Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Ariz House: Check Obama's Citizenship
POSTED: 7:15 pm MST April 19, 2010 UPDATED: 10:23 pm MST April 19, 2010 PHOENIX -- The Arizona House on Monday voted for a provision that would require President Barack Obama to show his birth certificate if he hopes to be on the state's ballot when he runs for reelection. The House voted 31-22 to add the provision to a separate bill. The measure still faces a formal vote. It would require U.S. presidential candidates who want to appear on the ballot in Arizona to submit documents proving they meet the constitutional requirements to be president. Phoenix Democratic Rep. Kyrsten Sinema said the bill is one of several measures that are making Arizona "the laughing stock of the nation." Mesa Republican Rep. Cecil Ash said he has no reason to doubt Obama's citizenship but supports the measure because it could help end doubt. http://www.kpho.com/news/23202195/detail.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I realy wish someone would answer this question.
Whether or not there is any credence to the "birthers" arguments (and I think they're wrong, but regardless) - has anyone ever questioned that Barrack's mother was a United States citizen? And therefore, isn't he a US citizen no matter where he was born? |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
I realy wish someone would answer this question. -both parents must be American -or if only one of them is, he/she must have lived in the US a certain amount of years, some of them after the age of 14. Under the current law, if both parents are US citizens and are married, then the child is a US citizen if either parent had a "residence" in the US at any time in his or her life prior to the child's birth. There is no specific minimum period of time in the law for how long a parent must have been in the US in order for his/her status to be accepted as having been "residence" in the US. If one parent is a US citizen, and the other is not, and the parents are married, then the current law says the child is a US citizen if the American parent was physically present in the US for one or more periods of time totalling at least five years, at some time or times in his or her life prior to (but not necessarily immediately prior to) the child's birth. Additionally, at least two years out the required five years of physical presence must have taken place after the parent's 14th birthday; thus, for example, a parent who was born and grew up in the US, but who left before reaching age 16 and never returned, doesn't meet the requirement. http://www.richw.org/dualcit/law.html#CitByBirth oh, and for the second time today, I'm just speechless. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
I realy wish someone would answer this question. Here's what Wikipedia has about this on Obama:
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
What's so aggravating is that his birth certificate has been available all along. But like so many other things with these people, they believe if you say a lie enough times it becomes fact.
(Of course, in the state of Arizona, they also want Hispanics to carry their proof of citizenship with them at all times or risk going to jail. But that's a different subject for a different thread.) |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Ariz House: Check Obama's Citizenship ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
What's so aggravating is that his birth certificate has been available all along. But like so many other things with these people, they believe if you say a lie enough times it becomes fact. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|