LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-15-2011, 03:17 PM   #1
velichay

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default SD: Justified Homicide to Kill Abortion Providers
A law under consideration in South Dakota would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus—a move that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. The Republican-backed legislation, House Bill 1171, has passed out of committee on a nine-to-three party-line vote, and is expected to face a floor vote in the state's GOP-dominated House of Representatives soon.

"The bill in South Dakota is an invitation to murder abortion providers."
The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Phil Jensen, a committed foe of abortion rights, alters the state's legal definition of justifiable homicide by adding language stating that a homicide is permissible if committed by a person "while resisting an attempt to harm" that person's unborn child or the unborn child of that person's spouse, partner, parent, or child. If the bill passes, it could in theory allow a woman's father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion—even if she wanted one.

Jensen did not return calls to his home or his office requesting comment on the bill, which is cosponsored by 22 other state representatives and four state senators.

"The bill in South Dakota is an invitation to murder abortion providers," says Vicki Saporta, the president of the National Abortion Federation, the professional association of abortion providers. Since 1993, eight doctors have been assassinated at the hands of anti-abortion extremists, and another 17 have been the victims of murder attempts. Some of the perpetrators of those crimes have tried to use the justifiable homicide defense at their trials. "This is not an abstract bill," Saporta says. The measure could have major implications if a "misguided extremist invokes this 'self-defense' statute to justify the murder of a doctor, nurse or volunteer," the South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families warned in a message to supporters last week.

http://motherjones.com/politics/2011...tion-providers
velichay is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 04:27 PM   #2
AlexanderPalamayr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Even if it passes, I'd have to think that would be vetoed.
AlexanderPalamayr is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 04:33 PM   #3
JOR4qxYH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
That's bizarre. I mean, you'd have to actually barge in on the doctor while performing the abortion, wouldn't you?!? You couldn't just say "Well, she has an appointment for next Tuesday..."? Some states really do need to seccede.
JOR4qxYH is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 04:37 PM   #4
DexOnenlyCymn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
That's... I think my brain just exploded.

Especially by the idea that it passed the first hurdles.
DexOnenlyCymn is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 04:41 PM   #5
Gromiaaborn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Disgusting.
Gromiaaborn is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 05:16 PM   #6
CedssypeEdids

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
692
Senior Member
Default
I got nothing.
CedssypeEdids is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 05:16 PM   #7
new-nickname-zanovo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
There's no possible way it could ever become a law, but what a bunch of assholes.
new-nickname-zanovo is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 05:43 PM   #8
CedssypeEdids

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
692
Senior Member
Default
The governor's biography states:

Dennis became involved in politics in 1996, when he defeated a Democratic incumbent, and was reelected by wide margins in 1998 and 2000. His legislative record was particularly focused on protecting children, helping the disabled, and getting tough on crime. For what it's worth.
CedssypeEdids is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 06:49 PM   #9
Gromiaaborn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
I've a question here. Since abortion is a federal legal procedure....and since doctors who perform aboritons can be targeted simply on this basis...killed exactly for that...isn't this a hate crime?

If so..wouldn't a law like this be...nullified? Sort of? You all get what I'm saying...

Because if abortion doctors are NOT protected...watch out, this law very well may pass.
Gromiaaborn is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 07:14 PM   #10
Kamendoriks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
That's bizarre. I mean, you'd have to actually barge in on the doctor while performing the abortion, wouldn't you?!? You couldn't just say "Well, she has an appointment for next Tuesday..."? Some states really do need to seccede.
That was my first thought.

How can something be legal (abortion) and also the murder of someone performing that legal act?

Let's give South Dakota to Canada.
Kamendoriks is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 09:16 PM   #11
JOR4qxYH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
That was my first thought.

How can something be legal (abortion) and also the murder of someone performing that legal act?

Let's give South Dakota to Canada.
F that. Just build them a giant wall. Everybody wins.
JOR4qxYH is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 09:20 PM   #12
gimffnfabaykal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
They could not be serious.
gimffnfabaykal is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 09:32 PM   #13
JOR4qxYH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
I've a question here. Since abortion is a federal legal procedure....and since doctors who perform aboritons can be targeted simply on this basis...killed exactly for that...isn't this a hate crime?

If so..wouldn't a law like this be...nullified? Sort of? You all get what I'm saying...

Because if abortion doctors are NOT protected...watch out, this law very well may pass.
I doubt it. I've never heard of something being termed a hate crime based on the career of the victim. From your fave: "Race, religion, or nation origin", and "gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability" are the only ones I've heard of.

Hopefully it gets nullified because it's... oh, what's the word I'm looking for here... oh, right. MURDER!
JOR4qxYH is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 11:09 PM   #14
broksaksaak

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
565
Senior Member
Default
Hopefully it gets nullified because it's... oh, what's the word I'm looking for here... oh, right. MURDER!
I think that may be the exact point that they are trying to make, putting out a bill that they know won't pass because they can turn the logic around on those who oppose it. No, wait, I'm giving them way too much credit. I've just gone crazy. I blame Barbora Zahlavova Strycova.
broksaksaak is offline


Old 02-15-2011, 11:33 PM   #15
Ettiominiw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
697
Senior Member
Default
They need to introduce a bill making it justifiable homicide to kill a person that introduces a bill making it justifiable homicide to kill an abortion doctor.
Ettiominiw is offline


Old 02-16-2011, 12:20 AM   #16
BruceCroucshs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
718
Senior Member
Default
That was my first thought.

How can something be legal (abortion) and also the murder of someone performing that legal act?

Let's give South Dakota to Canada.
No thanks!!
BruceCroucshs is offline


Old 02-16-2011, 03:15 AM   #17
Kamendoriks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
LOL. Please?
Kamendoriks is offline


Old 02-16-2011, 03:23 AM   #18
TughEmotteTug

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
No thanks!!
Seconded.

You are stuck with South Dakota.

I really am speechless over this.

Although I'm politically slightly left of center, I acknowledge that a reasonable debate can be had with the right.

The U.S. right wing is truly odious though. I wouldn't even know how to speak to these people.
TughEmotteTug is offline


Old 02-16-2011, 03:29 AM   #19
squeerisott

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
423
Senior Member
Default
Seconded.

You are stuck with South Dakota.

I really am speechless over this.

Although I'm politically slightly left of center, I acknowledge that a reasonable debate can be had with the right.

The U.S. right wing is truly odious though. I wouldn't even know how to speak to these people.
You can't speak to most of them because they failed Listening 101 and are not willing to take the remedial classes.
squeerisott is offline


Old 02-16-2011, 04:24 AM   #20
Kamendoriks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
You can't speak to most of them because they failed Listening 101 and are not willing to take the remedial classes.
And that's a wrap.
Kamendoriks is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:19 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity