[slarceSelia]

I counted all title winners (min 2) on both tours. Here are the lists with current top 10 players in red:


ATP

1. Federer 59
2. Nadal 36
3. Hewitt, Roddick 27
5. Moya 20
6. Safin 15
7. Davydenko 14
8. Djokovic 13
9. Ferrero, Murray, Haas 12
12. Gonzalez 11
13. Nalbandian, Blake 10
15. Robredo 9
16. Ljubicic 8
17. Ferrer, Canas 7
19. Tursunov, Santoro, Kiefer, Hrbaty, Massu 6
24. Simon, Berdych, Almagro, Lapentti, del Potro 5
29. Tsonga, Stepanek, Schuettler, Dent, Clement, Youzhny, Matieu, Chela, Karlovic 4
38. Soderling, Fish, Ancic, Andreev, Acasuso, Malisse, Vicente, Koubek, Llodra, Cilic 3
48. Verdasco, Kohlschreiber, Montanes, Darcis, Volandri, Baghdatis, Granollers, Ginepri, Serra, Rochus, Mahut, Calleri 2


WTA

1. V. Williams 41
2. S. Williams 33
3. Mauresmo 25
4. Sharapova 19
5. Dementieva 13
6. Safina, Kuznetsova, Schnyder 11
9. Jankovic 10
10. Zvonareva, Petrova, Medina Garrigues 9
13. Ivanovic 8
14. Chakvetadze, Date 7
16. Pennetta, Sugyiama, Vaidisova 6
19. Wozniacki, Kirilenko, Dokic 5
22. Radwanska, Bartoli, Srebotnik, Safarova 4
26. Azarenka, Zheng, Hantuchova, Tanasugarn, Krajicek, Bovina, Ruano Pascual, Peer, Dulko 3
35. Li, Razzano, Errani, Vinci, Parmentier, Zakopalova, Llagostera Vives,Szavay 2

[EarnestKS]

Wow really cool, thanks. I wish I had more time to look at it right now!

Schnyder's 11 titles surprises me; don't know that off the top of my head I could name more than two or so...

Also, Verdasco should be "redded" on the ATP list. I only saw nine red names and I wondered which of the top 10 got there with less than two titles

[PyncGyncliacy]

Really surprised Mauresmo's so high, but thinking about it, I can account for a lot of them

Thanks, suliso!

[abossakon]

Verdasco has won half as many titles as Ivo Karlovic?

[Khurlxgq]

Blake and Nalbandian should be tied.

And Chaks being only one behind Ivanovic says a lot.

[repldoinfo]

So, Gasquet is like not even on the list of title winners anymore?

[Penisvergroesserung]

Funny that 2 of Kuznetsova's 11 titles are Grand Slams.

[secondmertg]

Funny that 2 of Kuznetsova's 11 titles are Grand Slams.

Mhmm. And I didn't sit and do the math, but I'm assuming Serena's 10 out of 33 being Grand Slams has got to be the highest percentage, right? Maybe even of all time (so far)?

[abossakon]

Mhmm. And I didn't sit and do the math, but I'm assuming Serena's 10 out of 33 being Grand Slams has got to be the highest percentage, right? Maybe even of all time (so far)?

Right now it probably is. At one point, though, I'm pretty sure Mats Wilander's percentage was at exactly 100%

[Khurlxgq]

Right now it probably is. At one point, though, I'm pretty sure Mats Wilander's percentage was at exactly 100%

And Kuerten.

[masteryxisman]

So, Gasquet is like not even on the list of title winners anymore?

Can I second that ! The man hasn't been judged yet and out he goes.

[gyjsdtuwr]

Venus has more titles than Serena?

[spacecrafty]

Mhmm. And I didn't sit and do the math, but I'm assuming Serena's 10 out of 33 being Grand Slams has got to be the highest percentage, right? Maybe even of all time (so far)?

Serena is a slam specialist. It's bizarre. (Sign of a winning mentality, though.)

[sadgpokx]

So, Gasquet is like not even on the list of title winners anymore?

He is not an active player as of now.

[Blacksheepaalredy]

I counted all title winners (min 2) on both tours. Here are the lists with current top 10 players in red:


ATP

1. Federer 59
2. Nadal 36
3. Hewitt, Roddick 27
5. Moya 20
6. Safin 15
7. Davydenko 14
8. Djokovic 13
9. Ferrero, Murray, Haas 12
12. Gonzalez 11
13. Nalbandian, Blake 10
15. Robredo 9
16. Ljubicic 8
17. Ferrer, Canas 7
19. Tursunov, Santoro, Kiefer, Hrbaty, Massu 6
24. Simon, Berdych, Almagro, Lapentti, del Potro 5
29. Tsonga, Stepanek, Schuettler, Dent, Clement, Youzhny, Matieu, Chela, Karlovic 4
38. Soderling, Fish, Ancic, Andreev, Acasuso, Malisse, Vicente, Koubek, Llodra, Cilic 3
48. Verdasco, Kohlschreiber, Montanes, Darcis, Volandri, Baghdatis, Granollers, Ginepri, Serra, Rochus, Mahut, Calleri 2


WTA

1. V. Williams 41
2. S. Williams 33
3. Mauresmo 25
4. Sharapova 19
5. Dementieva 13
6. Safina, Kuznetsova, Schnyder 11
9. Jankovic 10
10. Zvonareva, Petrova, Medina Garrigues 9
13. Ivanovic 8
14. Chakvetadze, Date 7
16. Pennetta, Sugyiama, Vaidisova 6
19. Wozniacki, Kirilenko, Dokic 5
22. Radwanska, Bartoli, Srebotnik, Safarova 4
26. Azarenka, Zheng, Hantuchova, Tanasugarn, Krajicek, Bovina, Ruano Pascual, Peer, Dulko 3
35. Li, Razzano, Errani, Vinci, Parmentier, Zakopalova, Llagostera Vives,Szavay 2

thanks Suliso, great compilation!

I know that a title is a title but do ,let say, 3 Tier *12* tourneys count as much as tournaments like Indian Wells or Miami or slams. Seeing Kirilenko being higher than Azarenka is a bit weird in my opinion.

Youzhny and Kohlschreiber with so little compared to their talent is disappointing too!

I wonder whether there was a case of a player going far in slams or in tourneys but actually failing to clinch a title or having little to show despite good runs and being very good a player...Youzhny and Nieminen fit that case for instance.

[Blacksheepaalredy]

haaaaa, come on Gasquet should be there, it\s not like he is never coming back and has to be erased from the game,

[slarceSelia]

Venus has more titles than Serena?

You really didn't know it?

thanks Suliso, great compilation!

I know that a title is a title but do ,let say, 3 Tier *12* tourneys count as much as tournaments like Indian Wells or Miami or slams. Seeing Kirilenko being higher than Azarenka is a bit weird in my opinion.

Yes of course, but it would become subjective straight away and you would have to account for age as well. Some on the list are ready to retire and some are still teenagers.

I wonder whether there was a case of a player going far in slams or in tourneys but actually failing to clinch a title or having little to show despite good runs and being very good a player...Youzhny and Nieminen fit that case for instance.

Cibulkova still doesn't have a title. Tipsarevic too, Schiavone has only one.

[slarceSelia]

Gasquet is not erased from the game any more than other currently inactive players.

And by the way Clijsters (37 titles) will be added soon, but not until she actually plays her first tournament.

[Khurlxgq]

Gasquet is not erased from the game any more than other currently inactive players.

And by the way Clijsters (37 titles) will be added soon, but not until she actually plays her first tournament.

The opposite of a slam specialist...

[Blacksheepaalredy]

Yes of course, but it would become subjective straight away and you would have to account for age as well. Some on the list are ready to retire and some are still teenagers.


Cibulkova still doesn't have a title. Tipsarevic too, Schiavone has only one.

yes you\re right about the subjectivity, I just meant qualitatively it just bothers me a bit[/COLOR].

wooh. thanks, Domi is quite young though, she can make it up. I\m not sure Schiavone or Tipsa, who is the same age as Gilles Simon, have some time left....