soldered seam composed of a 60/40 mix (the same tin/lead ratio used to solder today) and a copper cover, and it was sealed with a material similar to asphalt. another asphalt-like layer sealed the inner section, with an iron rod suspended in the center. the rod revealed evidence of corrosion from an acidic substance. a reconstruction of this battery demonstrated that it could produce comparable voltage to that of a modern battery. but what would such a device be used to power 2000 years ago? at that time, this area was part of the parthian empire. evidence suggests that this technology did not originate in this area, but more likely in egypt, where many finely-coated silver objects have been unearthed.

[cheapphenonline]

dear friends,

http://en.epochtimes.com/news/7-10-26/61239.html

be well, be love.

david

the history before history part iii, the ica stones
by leonardo vintiñi
epoch times argentina staff oct 26, 2007

a considerable historical controversy arose in the 1960's when stones were found in a cave in ica, peru. the majority of archaeologists and paleontologists have seemingly quelled the debate by asserting that the markings on the ica stones constitute a genuine fraud. but as with all controversial subjects, what hasn't been definitively proven still leaves room for possibility and scientific rigor. for in the realm of science, nothing can ever be affirmed or discarded without conclusive evidence.

while there are reasons to believe that the famous stones are not of pre-colombian origin, there exist several stories as much in favor of their authenticity as there are against it.

a good number of scientists, who have had the opportunity to study the ica stones, observe that they are engraved with an incredible variety of scenes that speak of either an alternative history, or a fertile imagination. for example, the stones depict men and dinosaurs in the same era.

[illignocearia]

articles from epoch times.