Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I think the sqard for some teams are:
FRANCE:
CZECH REPUBLIC
ITALY
USA
What do you think? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Apart from the suspensions, which are simply not an issue, there's a couple of things I'd change in the French starting lineup to start with.
First, I doubt Bartoli is willing to be part of the FedCup team, especially if that includes Golovin. Instead of Loit I'd think they'd either use Mauresmo, Parmentier or Rezai, maybe even Pierce if she manages to make a strong comeback this year. I'd drop Bremond as a sub without batting an eyelid. Seriously, she's hardly had any significant match victories since her little Wimbledon run a couple of years ago. The rest of the possible subs you've named, well... ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
Apart from the suspensions, which are simply not an issue, there's a couple of things I'd change in the French starting lineup to start with.
Do you understand now? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Not only do I understand, PierceCheng, I think you're a model of patience and tolerance for not ordering the losing FedCup squads to be executed immediately following the ties. Seriously though, PierceCheng, I'm curious how you maintain your belief in this system of yours. I suppose I haven't followed the Fed Cup too closely, but it seems to me that they almost always field the highest ranked players available. Do you get upset when a player who lost a deciding tie is on the team next year? |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
I think the sqard for some teams are:
![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|