Reply to Thread New Thread |
05-16-2009, 01:47 PM | #1 |
|
MADRID (AP) -Dinara Safina may just be the most underappreciated No. 1 in women's tennis.
Why is that? "I guess they're jealous that I'm so young and No. 1.," Safina said at the Madrid Open on Friday. "I don't know. I really don't know." (...) "To become No. 1 it's not just winning the Grand Slams, it's how you compete the whole year," the 23-year-old Russian said. "I won last year four tournaments ... I beat almost all the top-10 players so I think I deserve that spot." Jelena Jankovic, another who rose to No. 1 without a Grand Slam win, endorsed that overall thinking. "She's in this moment No. 1 and that's all that matters," Jankovic said. "What everybody else is saying it doesn't matter, everyone has their opinions and everyone can talk all they want but not everyone can say they're No. 1. "I finished last year No. 1 and I didn't steal that, it didn't fall from the sky - I earned it." (...) Only a handful of journalists bothered to attend Safina's press conference after a quarterfinals victory over Alona Bondarenko in front of half-empty bleachers in the "Magic Box" tennis center's main stadium. http://www.cbssports.com/tennis/story/11750395 |
|
05-16-2009, 02:37 PM | #2 |
|
Dina is wrong about one thing (more than one thing, depending on who you talk to)... Mauresmo was roasted for being #1 and not having a major in very much the same way. So that's not true.
Eleven finals in her last 19 events... That's really impressive. And Jelena DOES have something to prove... Not to tennis fans, but to herself. |
|
05-16-2009, 03:21 PM | #3 |
|
Dina is wrong about one thing (more than one thing, depending on who you talk to)... Mauresmo was roasted for being #1 and not having a major in very much the same way. So that's not true. |
|
05-16-2009, 03:24 PM | #4 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 03:28 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 03:35 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 04:20 PM | #7 |
|
I have a problem with the overuse of the word "haters" (I don't think it's in the article). A hater is someone who criticizes a player without a legitimate basis.
Criticizing Safina for being #1 without having won a major is legitimate criticism (especially when, in the same time frame, Serena has won 2 majors and been the runner up in another). Safina is responding to her "critics", not "haters". |
|
05-16-2009, 04:29 PM | #8 |
|
I have a problem with the overuse of the word "haters" (I don't think it's in the article). A hater is someone who criticizes a player without a legitimate basis. |
|
05-16-2009, 04:52 PM | #9 |
|
Talking about how young she is gets me too. She's middle aged by tennis standards. Easiest way to silence the critics, Dinara - Win the French. Till then, they have every right to say something. |
|
05-16-2009, 05:04 PM | #10 |
|
And Kim was more than 2 1/2 years younger when she was Slamless #1, than Dinara was when she reached the 1 spot. |
|
05-16-2009, 05:07 PM | #11 |
|
I can almost feel the weight of expectation getting heavier heavier as the FO approaches. If Serena takes the French, I think Safina is gonna look awfully silly. |
|
05-16-2009, 05:10 PM | #12 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 05:11 PM | #13 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 05:16 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 05:21 PM | #15 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 05:29 PM | #17 |
|
Well she's ranked #1 and was a finalist last year, so I think there is an expectation. Don't question me. ; ) |
|
05-16-2009, 05:32 PM | #18 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 07:36 PM | #19 |
|
|
|
05-16-2009, 07:38 PM | #20 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|