LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-24-2012, 02:05 PM   #1
TopcigsCOM

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default Space/Time: Smooth or Quantized?
Spacetime: A smoother brew than we knew
August 23, 2012 By Marcia Goodrich



(Phys.org)—Spacetime may be less like beer and more like sipping whisky.




Or so an intergalactic photo finish would suggest.

Physicist Robert Nemiroff of Michigan Technological University reached this heady conclusion after studying the tracings of three photons of differing wavelengths that had been recorded by NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope in May 2009.

The photons originated about 7 billion light years away from Earth in one of three pulses from a gamma-ray burst and arrived at the orbiting telescope just one millisecond apart, in a virtual tie.

Gamma-ray bursts are short-lived bursts of gamma-ray photons, the most energetic form of light. They can originate far across the universe, and astronomers believe many are caused by giant stars collapsing, often billions of years before the Earth was formed.

"Gamma-ray bursts can tell us some very interesting things about the universe," Nemiroff said. In this case, those three photons recorded by the Fermi telescope suggest that spacetime may not be not as bubbly as some scientists think

. Some theories of quantum gravity say that the universe is not smooth but foamy—made of fundamental units called Planck lengths that are less than a trillionth of a trillionth the diameter of a hydrogen atom. Planck lengths are so small that there's no way to detect them, except via photons like those that make up gamma-ray bursts.

Here's why. The wavelengths of these photons are some of the shortest distances known to science—so short they should interact with the even smaller Planck length. And if they interact, the photons should be dispersed—scattered—on their trek through Planck length–pixilated spacetime.

In particular, they should disperse in different ways if their wavelengths differ, just as a ping pong ball and a softball might take alternate paths down a gravely hillside.

You wouldn't notice the scattering over short distances, but across billions of light years, the Planck lengths should disperse the light. And three photons from the same gamma-ray burst should not have crashed through the Fermi telescope at the same moment.


But they did, and that calls into question just how foamy spacetime really is. "We have shown that the universe is smooth across the Planck mass," Nemiroff said. "That means that there's no choppiness that's detectible. It's a really cool discovery. We're very excited."

With graduate students Ryan Connolly and Justin Holmes and physics professor Alexander Kostinski, Nemiroff coauthored an article on the team's results, "Bounds on Spectral Dispersion from Fermi-Detected Gamma-Ray Bursts," published June 8 in Physical Review Letters.

A story on their work, "Cosmic Race Ends in a Tie," appeared in the news section of the journal Nature on January 10.

Journal reference: Physical Review Letters

Nature Provided by Michigan Technological University




http://phys.org/news/2012-08-spaceti...brew-knew.html
TopcigsCOM is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 02:10 PM   #2
wpFWNoIt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
386
Senior Member
Default
Could this mean that we would "never" be able to formulate a valid QGT?
Or could the Planck length somehow be wrong, and we are further able to sub divide matter/energy.


The research and data that has lead to this result is outstanding.
wpFWNoIt is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 02:10 PM   #3
EspnaConCam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
365
Senior Member
Default
this is pretty interesting. does it effect the likelihood of the existence of gravity waves?
EspnaConCam is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 02:14 PM   #4
K0aM7urg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
this is pretty interesting. does it effect the likelihood of the existence of gravity waves?
I don't think so.
Gravity waves affect space/time on larger scales. The same question that you ask, in effect could be also then asked of the "Lense Thirring" effect and general space/time curvature due to mass/energy I would think.

Again good question.
K0aM7urg is offline


Old 08-24-2012, 02:19 PM   #5
soSldI4i

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
this might seem a little obscure, but it does make me wonder if small is a projection of the larger compound rather than big being an aggregate of the small?

soSldI4i is offline


Old 08-25-2012, 01:34 AM   #6
Ingeborga

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
590
Senior Member
Default
Some theories of quantum gravity say that the universe is not smooth but foamy—made of fundamental units called Planck lengths that are less than a trillionth of a trillionth the diameter of a hydrogen atom. Planck lengths are so small that there's no way to detect them, except via photons like those that make up gamma-ray bursts.

Here's why. The wavelengths of these photons are some of the shortest distances known to science—so short they should interact with the even smaller Planck length. And if they interact, the photons should be dispersed—scattered—on their trek through Planck length–pixilated spacetime.

In particular, they should disperse in different ways if their wavelengths differ, just as a ping pong ball and a softball might take alternate paths down a gravely hillside.
I think this is based on a false premise: that small-scale graininess of spacetime affects space different to time. If small-scale graininess affects space the same as it affects time, as required by Lorentz invariance, then even if different wavelengths of light are affected differently by the graininess, this should not affect the speed of propagation as this would reflect a difference between space and time at small scale, not merely the graininess of spacetime.
Ingeborga is offline


Old 08-25-2012, 01:55 AM   #7
WebDocMan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
I do think that the small-scale structure of spacetime is the greatest mystery as far as a theory of everything is concerned. The foundations of such a theory would depend on the answer to this question so that one is making a very big assumption as soon as one even starts to consider such a theory. My own personal inclination is that spacetime doesn't exist at the Planck scale because any spacetime structure suggests classical physics to me.
WebDocMan is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity