Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
hi All
I said to my daughter yesaterday that I she was invisible to me. She replied that because I was touching her I could see her and hence she was not invisible to me. I replied that just because I can touch her does not mean that I can see her. She said her brother could see her, which he confirmed. i said you may be visible to him, but you are invisible to me. How can she prove that she is not invisible to me? Kelvin |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
// Does invisibility imply transparency though? Something hidden is still invisible.
Hell no, they are different values of different properties. Values of (visible) or (hidden) apply to visibility of an element, or its overflow. The value of (transparent) applies to properties that can take colour values. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
This thread got me thinking about 'visibility' in general.
So whilst not addressing the question " how can my daughter prove she is visible" I thought of some ways we may not see all that is around us or that we can be visually misled. A part of a recent vsauce youtube video dealt with our perception of colour in the digital world. "http://youtu.be/R3unPcJDbC" Some images here show that things can exist that are normally invisible to us http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...rently-us.html And here is something you can try at home. Stand close to a mirror. Look first at one of your eyes, then the other. Repeat this several times till you are familiar with the reflected image. Now, someone standing beside you watching your eyes would have seen that your eyes were moving left and right. So if your eyes did actually move, how come you only saw a relatively still image. If i underatnd correctly, when your eyes move rapidly the amount of visual data exceeds the brains ability to interpret it So your brain pauses your 'visual memory' and plugs the subsequent hole in your memory with the first image that it can decode. I understand you can lose up to 20 mins a day of 'visual memory' in this manner. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|