I think WTA should forbidden some players to play next tourn - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**Nekas48** · 06-07-2009, 05:00 PM

Because they lost a match is not acceptable (e.g. lost a match point, lost a second set when they were leading their opponents, a defender for the championship), they should take a rest to make self-examination to know why.

For example, Mary Pierce lost in first round of three tournaments consecutively since she lost to Li Na in third round of US Open at three ago after. When she won the first set 6-4, and then she lost twice set 0-6 suddenly. Since she won the first set, she should win the second set to face against the eventual champion Maria Sharapova. :angry:

What do you think?

**TheBest-Host** · 06-07-2009, 05:08 PM

Hi PierceCheng! Your way, almost no player would be able to play back-to-back events. They all lose at a given event, but one.

**bikersfan** · 06-07-2009, 05:28 PM

I think not only should they not be allowed to play the next tournament, they should have to pay each member of the audience $2.14 for making them witness such a horrible, shameful display.

What do you think of my means?

**aliceingoogs** · 06-07-2009, 05:32 PM

How 'bout we just do away with the WTA all together and save ourselves from any painful displays. grin

**Anamehuskeene** · 06-07-2009, 05:35 PM

Better yet... they can rush in and play one game in-between Men's sets as a sort of sideshow entertainment like cheerleading.

**TheBest-Host** · 06-07-2009, 05:54 PM

I think not only should they not be allowed to play the next tournament, they should have to pay each member of the audience $2.14 for making them witness such a horrible, shameful display.

What do you think of my means?

Only $2.14? How about a portion of their winnings at that event?

**sadgpokx** · 06-07-2009, 06:13 PM

Because they lost a match is not acceptable (e.g. lost a match point, lost a second set when they were leading their opponents, a defender for the championship), they should take a rest to make self-examination to know why.

For example, Mary Pierce lost in first round of three tournaments consecutively since she lost to Li Na in third round of US Open at three ago after. When she won the first set 6-4, and then she lost twice set 0-6 suddenly. Since she won the first set, she should win the second set to face against the eventual champion Maria Sharapova. :angry:

What do you think?

What do you have against Mary Pierce?

**TheBest-Host** · 06-07-2009, 06:18 PM

What do you have against Mary Pierce?

I know! Didn't Jelena Jankovic lose like 9 or 10 matches in a row a few years back? She should be the example. If anyone needed a time-out, it was her.

**hacyOrgachbic** · 06-07-2009, 06:21 PM

I know! Didn't Jelena Jankovic lose like 9 or 10 matches in a row a few years back? She should be the example. If anyone needed a time-out, it was her.

That isn't right. Everyone had bad moments in their career. There were times when....even Venus and Serena could have used time outs....oh wait..they actually had them! Serena dropped down to 81 in the world! Anyone remember what Vee dropped down to?

**Stovegeothnon** · 06-07-2009, 06:22 PM

...since she lost to Li Na in third round of US Open at three ago after. When she won the first set 6-4, and then she lost twice set 0-6 suddenly.

In all fairness that seems to be everyone's score against Na Li.

**sueplydup** · 06-07-2009, 06:34 PM

That isn't right. Everyone had bad moments in their career. There were times when....even Venus and Serena could have used time outs....oh wait..they actually had them! Serena dropped down to 81 in the world! Anyone remember what Vee dropped down to?

I think you completely missed the sarcasm.

**berdyanskdotsu** · 06-07-2009, 07:09 PM

I know! Didn't Jelena Jankovic lose like 9 or 10 matches in a row a few years back? She should be the example. If anyone needed a time-out, it was her.

It's called a calm period, shtexas.

But given JJ's most recent loss, I'm not sure 'calm' is the right adjective.

**freddystone** · 06-07-2009, 07:13 PM

It's called a calm period, shtexas.

But given JJ's most recent loss, I'm not sure 'calm' is the right adjective.

Wait. I thought there was NO adjective.

**aliceingoogs** · 06-07-2009, 07:15 PM

Wait. I thought there was NO adjective.

You just had to go there, didn't you. rofl

wink

**freddystone** · 06-07-2009, 07:18 PM

You just had to go there, didn't you. rofl

wink

It's nothing to be ashamed of. It's a perfectly normal biological process for all women.

And belslus.

**hacyOrgachbic** · 06-07-2009, 07:28 PM

I think you completely missed the sarcasm.

I was being sarcastic. So I guess it's you that missed the sarcasm

**Filmania** · 06-07-2009, 08:14 PM

Wait. I thought there was NO adjective.

**sueplydup** · 06-07-2009, 08:24 PM

I was being sarcastic. So I guess it's you that missed the sarcasm

Yeah...I don't think so.

**hacyOrgachbic** · 06-07-2009, 08:26 PM

Yeah...I don't think so.

Never knew a man to admit to being wrong. Of course you totally understood me and my post

that's why you said I missed the sarcasm.

**AdobeCreativeSuite** · 06-07-2009, 09:39 PM

How 'bout we just do away with the WTA all together and save ourselves from any painful displays. grin

Oh... that is very tempting... LOL!

