[nAKMzyBN]

Everyone's ideas about what an, AP, LD & waking existence is depends on what they think about living in general, and also depends from the general values of times. Their understandings rely on the things they think the planet is, because many of these are subjective experiences. So it's not surprising that everybody regards all the above as different manifestations of the same, and others as different activities altogether. The knowledge of the trend I've also depends upon what I think the truth is about, but I believe numerous people in this community share it or some thing similar. And here it is: Living generally is dynamic in character. This really is consistent with the most recent scientific findings concerning the world as it is known by us ( think we ). Thick medium-wavelength power is what we see as matter. Different perceived power is perceived as such, such as light. There are more and more greater wavelength lower (or low )-density energy that people can't understand, but may calculate a proven way or other, like x-rays, uv, (and large wavelength( reduced freq) no-density energy like infrared) and there are other methods energy interacts with itself, as in emf, etc. Quite simply, what we consider subject is clearly power. This isn't speculation, this is accepted medical principle. Therefore now here come the metaphysical interpretations of the worldview that I (and others) came up with: As subject exactly the same way we exist, we exist as power. We exist as energy that expresses itself in a variety of way (our anatomies are substance and also produce or contain greater frequency energy). Therefore the metaphysics here contain our tones, spirits and awareness. It's the concept that we are able to move our consciousness (or link it to) that nonphysical portion of ourselves, call it an body, or anything you wish to, that exists or links to nonlocality and places of area that occur out of our physical bodies (like energy fields- 'fields of consciousness '). When we AP, OBE or Dream (articulate or not) we're linking our awareness to information that exists out-of the body, both through the body itself (such as for instance information from our unconscious that came from our senses) or through an energy field that we've created or attached to that allows us to obtain information from energetic surroundings that we can only just access as energetic creatures (add other activities, like multidimensionality, quantum advances, etc.). Then when you separate the Astral Planes, the RTZ and Physical truth, it surely a department that's done solely subjectively as 'places, locations, focuses,planes' that differ in the manner we are able to access them. But the huge difference isn't important, but in the manner it exhibits. Hoping the above mentioned was clear enough, I'll plow on: The accepted notion that desires are what our minds do when our conscious mind is 'off' and the unconscious mind is working full tilt has often made sense to me, except for the occasional data that is available in that seems to not came from the physical senses. Therefore I think that (nonlucid )dreams are only that, but that the knowledge that the synapses are rolling out contains information that originated from a non-local atmosphere, if you like to call that to them, combined subconscious, etc.) (Akashic documents. What exactly concerning the separation of the Astral Planes and the RTZ? Properly, IMO these are variations depending on similarity to the perceptual worlds, with the thought that their 'frequency' gets higher because they move away from the perceptual world. So the RTZ, which is definitely an nearly similar lively 'backup' (I choose appearance) of the perceptual threedimensional world, could be nearer to it than Astral Planes (or Focus of awareness, or locations, etc.), which as they get less 'like' the perceptual world, the 'greater' in frequency (or shorter in wavelength) they get. Obviously this bit is purely theoretical, and it's centered on extrapolation in the world, therefore I am unsure what I consider that. However for the sake of clarity and homogenity I'll choose it. The concept of a lucid dream is truly an, since when you dream your waking consciousness is either 'off' or 'elsewhere ', and yet as you become lucid your consciousness begins to understand whatever you're thinking and therefore either notice or be a part of with no body waking up. The fundamental distinction between a clear dream and a projection in to the astral planes is that in a projection there's the experience of 'planning' there, of being moved to the location, rather than 'getting up ' to the dream. Quite simply, the huge difference is of (I daresay) view, centered on what recommendations you may be the principle that I've chosen to check out, and choose to distinguish between an projection and a clear dream. Today an OBE is a different experience: Inside it you end up actually from your body, occasionally have a sensuous connection with having a 'kind of ' body, and you communicate in a purely dynamic model of-the real life, rather than a dreamscape. The seeming lack of communication between various experiencers' meaning of what's actually going on on an IMO displays on how they see themselves when because state. As somebody who has had tons of OBEs of the RTZ typ-e, I may say that I don't connect to my environment in-the sense of having the ability to change it, apparently showing that's of another 'denser' phrase than my very own power human anatomy, yet somehow I do get physical perception of it, such as for instance feel and visual feedback. Now just how can my energy body obtain these inputs? That's where the huge difference of opinion lies. If you believe that the RTZ is just 'concrete' (but we all know it's not) then you may believe that you're going right through the true real wall, and not a dynamic copy of it. But when you think (when I do) that what my energy body is open to the extremely dynamic section of the wall, which exists both as contaminants and as waveform relationships indicating as issue, then you understand that the difference is purely subjective. And that's why I've plumped for my very own methods of making the distinction, since there is no true distinction, only of belief. So it's all an Projection, including LDs, but I actually do not consider LDs as forecasts until there's a particular sensation of 'going there.' Quite simply, each one of these men are appropriate, based on their own a few ideas. For Robert Bruce's suggestions with this, move to: http://www.astraldynamics.com/tutorials/?BoardID=65