[Petrushkaukrop]

I'd normally agree, but I don't think AC would consider this abuse. At least not where I live. We used to have a neighbor that had a couple APBT and a couple mutts, one large and one small. There were multiple fights in the backyard and a few vet trips as a result. Another former neighbor, sick of the horrible noises of the fights and scared by the blood on the ground and the dogs, called AC. AC came out, asked what happened, got told the dogs fought, were showed records of the dogs being taken to the vet and then they left. According to AC, as long as the dogs have food, water, vet care, and the dogs aren't at large, there is nothing wrong. Nevermind that the dogs could have been prevented from fighting in the first place by some common sense and some kind of reliable system of separation.

They key there is vet care. The law would have allowed the confiscation of the dogs and charging the owner if the owner didn't take the dogs to the vet, but because they took the dogs in there was no cause (legally) to remove them.

:/ They why don't they just legalize dog fighting again since they don't see an issue with it as long as the dogs get vet care? That makes no sense! Its inhumane to allow these dogs to continuously get into fights over and over again. I don't care how many times you take the dogs to the vet. They might as well be holding a private fighting ring in the back hard. AC wouldn't touch them; their dogs get vet care . There are so many loop holes in laws its not funny.