06-07-2009, 05:00 PM	#1
Nekas48 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 477 Senior Member	I think WTA should forbidden some players to play next tourn Because they lost a match is not acceptable (e.g. lost a match point, lost a second set when they were leading their opponents, a defender for the championship), they should take a rest to make self-examination to know why. For example, Mary Pierce lost in first round of three tournaments consecutively since she lost to Li Na in third round of US Open at three ago after. When she won the first set 6-4, and then she lost twice set 0-6 suddenly. Since she won the first set, she should win the second set to face against the eventual champion Maria Sharapova. :angry: What do you think? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 05:08 PM	#2
TheBest-Host Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 463 Senior Member	Hi PierceCheng! Your way, almost no player would be able to play back-to-back events. They all lose at a given event, but one. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 05:28 PM	#3
bikersfan Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 390 Senior Member	I think not only should they not be allowed to play the next tournament, they should have to pay each member of the audience $2.14 for making them witness such a horrible, shameful display. What do you think of my means? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 05:32 PM	#4
aliceingoogs Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 607 Senior Member	How 'bout we just do away with the WTA all together and save ourselves from any painful displays. grin Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 05:35 PM	#5
Anamehuskeene Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 432 Senior Member	Better yet... they can rush in and play one game in-between Men's sets as a sort of sideshow entertainment like cheerleading. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 05:54 PM	#6
TheBest-Host Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 463 Senior Member	I think not only should they not be allowed to play the next tournament, they should have to pay each member of the audience $2.14 for making them witness such a horrible, shameful display. What do you think of my means? Only $2.14? How about a portion of their winnings at that event? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 06:13 PM	#7
sadgpokx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 552 Senior Member	Because they lost a match is not acceptable (e.g. lost a match point, lost a second set when they were leading their opponents, a defender for the championship), they should take a rest to make self-examination to know why. For example, Mary Pierce lost in first round of three tournaments consecutively since she lost to Li Na in third round of US Open at three ago after. When she won the first set 6-4, and then she lost twice set 0-6 suddenly. Since she won the first set, she should win the second set to face against the eventual champion Maria Sharapova. :angry: What do you think? What do you have against Mary Pierce? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 06:18 PM	#8
TheBest-Host Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 463 Senior Member	What do you have against Mary Pierce? I know! Didn't Jelena Jankovic lose like 9 or 10 matches in a row a few years back? She should be the example. If anyone needed a time-out, it was her. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 06:21 PM	#9
hacyOrgachbic Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 588 Senior Member	I know! Didn't Jelena Jankovic lose like 9 or 10 matches in a row a few years back? She should be the example. If anyone needed a time-out, it was her. That isn't right. Everyone had bad moments in their career. There were times when....even Venus and Serena could have used time outs....oh wait..they actually had them! Serena dropped down to 81 in the world! Anyone remember what Vee dropped down to? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 06:22 PM	#10
Stovegeothnon Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 508 Senior Member	...since she lost to Li Na in third round of US Open at three ago after. When she won the first set 6-4, and then she lost twice set 0-6 suddenly. In all fairness that seems to be everyone's score against Na Li. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 06:34 PM	#11
sueplydup Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	That isn't right. Everyone had bad moments in their career. There were times when....even Venus and Serena could have used time outs....oh wait..they actually had them! Serena dropped down to 81 in the world! Anyone remember what Vee dropped down to? I think you completely missed the sarcasm. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 07:09 PM	#12
berdyanskdotsu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 428 Senior Member	I know! Didn't Jelena Jankovic lose like 9 or 10 matches in a row a few years back? She should be the example. If anyone needed a time-out, it was her. It's called a calm period, shtexas. But given JJ's most recent loss, I'm not sure 'calm' is the right adjective. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 07:13 PM	#13
freddystone Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 652 Senior Member	It's called a calm period, shtexas. But given JJ's most recent loss, I'm not sure 'calm' is the right adjective. Wait. I thought there was NO adjective. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 07:15 PM	#14
aliceingoogs Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 607 Senior Member	Wait. I thought there was NO adjective. You just had to go there, didn't you. rofl wink Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 07:18 PM	#15
freddystone Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 652 Senior Member	You just had to go there, didn't you. rofl wink It's nothing to be ashamed of. It's a perfectly normal biological process for all women. And belslus. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

06-07-2009, 07:28 PM	#16
hacyOrgachbic Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 588 Senior Member	I think you completely missed the sarcasm. I was being sarcastic. So I guess it's you that missed the sarcasm Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 08:14 PM	#17
Filmania Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 478 Senior Member	Wait. I thought there was NO adjective. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 08:24 PM	#18
sueplydup Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 538 Senior Member	I was being sarcastic. So I guess it's you that missed the sarcasm Yeah...I don't think so. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 08:26 PM	#19
hacyOrgachbic Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 588 Senior Member	Yeah...I don't think so. Never knew a man to admit to being wrong. Of course you totally understood me and my post that's why you said I missed the sarcasm. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

06-07-2009, 09:39 PM	#20
AdobeCreativeSuite Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 520 Senior Member	How 'bout we just do away with the WTA all together and save ourselves from any painful displays. grin Oh... that is very tempting... LOL! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote