Reply to Thread New Thread |
05-28-2009, 12:53 AM | #1 |
|
PARIS (AP) -There are plenty of theories about why U.S. men have so much trouble at the French Open, and James Blake offered his thoughts on the matter after losing in the first round Tuesday.
"For the Americans, a lot of times, this isn't our main goal of the year. Ours is generally Wimbledon and the U.S. Open,'' Blake said. "I think if we were to try to prepare completely for the French Open, we would be giving away some of our advantage at the Wimbledon and the U.S. Open. That's where we excel. We'd rather, I think, prepare best for what our strengths are.'' http://tinyurl.com/o496x9 |
|
05-28-2009, 12:57 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 12:59 AM | #3 |
|
PARIS (AP) -There are plenty of theories about why U.S. men have so much trouble at the French Open, and James Blake offered his thoughts on the matter after losing in the first round Tuesday. F- That's a valid excuse for Ivan Lendl, not James Blake |
|
05-28-2009, 01:37 AM | #6 |
|
The answer seems to imply that James is answering for the American players (or rather the American men players), and I think overall for the Americans it is somewhat true. For the American players the clay court season doesn't seem to be something they really prep for or build their year around. They like Houston, then they come to Europe for a few weeks and schedule early flights home from Roland Garros. Lack of clay court mindset and play when coming up is a big part of that, but in some ways they are both the cause and the effect. If Americans thought the clay season was important they would probably teach children how to move on it and play on it more, etc. Apparently they need to pass around that Mary Carillo "I want my kids to grow up to be clay courters" video a bit more...
Right now the American men aren't doing all that great in general, but there best chances (slim as they might be) of winning a major are certainly at the US Open, then Wimbledon, then the Australian Open. It would be poor planning for the current batch of players to attempt some sort of comeback at the French... |
|
05-28-2009, 02:06 AM | #7 |
|
Right now the American men aren't doing all that great in general, but there best chances (slim as they might be) of winning a major are certainly at the US Open, then Wimbledon, then the Australian Open. It would be poor planning for the current batch of players to attempt some sort of comeback at the French... "Practice doesn't make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect." I feel like not giving an honest effort is a bad habit to flirt with, no matter the surface. I firmly believe that if Blake were to try harder on clay, it would help him on other surfaces. Besides the extra match fitness, he's going to be running into "clay courters" on all surfaces, and building some H2Hs with them could also be beneficial. So I suppose my point is that Americans putting in the effort and performing better at the French would help them perform better at all slams. |
|
05-28-2009, 03:15 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 03:17 AM | #9 |
|
"For the Americans, a lot of times, this isn't our main goal of the year. Ours is generally Wimbledon and the U.S. Open,'' Blake said. And this generation of Americans, James, for whom it is not a main goal - all of you combined have, uh, one Slam? |
|
05-28-2009, 03:26 AM | #10 |
|
Aren't we only a generation (if that) removed from a contingent of US men that consisted of French Open winner Michael Chang, French Open winner (and 8X Slam champion) Andre Agassi, 2X French Open winner (and 4X Slam champion) Jim Courier, and probably would have given anything to have won the French Open once (and 14X Slam champion) Pete Sampras? Agassi used to limit his clay play too. Early on, he hit on hard courts in the old Asian swing and came to the clay late. Didn't seem to be a problem for him. |
|
05-28-2009, 03:37 AM | #11 |
|
I don't know if I understand why everyone's saying James Blake "isn't trying" in his matches. That seems to me to be a misrepresentation of his statement. And wasn't he just in a clay court final? He said Americans don't prepare for the French Open as much because they're focusing on preparing for other tournaments. Is this not a description of the second half of Pete Sampras' career? He really telegraphed in some poor results there after 1996.
And I'm not terribly pleased with the selective reporting either. I just watched some of and read the transcript of the interview and the message I'm getting is not "I didn't try." He was asked a question about why US men don't handle best-of-five-set matches on clay well. James countered that by mentioning some good Davis Cup results (by Andy Roddick) but James, being James, tries to be diplomatic and suggests reasons why U.S. men haven't done well. He's not making excuses, he's stating a fact. But seriously, people here have a problem with the notion that Andy Roddick would take his Wimbledon preparation more seriously than his French Open prep? |
|
05-28-2009, 03:46 AM | #12 |
|
I feel like only playing a few clay tournaments isn't a huge deal, but not even trying at the ones he does play is inexcusable to me. To some extent such statements make it easy to not put forth effort since so little is expected of them. I just hope it isn't the kind of thing they pass along. I can see it being like the girls and math thing, that by telling younger tennis players that Americans are bad on clay makes it true for more of them. "Practice doesn't make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect." Haha, I've never actually heard this before today, but I was reading over some power point slides that said it earlier... I feel like not giving an honest effort is a bad habit to flirt with, no matter the surface. I firmly believe that if Blake were to try harder on clay, it would help him on other surfaces. Besides the extra match fitness, he's going to be running into "clay courters" on all surfaces, and building some H2Hs with them could also be beneficial. So I suppose my point is that Americans putting in the effort and performing better at the French would help them perform better at all slams. I don't disagree, and I would think that even if they wouldn't do it for the French they would try to improve for Davis Cup. I think that doing better on clay couldn't hurt any of them, but at this point in the careers on the current batch of American men, I can see why they aren't focusing on it. I just don't think they can hope to be all around great players and be real challengers for majors on every surface. |
|
05-28-2009, 04:06 AM | #13 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 04:09 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 04:10 AM | #15 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 04:45 AM | #16 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 05:00 AM | #17 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 05:05 AM | #18 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 05:07 AM | #19 |
|
|
|
05-28-2009, 05:27 AM | #20 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|