[bikersfan]

Go to Creation Science thread

[WaysletlyLene]

Go to Creation Science thread

Why?

[PRengine]

Why?

For a good laugh?

[Gscvbhhv]

O we're there Paul.

[lopaayd]

This video was just recently posted. It concludes with "Dawkins Stumped!" There are perhaps 2 players. Neither is Richard Dawkins, but it does give the actual cite for the real Dawkins near the end. I gave it a “5” rating and also a comment. Enjoy: YouTube - "Richard Dawkins" - like you've never seen him before

I do not plan, BTW, to comment further about this, but I strongly suspect that some of you will hold it up for scorn. Scorn away. The actor(s) did a fabulous job, and the view that should be scorned is the one represented by Dawkins.

[CHEAPSOFTOEMONLINE]

haven't watched the video yet, but was he stumped like you were every time as asked you for evidence for creationism, or was he stumped because he was asked an inane question by a creationist and was attempting to phrase his answer at a 2nd grade science level?

[klubneras]

That....that video is just a man interviewing himself. How could anyone watch more than 10 seconds of that? Insanity.

[Peertantyb]

your video was idiotic, creationist drivel that, no surprise, relied on lies and video editing. Add to that the fact that the interview in question took place due to deception, and i think you have a wonderful example of how exactly the creationist movement acts. Lies, on top of deceptions, on top of half truths.

Of course you will not comment further Humber, anything you attempt to say after this will simply be shown to be a lie.

For those of a more reality based worldview, if you want at great response to this entire event from Dawkins, try The Information Challenge | Australian Skeptics

[newpiknicker]

I do not plan, BTW, to comment further about this, but I strongly suspect that some of you will hold it up for scorn.

Didn't you leave? Since you're back, how about answering the question that has you stumped ever since you first popped in there? Can you show us any scientific evidence that supports creation? Even one piece? If not, please just go away and stay gone until you can.

[plaiskegizils]

What a load of sh!t. Humber's gone for 2 weeks and this is the best he can come up with, some idiot talking to himself. Typical Humbag.

[NvrNoNowX]

I do not plan, BTW, to comment further about this Intellectually dishonest coward.

[Thomaswhitee]

This video is hilarious! I love that it takes place in that CGI smoke-scape, like the interview was set at the beginning of an "Unsolved Mysteries" episode.

Forwarding to EIT
Everything Is Terrible!

[reervieltnope]

What a load of sh!t. Humber's gone for 2 weeks and this is the best he can come up with, some idiot talking to himself. Typical Humbag.

I seriously doubt Dumber has been gone at all. The inane ramblings of Seth the Talking Mule share too much in common with Paul's. His appearance coinciding with the exit of our resident denier of reality also is suspicious. Oh well, a horse's a$$ is a horse's a$$, no matter what name it chooses.

[PhillipHer]

This video was just recently posted. It concludes with "Dawkins Stumped!" There are perhaps 2 players. Neither is Richard Dawkins, but it does give the actual cite for the real Dawkins near the end. I gave it a “5” rating and also a comment. Enjoy: YouTube - "Richard Dawkins" - like you've never seen him before

I do not plan, BTW, to comment further about this, but I strongly suspect that some of you will hold it up for scorn. Scorn away. The actor(s) did a fabulous job, and the view that should be scorned is the one represented by Dawkins.

I find it insulting that you are putting forward a debate between a pro-Creation narrator and himself, without Dawkins there in person. When this man had the courage to sit across from Dawkins in person, send me the link, Paul.

Just for those that are unclear, here is what the real Dawkins looks like:
Richard Dawkins photo

[aabbaDE]

I'm particularly offended by the IDIOCY of the phrase "high preist of atheism & evolution." Do you just not get it?! why would the idea of no god NEED a preist? and evolution is a scientific theory, not a god. Its just an insult to all thinking-persons.

[NeroASERCH]

Shhhh. Humber might assume this is Noah’s flood. Be careful when you read Dinosaur origins point to South America | Tampa Bay, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Sarasota | WTSP.com 10 Connects!

“Discovery of a primitive precursor to Tyrannosaurus Rex, some 215 million years old, points to a South American origin for dinosaurs, paleontologists reported Thursday.”

PGH: How do they know it was that old? It had a date-card on it, of course! Don’t even dream of testing it for C14. Our minds are made up! We don’t want to be confused by data-facts!

…"Tawa helps us reconstruct the origins of all the most primitive dinosaurs, suggesting they were likely located in South America," Nesbitt says.

PGH: Oh, “primitive dinosaurs”! Must have been blind ones—or ones that couldn’t walk because the legs hadn’t evolved yet.

The dinosaur, "probably ate anything he got his hands on," he adds.

PGH: Oooo! “probably.” Such powerful science!

“Tawa lived some 215 million years ago….”

PGH: Oh, be sure to brainwash that in. Repeating it over and over again helps children believe it. Don’t you know that if you say it enough, you might start believing it!

“…the first dinosaurs from about 230 million years ago found in South America.”

PGH: Sure, all these bones have dates on them. Didn’t you know that! Say it again, bro!

“The fossils fill in evolutionary gaps to later "theropods", the two-legged, upright meat-eaters such as T. Rex, which lived about 80 to 65 million years ago, and today's birds.”

PGH: Wow! That’s quite a gap—from 215-80! That’s 135 million years! A snap of the geological fingers!

"We've got to rewrite some chapters in textbooks, and I have to rewrite my next lecture" says paleontologist Thomas Holtz Jr. of the University of Maryland in College Park. Holtz and some paleontologists had argued that some theropods originated in North America, but Tawa displays clear links to earlier South American ones and to later ones found in Europe, jammed against North America at that time, he now says. "All carnivorous dinosaurs are relatives, this suggests," he adds.

PGH: Wow! That’s more publishing money! Throw out the old books and fill my pockets with new money. Scientists can get rich! Additionally, we can say once more to Humber, “You see, Dummy, that’s the way science happens. It’s self-correcting. Here’s our collective backs. Pat them!

…"no one would have guessed then," that the theropods would later give rise to massive multi-ton killers millions of years later.

PGH: That Humber-guy sure wouldn’t have guessed it! Idiots can’t guess anything—especially if they are lying liars!

“The Tawa finds all likely died in a flood that tangled their bones with other creatures.”

PGH: Ouch! Don’t say that or that lying idiot Humber will get all bent out of shape. We all know that the biblical flood of Noah had to have happened thousands (not millions) of years, but knowing Humber, he’s sure to make that idiotic connection. He might even bring up about that soft, flexible dino tissue stuff. Ugh! We hate it when he reminds us of that stupid, nonsensical nonsense. He himself is the only argument against evolution—because he is a devolved form of an amoeba.

[Kayacterype]

Wow, such insight. You don't sound insane at all Hummie.

[Flefebleaft]

You know what's cool about living in a perpetual state of denial based on fairy tales and fables?














Nothing.

[GueseVekdet]

PGH: How do they know it was that old? It had a date-card on it, of course! Don’t even dream of testing it for C14. Our minds are made up! We don’t want to be confused by data-facts! Here's a "data fact" for you. C-14 has a half life of 5700 years, meaning it can't be used to date anything older than about 60,000 years ago.

[fereupfer]

You need a new hobby, because you certainly aren't any good at proselytizing.