LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-02-2013, 11:50 PM   #1
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default Mars pebbles prove water history
Scientists now have definitive proof that many of the landscapes seen on Mars were indeed cut by flowing water.

The valleys, channels and deltas viewed from orbit have long been thought to be the work of water erosion, but it is Nasa's latest rover, Curiosity, that has provided the "ground truth".

Researchers report its observations of rounded pebbles on the floor of the Red Planet's 150km-wide Gale Crater.

Their smooth appearance is identical to gravels found in rivers on Earth.

Rock fragments that bounce along the bottom of a stream of water will have their edges knocked off, and when these pebbles finally come to rest they will often align in a characteristic overlapping fashion.

Curiosity has pictured these features in a number of rock outcrops at the base of Gale Crater.

It is confirmation that water has played its part in sculpting not only this huge equatorial bowl but by implication many of the other landforms seen on the planet.

"For decades, we have speculated and hypothesised that the surface of Mars was carved by water, but this is the first time where you can see the remnants of stream flow with what are absolutely tell-tale signs," Dr Rebecca Williams from the Planetary Science Institute, US, told BBC News.
softy54534 is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:52 PM   #2
Slonopotam845

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,251
Senior Member
Default
what if mars is a remnant of a planet like Earth? (living animals, ecosystems, etc) but now extinct
Slonopotam845 is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:52 PM   #3
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
This is exactly why we are putting so much focus on Mars rather than the other planets.
softy54534 is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:53 PM   #4
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
Have we ever gone underground on mars? I feel like something could be there.
Beerinkol is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:54 PM   #5
Ifroham4

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,196
Senior Member
Default
We've only scratched the surface. Literally and Figuratively..
Ifroham4 is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:55 PM   #6
S.T.D.

Join Date
May 2008
Age
43
Posts
5,220
Senior Member
Default
I hope they find precious ore or some profitable anomaly. Nothing spurs progress like rich old men wanting to get richer.
S.T.D. is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:55 PM   #7
Slonopotam845

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,251
Senior Member
Default
Here's my question: Why water?

I read about this yesterday, and the first thing that popped into my head was, "how are they sure it's water (H2O) and not some other liquid?
Slonopotam845 is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:56 PM   #8
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
I assume the solubility of the various minerals in water is consistent with the conglomerates they found. There aren't many other substances that could be abundant on the surface of Mars and cause the observed effects.
softy54534 is offline


Old 06-02-2013, 11:56 PM   #9
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
Pretty much, ya. I don't think the team of scientists studying it would just to conclusions that drastically, especially since finding out what type of liquid it was/is is an extremely important discovery, even if it wasn't water.
Beerinkol is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:13 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity