[mesZibeds]

Is the Real Time Zone truly as its name implies, the "REAL TIME" zone? If I entered it, would I be able to see people in the physical going about their business and later confirm somebody doing something or having a conversation with a friend?

[DuePew]

No, the Real Time Zone as Robert describes it is an energetic copy of the physical world. When you have projected you are not using your five senses to do your perceiving, you are using your energy to discern what is there, so your perception of the physical environment is based on the feedback your energy body gets from the part of the physical (ie. it's energetic frequency, if you will) that it's interacting with.
To top it off, when you're in the RTZ chances are you're close to your physical body, which also gives feedback, making your perceptions susceptible to distortion.
However, it's as close to the 'real world' as it gets, unless you dubdivide your experiences down to 'etheric', which would be as close to the RTZ as you get.

[gamblingstats]

"Real time" doesn´t exists. Time is only our illusion. Maybe we haven´t to die, if we can astraltravel some years in one moment on physical plane, assuming consciousness depends on something physical(like body) or relatively material. If not, we are absolutely neverending type of existence, so it is no problem. Everything depends on our abilities, trust yourself.

[DuePew]

"Real time" doesn´t exists. Time is only our illusion. Maybe we haven´t to die, if we can astraltravel some years in one moment on physical plane, assuming consciousness depends on something physical(like body) or relatively material. If not, we are absolutely neverending type of existence, so it is no problem. Everything depends on our abilities, trust yourself.

Dear Psychotronic: The original poster is not asking about the validity of the term 'reality'- this is a concept that, as interesting as it is, is besides the point of the question. He is asking about the relationship of his perceptions to the physical. Please do not derail this thread into a philosophical discussion of what reality is. There are other subforums more appropriate for this.
Thanks, Admin

[gamblingstats]

I think, that I answered to the question and I didn´t write anything besides the question. I think, that I answered to his relationships to the physical.

Finally, do you think, that there is something on this forum, what is not appropriate for philosophical discussions? I am confused now.

[DuePew]

Is the Real Time Zone truly as its name implies, the "REAL TIME" zone? If I entered it, would I be able to see people in the physical going about their business and later confirm somebody doing something or having a conversation with a friend?

He is asking how the RTZ relates to physicality. Your reply, "Real time" doesn´t exists. Time is only our illusion. Isn't in relation to the question, it is a proclamation about what 'reality' is. It didn't fit into the context of the question, because he wasn't asking what 'real' or 'time' was. There are other threads dedicated to this theme.
do you think, that there is something on this forum, what is not appropriate for philosophical discussions? The point isn't whether philosophical discussions are appropriate- the issue is whether they derail the thread, as in this case.

[gamblingstats]

If I want to know, what "Real Time Zone" is, I must know, what "Real Time" is. It is a philosophical question, so it needs philosophical answers...
There are no other answers, maybe somebody answered to this question, but so he must answer to all philosophical questions, nobody can do that.

[DuePew]

Once again, you are missing the point. I'm not going to derail this thread any more than it has been. If you want to explore the reality of the physical world, you are free to do so, by starting your own thread. I am locking this one until I hear from the original poster. If he wants the thread to go on this tangent I will open it again.