Reply to Thread New Thread |
08-03-2010, 03:10 AM | #1 |
|
Justine stays out of appearnce fee, Maria to decide soon
2010/02/09 By Ajitpal Singh AUSTRALIAN Open finalist Justine Henin has decided not to participate in the US$250,000 (RM774,000) Sony Ericsson WTA Tour Malaysian International Open on Feb 22-28. Justine’s decision comes after the organisers, Carbon Media failed to raise the money for the appearance fee for the Belgian former World No 1. Justine, on her website, said she is back in Belgium for a break and will return to the tour in March at Indian Wells. Maria Kirilenko, the Russian who had earlier confirmed her participation, is now in two minds. According to a source, the World No 37 is asking for more money to play here and Carbon Media will need to raise the sum if they hope to get her. It is believed the organisers will need to raise between US$100,000 (RM340,000) and US$200,000 for each player. Carbon Media is not expected to approach any other big names for the tournament. “The tournament has no title sponsor so far. The ones we have approached declined, saying previous tennis tournaments in Kuala Lumpur did not attract enough publicity,” said a source yesterday. The Malaysian International Open will be held at the Bukit Kiara Equestrian and Country Resort. World No 7 Elena Dementieva of Russia leads the pack of world ranked players for the Malaysian Open. The others are China's Li Na (10) and Zheng Jie (20), Germany's Sabine Liscki (25), India's Sania Mirza (59), Japan's Kimiko Date Krumm (62) and Thailand's Tamarine Tanasugarn (87 http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/N...cle/index_html |
|
08-03-2010, 03:13 AM | #2 |
|
Now that appearance fees are okay with the WTA, I thought it was interesting to see it addressed in the open - I can't recall seeing other articles where it is discussed this clearly, and named as a reason why a tournament can attract desired players.
Kirilenko getting $100,000 + to enter a tournament. Surprised that she is in the 6 figure category. Guess the combination of the looks, and the increased visibilty following the Aussie up'd the change it takes to get her. Wonder how much Justine was looking for? |
|
08-03-2010, 03:37 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
08-03-2010, 03:51 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
08-03-2010, 03:59 AM | #9 |
|
I thought that sentence implied that Maria is $100,000 and Justine $200,000. I'd think Justine in your tournament is easily worth 6 figures. Additional press, additional ticket sales, and you probably get one or two sponsors events that she puts in an appearance at - and there are fans that would love to meet her, I am sure. But I really can't imagine what Kirilenko brings to the table that's worth 6 figures. |
|
08-03-2010, 04:02 AM | #10 |
|
Yeah, M8, I didn't read that sentence close enough. Plus, I bet a lot of money they rake in must come from private sponsors who'll also pay money for a meet'n'schmooze with the players. I'm guessing lots of rich middle-aged men will want to meet Maria (See: San Jose, Thursday's "Ladies' Luncheon with Fernando Verdasco") |
|
08-03-2010, 06:05 AM | #11 |
|
|
|
09-02-2010, 08:49 AM | #12 |
|
Yeah, M8, I didn't read that sentence close enough. |
|
09-02-2010, 10:59 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
09-02-2010, 12:58 PM | #15 |
|
Now that appearance fees are okay with the WTA, I thought it was interesting to see it addressed in the open - I can't recall seeing other articles where it is discussed this clearly, and named as a reason why a tournament can attract desired players. |
|
09-02-2010, 02:57 PM | #16 |
|
They already have three or four players ranked higher than Makiri, including one in the Top 10 (though the only one prettier than Maria is Elena )... that must have been already a lot of money spent on them... No wonder the sponsors may be reluctant to give more... I demand an apology. NOBODY is prettier than Makiri (although Elena is number 2, I agree ) Serious: Why is it that the women's tour can not accept that it is the market that decides these bonuses and prices? If Makiri can be put in the Tournament Official Poster, I guess that means some more money. Having spent considerable time in the Far East, it is clear that Makiri presents an opportunity for the sponsors, specially since Sharapova is not available. Tournaments like this one are show biz. Let the market decide. |
|
09-02-2010, 03:05 PM | #17 |
|
Serious: Why is it that the women's tour can not accept that it is the market that decides these bonuses and prices? If Makiri can be put in the Tournament Official Poster, I guess that means some more money. Having spent considerable time in the Far East, it is clear that Makiri presents an opportunity for the sponsors, specially since Sharapova is not available. |
|
09-02-2010, 05:32 PM | #18 |
|
Ok, now you did cross the line, man!!!! |
|
09-02-2010, 06:17 PM | #19 |
|
I think this is a slap in the face to the tennis players that have agreed to play in this tournament.
The WTA accepting and making it legal to give appearence fees and it becoming public just doesn't look good for the other tennis players. Do ALL of them get fees? If the 3rd ranked player is in a tournament and Makiri gets a $100,000 appearance fee...what does that say about the World's #3? |
|
09-02-2010, 06:36 PM | #20 |
|
If the 3rd ranked player is in a tournament and Makiri gets a $100,000 appearance fee...what does that say about the World's #3? P.S. Roger was rumored to get million dollars for playing in tiny tournaments of this sort (he rarely agrees to do it these days) |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|