LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-02-2005, 10:28 PM   #1
Vodonaeva

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default Wikipedia needs your feedback about astral projection
Some people are trying to put useless adjectives that a biaising the neutrality of the article on astral projection.

Anyone that wants to participate is free to do so.

The wiki community would appreciate it.
discussion (about adjectives in wikipedia for the astral projection article)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Astra ... _Wikipedia

astral projection article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astral_projection

Thanks for your participation

for now the current debate is if we should say

Astral projection (or astral travel) is the interpretation of out-of-body experiences achieved either consciously or via lucid dreaming, deep meditation, or use of disassociatives, like DXM, LSD, Psilocybin or 5-MeO-DMT. Proponents of astral projection maintain that their consciousness or soul has transferred into an astral body (or "double"), which moves free of the physical body in a parallel world known as the astral plane.

or
Astral projection (or astral travel) is the controversial interpretation of out-of-body experiences achieved either consciously or via lucid dreaming, deep meditation, or use of disassociatives, like DXM, LSD, Psilocybin or 5-MeO-DMT. Proponents of astral projection maintain that their consciousness or soul has transferred into an astral body (or "double"), which moves free of the physical body in a parallel world known as the astral plane.


imho "controversial" is a useless comment that influences the reader.
Vodonaeva is offline


Old 11-02-2005, 11:48 PM   #2
GitaraMoya

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
In my opinion you can't call it "Controversial" becuase a large community of dedicated, real people have proved it's existence, however i believe you should say something about the other planes of existance becuase you make the immpressino that there is only ONE plane and there isn't there are atleast six :-P
GitaraMoya is offline


Old 11-03-2005, 03:29 AM   #3
evalayCap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
And on a side note, there is a huge difference between consiousness and soul. This a debate on it's own tho.

IMHO, consiousness is a property, soul is an entity.

Just my take on it tho.

Regards,

Jeroen
evalayCap is offline


Old 11-03-2005, 03:41 AM   #4
Preorbtat

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
wikipedia = user contributed. Anybody can write, alter, rewrite etc. It is reviewed tho, and revertable.
Preorbtat is offline


Old 11-03-2005, 04:14 AM   #5
Tactattcahhaw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
Hmmm I'm going to make a few minor changes I think...

-Stu
Tactattcahhaw is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity