Reply to Thread New Thread |
04-24-2010, 08:35 PM | #1 |
|
I've been hearing about "Creation Science" for over 30 years now... but no-one has ever defined exactly what it is.
Is there anyone out there who can (finally) give me a clear, concise and unambiguous definition of "Creation Science"? I only want serious replies... but since I am open to the possibility that there is no definition that is clear, concise and unambiguous, I know that the only possible answer(s) could be silly. |
|
04-25-2010, 03:25 AM | #2 |
|
I've been hearing about "Creation Science" for over 30 years now... but no-one has ever defined exactly what it is. See the problem? It starts with a conclusion, then seeks out the facts to support it. That runs totally counter to the scientific method. While I won't go so far as to say it's not science, it's pretty much a recipe for really crappy results. While there are a few genuine thinkers doing original work in the field, most are simply trying to poke holes in evolution (a tactic that, even if successful, does nothing to further the argument for creation). |
|
04-25-2010, 03:08 PM | #4 |
|
I'm going to simplify my answer to your question , about 10,000 years ago a guy in the sky with a beard and a robe worked for 6 days creating the earth and populating it with 2 people . The rest as they say is history . Oh and then he took a nap and we have been killing each other in his name ever since . Seems reasonable to me .
|
|
04-27-2010, 04:01 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|