LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-24-2010, 08:35 PM   #1
ThekvandoVideo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default What exactly is "Creation Science"?
I've been hearing about "Creation Science" for over 30 years now... but no-one has ever defined exactly what it is.

Is there anyone out there who can (finally) give me a clear, concise and unambiguous definition of "Creation Science"?





I only want serious replies... but since I am open to the possibility that there is no definition that is clear, concise and unambiguous, I know that the only possible answer(s) could be silly.
ThekvandoVideo is offline


Old 04-25-2010, 03:25 AM   #2
beth

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
334
Senior Member
Default
I've been hearing about "Creation Science" for over 30 years now... but no-one has ever defined exactly what it is.

Is there anyone out there who can (finally) give me a clear, concise and unambiguous definition of "Creation Science"?
There is no clear definition, because the phrase is contradictory. It is, plainly stated, what it says: science that aims to prove that the earth was created.

See the problem? It starts with a conclusion, then seeks out the facts to support it. That runs totally counter to the scientific method.

While I won't go so far as to say it's not science, it's pretty much a recipe for really crappy results. While there are a few genuine thinkers doing original work in the field, most are simply trying to poke holes in evolution (a tactic that, even if successful, does nothing to further the argument for creation).
beth is offline


Old 04-25-2010, 07:13 AM   #3
XqrkN4a0

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default
I know that the only possible answer(s) could be silly.
The lord works in mysterious ways
XqrkN4a0 is offline


Old 04-25-2010, 03:08 PM   #4
GuitarLoverBe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
I'm going to simplify my answer to your question , about 10,000 years ago a guy in the sky with a beard and a robe worked for 6 days creating the earth and populating it with 2 people . The rest as they say is history . Oh and then he took a nap and we have been killing each other in his name ever since . Seems reasonable to me .
GuitarLoverBe is offline


Old 04-27-2010, 04:01 PM   #5
Glipseagrilia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
I can sum up creation science in one word:

Oxymoronic

(For a shorter, equally accurate definition, lose the "oxy.")
Glipseagrilia is offline


Old 04-27-2010, 09:51 PM   #6
Amomiamup

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
You'll buy that a virgin gave birth to a god who was killed and reborn as a zombie before disappearing.

But evolution?

Heretic.
Amomiamup is offline


Old 04-27-2010, 11:14 PM   #7
ZIZITOPER

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
It's like devout athiesm.
ZIZITOPER is offline


Old 04-28-2010, 12:58 AM   #8
vipbunter

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Only nobody in that field's atheistic.

You have to demonstrate your worth as a True Believer before you're even accepted into the field.
vipbunter is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity