LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-07-2012, 07:13 PM   #1
MarlboroCig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default Bite statistic question.
I was discussing dogs with family yesterday and because of my favorite breed, bite statistics came up. Though many breeds are reported as pit bulls and get documented as such, does the other part of mixes get recorded as well?
If a pit-lab mix bit someone and it was reported which breed does the bite get put under? Pit? Lab? or both?
MarlboroCig is offline


Old 01-07-2012, 08:02 PM   #2
Petrushkaukrop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
584
Senior Member
Default
It would be reported as a pit bull. I hate dog bit statistics.
Petrushkaukrop is offline


Old 01-07-2012, 08:08 PM   #3
viagsjicguara

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
I think it would depend on who is compiling the statistics and what their agenda is.
viagsjicguara is offline


Old 01-07-2012, 09:05 PM   #4
DoctorWeryDolt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
It's impossible to determine the true breed makeup of a dog just by looking at it. Generally, if the dog looks like a bully, it's labeled a pit bull. It doesn't even have to contain a bully breed. They go by looks. And people will call just about anything a pit bull nowadays.
DoctorWeryDolt is offline


Old 01-07-2012, 09:37 PM   #5
Helloheshess

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
I think it would depend on who is compiling the statistics and what their agenda is.
I also think this..
Helloheshess is offline


Old 02-07-2012, 05:56 PM   #6
Gastonleruanich

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
592
Senior Member
Default
If it has teeth and bites someone, its labeled as a pit bull type dog


Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
Gastonleruanich is offline


Old 02-07-2012, 06:11 PM   #7
aburva.org

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
I think it would depend on who is compiling the statistics and what their agenda is.
Seconded.

Recording "mix" bites is hard because some mixes are known to the owner, while others are a guess, or up in the air. I know Roxy's mix because they only had two intact dogs when I went to get her and they had had litters between them before. Sometimes there's multiple possible sires in situations, or guesses as to breed are made solely based on appearance.
aburva.org is offline


Old 02-07-2012, 11:36 PM   #8
MarlboroCig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
So in other words the bite statistics are even more skewed than most realize and do not reflect anything close to reality. It's sad that so many take dog bite statistics (especially insurance companies) so seriously like they are the be all end all authority on the matter. It's nothing more than to perpetuate the fear-mongering of the general public. Most of my family is the mis-guided general public
MarlboroCig is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 12:44 AM   #9
CHEAPPoem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
Stats are even more skewed because there is no central database for reports. Info gathering is strictly voluntary on a national level and not all cities/counties send in data. Also, not all reports made list a breed. So, the info out there is totally incomplete notwithstanding breed misidentification.
CHEAPPoem is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity