[ephennaCypota]

Could this be the atheist’s equation: 0 X 0 = ∞. English interpretation: "Nothing times Nobody equals everything."

[PHOTOSHOPoem]

They didn't teach me that in freemason indoctrination course. But I haven't payed into the higher levels yet.

[Duaceanceksm]

Could this be the atheist’s equation: 0 X 0 = ∞. English interpretation: "Nothing times Nobody equals everything."

Hahaha, those wacky atheists!!!

Now do the one for where God came from!

[Boripiomi]

Could this be the atheist’s equation: 0 X 0 = ∞. English interpretation: "Nothing times Nobody equals everything."

Short answer: No.

[soryalomop]

aww, did someones other thread get locked cause he couldn't play by the rules, and so had to come start a new one?

Also, if you want to be honest, this is also your theory on your god. However, the idea that our universe is simply part of a larger series of multiverses is more rational than your 'imaginary man who has always existed' idea.

At the very least, if you don't have to explain your eternal imaginary man, we don't have to explain the origin of the universe. However, while your side simply takes his existence as gospel, our side continues the quest for an answer. That is why your side always loses ground, and our side always gains it. That has not changed in 150 years, and will not change in the future.

[VotsUtegems]

Could this be the atheist’s equation: 0 X 0 = ∞. English interpretation: "Nothing times Nobody equals everything."

Damn, I thought it meant "nothing times nothing equals crueller."

And I do love me some cruellers. So I must be an atheist.

An atheist in search of a big cup of coffee with 2 percent milk to go with my cruellers.

[Nautilus]

Could this be the atheist’s equation: 0 X 0 = ∞. English interpretation: "Nothing times Nobody equals everything."

No, it couldn't.

[MikeGotTalentz]

Could this be the atheist’s equation: 0 X 0 = ∞. English interpretation: "Nothing times Nobody equals everything."

Somebody just learned how to type the special characters on their keyboard! Well done!

Here's another:

Ō + π =

English translation: Holy zero plus pie equals happy badger.
Now that's something I can believe in.

__Jason

[eduptultyt]

Ō + π =

English translation: Holy zero plus pie equals happy badger.
Now that's something I can believe in.

__Jason

that is actually far more coherent than just about everything humber has ever posted.

[Opperioav]

that is actually far more coherent than just about everything humber has ever posted.

Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' Badgers.

We need cruellers.

[bebeacc]

Short answer: No.

However, 0-0=0. And remember, Billy Preston played with the Beetles, who were more popular than Jesus, so the underlying theology must be sound.

[MegaJIT]

Is this guy senile or wacko?

[gennnniiikk]

Only on the internets do people poke those whom hear voices with sticks

[ziIReIGS]

Is this guy senile or wacko?

If a crueller falls in a deserted coffee shop, does it make a sound?

[formobilagsw]

Hey, Bob Head, that's BeAtles. But I had the same "nothing from nothing" going through my head so you may be forgiven your slip.

I thought Humber was merely giving a summary of his posts on the Creation Science thread- nothing times nothing for all eternity (or so it seemed).

[Savviers]

Hey, Bob Head, that's BeAtles.

Now that I am working again, my days are spent checking my spelling. Since I hate bring my work home, checking my spelling off the clock is a thing of the past.

[JosephEL]

I always thought OXO was the first computer game. Or some really well-made kitchen tools. But "everything" also has a nice ring to it.

[escolubtessen]

Is this guy senile or wacko?

Yes.

And a teacher at the Haverford School. Scary, ain't it?

[anaisdannyxys]

Math for fundamentalists...

[c6vkuNRg]

I always thought OXO was the first computer game. Or some really well-made kitchen tools. But "everything" also has a nice ring to it.