[tramdoctorsss]

Joined: Oct 21, 2006 Posts: 606 Location: Montreal, Qc. Europe Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:45 pmThank God for Attorneys (Judge in this instance) First and foremost with BRAINS and 2ndly with "Balls" to apply their philosophy. This Judge has been doing more for the American Bulldog Breeder, Owner and particularly admirer in one single jump. When compared with ALL the poor the HSUS and all the other fans attempting to expel this type did within the last 5 years. I wish U can all pass it on therefore more ppl can know their rights. and teach themselves This is a superb choice. Judge Simpson unearthed that the dedication between unaltered and altered pets is without value and which means requirement of examination of enclosures for unaltered pets is unconstitutional, He in addition unearthed that dogs are private property and the necessity of a seizure bond where you have to post a upon a showing of probable cause and if you fail to post the bond your creatures become the home of their state, town an such like. is unconstitutional and a finding of shame should happen before your property can be taken by a court. The An injunction was issued by judge barring the town from enforcing these provisions. Regarding the Fourth Amendment problem the Court ignored it since the town agreed around. Nevertheless, the Court used lots of time discussing the Fourth Amendment and mentioned that however the ordinance appearing to permit for seizure with no cause for tethering violations, for some cruelty problems and for any breach of the ordinance ( a supply utilized by Meloche to catch animals for violations of his supposed Class A needs) the Court reasoned that no ordinance supply nullifies a warrant requirement in order to these seizures LMAS should get yourself a warrant just before seizure. More over, as the Court didn't reach down many of the meanings, it might have just left it at that. As an alternative the Court went point by point and solved the law in regards to what was permissible and what was not. Notwithstanding the account in the "Courageless Journal"- I'm unsure they browse the same view, we'd a significant victory on the problems that matter on a national basis. Please read it a few occasions, it gets better with age. While Judge Simpson didn't cope with the state issue, the professional issue that was the most crucial one, was resolved with a change in veterinary records are made by the state law which confidential and until a court order granted doesn't permit discharge of these or the dog owner gives permission written down. Because we won on our Sec. 1983 issues, Jon may document in a few days for attorney's fees which are obligatory under the law. We're optimistic that we may get a considerable reimbursement. Donna Herzig Tahana Court Documents: http://d.yimg.com/kq/groups/6503560/...Opinion.pdf%3E This can be a crosspost from still another panel, but its all around the internet He succeeded