[UKkoXJvF]

To the OP. You ask for opinion about a "registry" then get defensive when you do not hear what you want to hear. And you are defending it.

I do not understand why people web ask of they can not handle the answer.

[Xavier_Spinner_Wheels]

To the OP. You ask for opinion about a "registry" then get defensive when you do not hear what you want to hear. And you are defending it.

I do not understand why people web ask of they can not handle the answer.

you know you are right, lol i have gotten all off topic, sorry bout that everyone. i just get a lil frustrated when i am told my dogs are mutts or that there not as good because they arent registered with ginormouse registry thats been around for over 30 years. so, i appologize to those who i my have offended with my ranting. okk back to topic, does anyone believe that the NAPDR may one day be recognized as a legit registry?

[TobaccoNUE]

no

[flueftArete]

no, it will not, any registry that registers dogs of unknown origin is NOT legit, by any means. People typically only use those registries to register mutts as purebreds, or because they don't know any better.

[Xavier_Spinner_Wheels]

no

may i ask your opinion of y u feel that way lee?

[flueftArete]

i forget, only ppl with hugely papered dogs are allowed to breed them because obviously they are the only ones who know anything about the breed. (ie, cause there dogs grandpa had 45 names and its granma had 75) ok back to topic

No, before a dog is bred, the dog needs to be proven worthy of being bred, and seeing has how you don't even know your dogs' lineage, nor are they registered with any legitimate registry, I highly doubt you have done anything to proven that they are worthy to be bred.

[TobaccoNUE]

may i ask your opinion of y u feel that way lee?

Annie pretty much summed it up

[UKkoXJvF]

Make a new thread in the breeder's discussion if you want to talk about his program. This thread is about the NAPDR.

Keep it on topic.

[CO2490pL]

You may not find Bullies but you will find Merles, and even blue dogs with Warchdog/chaos/falin and so forth.

While BFKC is more reputable than CKC. All it is is a database. You send them money and you have a piece of paper saying the dog is pure bred. The only difference is the owner of the BFKC is a well known dogman. But to him it is nothing but a side business that pretty much is pure profit. Only exspences he has is paper, ink, and postage.

This is the case with every registry. Also you mention merles and even blue dogs. Well that's old news when it comes to all the known registries. BFKC is the way to go if you ask me, they definately outclass adba when it comes to registry.

[traithJah]

It is a very reputable registry run by honest individuals who have nothing but the best intentions.They only register dogs off the finest lineage.Of course,as with any registry or kennel club there are a few dishonest members who will submit hung papers.But,as I said this can and does happen with any registry and the staff do their best to find and investigate any suspicious activity.

There you go,is that close enough to what you wanted to hear?

[UKkoXJvF]

This is the case with every registry. Also you mention merles and even blue dogs. Well that's old news when it comes to all the known registries. BFKC is the way to go if you ask me, they definately outclass adba when it comes to registry.

Your opinion. However they loose some creditability with me because they register Merle dogs.

I have 2 dogs that came with BFKC papers. But they also has ADBA. I will not take a dog with BKFC papers alone.

How can they "out class" the ADBA. While yes they still list certain things that others do not. And if so how safe is that. They do not has conformation shows. All it is, is a database. Nothing more.