[Dfvgthyju]

Here's incontrovertable proof that the Discovery Institute knowingly uses illegal DMCA takedown notices to attempt to censor opposing viewpoints, and silence people who debunk their misrepresentations.

YouTube - Creationist "Discovery" Institute Busted.

[kaysions]

Isn't that awesome?

It must be in the creationist rulebook: feel free to call someone out on a 'crime' you are also committing. Its hypocrasy yes, but its hypocrasy FOR JESUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[tmobmobfil]

The words Conservative/Republican kinda mean hypocrite to me now.

[illetrygrargo]

Don Exodus seems to have had his feelings hurt. I do not know Casey Luskin, but you can read some words from him here—in U.S.News--http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2009/02/10/darwin-intelligent-design-and-freedom-of-discovery-on-evolutionists-holy-day.html

The problem for Darwinists is obvious: The simplest cell won't function unless this basic machinery is intact, so how does such complexity evolve via a "blind" and "undirected" Darwinian process of numerous, successive, slight modifications?

Even scientists who reject ID admit that neo-Darwinism is lacking. Biochemist Franklin Harold stated in a 2001 Oxford University Press monograph that "there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations." Indeed, over 750 Ph.D. scientists have signed a list declaring their view that random mutation and natural selection are impotent to explain the complexity of life (see Dissent from Darwin).

As we sequence more genomes of species, biologists are also finding that one gene or trait implies one evolutionary tree, while another gene yields an entirely different tree. No wonder the cover of the journal New Scientist recently declared that with respect to his vision of a grand tree of life, "Darwin Was Wrong."

Common descent—the view that all species are related—has also failed to overcome a problem that Darwin recognized in his own day: the lack of evolutionary transitions documented in the fossil record. Instead, what we see are new biological forms coming into existence in "explosions," without clear evolutionary precursors.

Finally, Darwinists have long-argued that our cells can't be designed because they are full of functionless "junk DNA." But in recent years, biologists have discovered that the vast majority of our DNA is performing vital cellular functions and isn't "junk" at all. The wrong-headed conclusions of modern Darwinists have stifled scientific progress and slowed discovery of function for noncoding DNA.

Despite the bluffs of Darwinists, neo-Darwinism has plenty of scientific weaknesses that are discussed in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Since cellular language implies an author, and microbiological machines imply an engineer, and genetically encoded programs imply a programmer, increasing numbers of scientists feel the solution is intelligent design.

Here's incontrovertable proof that the Discovery Institute knowingly uses illegal DMCA takedown notices to attempt to censor opposing viewpoints, and silence people who debunk their misrepresentations.

[Adeniinteme]

Don Exodus seems to have had his feelings hurt. I do not know Casey Luskin, but you can read some words from him here

[Snip off-topic and irrelevant article]

Translation from the Humberese: "I didn't actually watch the video, and have no rebuttal for the fact that the Discovery Institute illegally attempted to censor critics, so I'm going to post a completely off-topic and irrelevant article in an attempt to distract people and change the topic."

Watch: His next trick will be to quibble about how it's not off-topic, etc.