Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
so why should america host it again after 16 years?....its been 44 years since a proper football nation like england hosted it,its not in living memory since uruguay hosted it.....and as for emerging nations i think the aussies would get my vote |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
so why should america host it again after 16 years?....its been 44 years since a proper football nation like england hosted it,its not in living memory since uruguay hosted it.....and as for emerging nations i think the aussies would get my vote ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
you stated earlier that it was a world game......the world plays the game.....no one nation should have a monopoly on hosting the world cup The way the US national team played this past World Cup is the reason there's so much hype in America about soccer. We want to be the best at everything |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
I didn't say anything about monopolizing it, I'm saying sign a petition to have a major US city host it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
Well, there are actually a number of cities in the states that could pull that off ![]() I think they were just poking fun at me because they think I assumed that all the matches are held in one stadium |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
with a population of 9 million, it wouldnt affect it much |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
LA has at least half a dozen stadiums big enough for a football pitch and about 50,000 spectators? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|