LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-01-2008, 03:46 PM   #1
perpelverw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default Do polar bears need U.S. protection?
Do polar bears, which have become the poster child for the potential ravages of future global warming, need special protection from Uncle Sam now?
That's the question under consideration at the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which is poised to recommend whether the icon of the Arctic should be officially designated as a threatened species – even though the bear's numbers currently are not in precipitous decline.
The judiciousness of protecting the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), in anticipation that its frozen habitat will be thawing as a consequence of climate change, is a matter of hot debate. Do polar bears need U.S. protection? | csmonitor.com
perpelverw is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 04:04 PM   #2
refsherne

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
Yes, and so do every other animal in the world...just kidding...I think we should do what we can for the bears on US land, but I think it's the other countries (IE Canada) responsiblity to protect them on their territory. I dunno....very touchy subject.
refsherne is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 07:43 PM   #3
6ZCo3xuK

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
i'm wondering what the effect would be if polar bears and othe species reliant on ice would be if they were relocated to antartica
6ZCo3xuK is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 07:51 PM   #4
CesseOveldset

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
They'd die....Antartica is colder than the Arctic.
CesseOveldset is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 08:07 PM   #5
idertedype

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
Well, we're probably the reason they're going extinct now, and if so, it should be our responsibility to help keep them from going extinct.
idertedype is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 08:14 PM   #6
mirvokrug

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Well, we're probably the reason they're going extinct now, and if so, it should be our responsibility to help keep them from going extinct.
Who? The United States?
mirvokrug is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 08:15 PM   #7
DoctorTentonyya

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
My opinion is, if we have the resources and the willingness to step in and help then we should.

This is not a political issue, it's nature, and the entire planet has a vested interest in protecting the species that inhabit it.
DoctorTentonyya is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 08:18 PM   #8
ZESINTERS

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default
Who? The United States?
Well, we use more resources than anyone else, so I would imagine it'd be our fault more than anyone else's. Of course, I'm not completely sure. I do know that it's the human race in general that's causing this, that's for sure.
ZESINTERS is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:04 PM   #9
wepoiyub

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Well, we use more resources than anyone else, so I would imagine it'd be our fault more than anyone else's. Of course, I'm not completely sure. I do know that it's the human race in general that's causing this, that's for sure.
There you go, little buddy, realizing that the US isn't the Great Satan like those ignorant Iranians say we are...

How about this for a comprimise: First, we make sure that all the children in our country are fed, clothed and abuse-free. Then we work on the rest of the world. Then we work on cancer and AIDS. Then, if there's money and time left over, we worry about the animals....
wepoiyub is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:17 PM   #10
nmnrIjGB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
356
Senior Member
Default
we both live in capitalist countries so all the kids will never be fed and clothed.sadly thats the price we pay.

and biodiversity effects us all no matter where we live.one species becoming extinct affects lots of other species and forms of life on the planet.

hows about we compromise and make sure all the kids of the world are fed and clothed and abuse free..that would be nice too dont you think?
nmnrIjGB is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:25 PM   #11
SawbasyWrab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
Kids before bears.....
SawbasyWrab is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:32 PM   #12
moohassinny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
554
Senior Member
Default
Kids before bears.....
Then you sir, must join the progressive democrats and battle the evil Republicans....
moohassinny is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:34 PM   #13
MackBranon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
no the planet first because we cant live without it.

and the children of the whole planet not just one country.

or why not both together and irrelevant of borders,we are after all world citizens first
MackBranon is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:34 PM   #14
Lypepuddyu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
huh? Since when has a REpublican done anything for the environment? But for the kid thing, yeah, I'm more middle of the road...started leaning that direction after my daughter was born...kids, they mess you up in the head, man!!!!
Lypepuddyu is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:35 PM   #15
Ternneowns

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
541
Senior Member
Default
no...


men they mess you up in the head kiddo
Ternneowns is offline


Old 07-01-2008, 09:36 PM   #16
Kristoferson

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
no the planet first because we cant live without it.

and the children of the whole planet not just one country.

or why not both together and irrelevant of borders,we are after all world citizens first
The planet will take care of itself, trust me...if we pollute it enough, it'll kill us all off then start anew...

I never said one countries kids over anothers...and I think it's more "everyone is the same race, Human" more so than "World Citizens"...
Kristoferson is offline


Old 08-01-2008, 11:13 PM   #17
DrJonson

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
I personally believe it's all countries responsibility to protect wildlife. However, as far as I know, polar bears do not come from the USA. Surely it's Canada's responsibility to protect them first and foremost? I'm sure the USA have got enough endangered species to protect on their own soil first and foremost?
DrJonson is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity