| Reply to Thread New Thread |
05-16-2009, 09:20 AM
|
#1 |
|
|
 I think some players should not play next ATP/WTA tournament
Because they can't get or defend their trophy, they should withdraw next tournaments to make a self-examination to prevent do it again.
For example, Mary Pierce since lost to Li Na in three years ago of US Open (she won the first set 6-4, she should won next set to face against the eventual champion Maria Sharapova in next round, but she lost the two set 0-6 fairly), she should take a rest at least three months.  But she as usualy played next three tournament (include Luxembourg, Stuggart and Zurich), as a result she lost to her opponents (A. Bondarenko, Jankovic, Srebonik) in first round consecutively!!  What do you think? 
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 10:30 AM
|
#2 |
|
|
Ain't nothing like a calm period
 .PierceCheng, are you free to come to the US Open Tailgate this year? We'd all love to meet you! |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 08:58 PM
|
#3 |
|
|
Ain't nothing like a calm period  (I really would love to meet you PeirceChang! |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 09:52 PM
|
#4 |
|
|
Ain't nothing like a calm period |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 11:10 PM
|
#5 |
|
|
|
|
|
PierceCheng! 
|
05-16-2009, 11:15 PM
|
#6 |
|
|
Can we implement this with the French Open? Anyone who loses has to take the next 3 months off. After those 127 players enter their calm period, Angela Haynes can finally win Wimbledon.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 12:00 AM
|
#7 |
|
|
Because they can't get or defend their trophy, they should withdraw next tournaments to make a self-examination to prevent do it again. |
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 12:10 AM
|
#8 |
|
|
I think you need to go back one match, Pierce Chang, to Mary's match against Eva Birnerova in the 2nd round at the USO.
While Mary won that match, I remember thinking while watching that match that if Mary plays like this in her next match (against Li Na), she might take a set, but then would likely end up getting double bagelled. |
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 12:19 AM
|
#9 |
|
|
Under this rule, Serena could not take part in Roland Garros. We can't have that, now can we? Don't answer that mmmm8.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 12:43 AM
|
#10 |
|
|
Under this rule, Serena could not take part in Roland Garros. We can't have that, now can we? Don't answer that mmmm8. 
|
|
|
|
05-17-2009, 05:21 AM
|
#11 |
|
|
After my performance in TSIP, I could probably use three months of self-examination.
|
|
|
|
05-19-2009, 08:48 AM
|
#12 |
|
|
Is this another one of the Firsts type deals? PC cannot be real. Someone fess up already.
|
|
|
|
05-19-2009, 04:19 PM
|
#13 |
|
|
After my performance in TSIP, I could probably use three months of self-examination. After all.....it ain't like certain TAT members (pun intended) need any encouragement for more, ahem, self-examination...... 
|
|
|
|
05-19-2009, 04:22 PM
|
#14 |
|
|
Is this another one of the Firsts type deals? PC cannot be real. Someone fess up already. SILLY bea. They're real. And they're spectacular.
|
|
|
|
05-19-2009, 06:08 PM
|
#15 |
|
|
We need a pic of PC. At least to prove his existence to bea.
|
|
|
|
05-20-2009, 06:56 AM
|
#16 |
|
|
Bea--- First order of business: Feed me!
I also thought I would mention that PC used to post on the TW message board and I'd bet my gills that he is fo' realz.. He should blog...no? Feed me. |
|
|
|
05-25-2009, 08:42 AM
|
#17 |
|
|
Bea--- First order of business: Feed me! |
|
|
| Reply to Thread New Thread |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Linear Mode
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
