Reply to Thread New Thread |
03-21-2009, 03:13 AM | #1 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 03:19 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 03:38 AM | #3 |
|
Are we talking about winning their semi or beating Nadal? Federer beating Murray would be an upset, much like Roddick beating Nadal. |
|
03-21-2009, 03:40 AM | #4 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 03:41 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 03:43 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 03:57 AM | #7 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 04:32 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 05:04 AM | #9 |
|
I think Roddick is an underdog and a win by him would be a good upset.
Murray is a great player and if I had to bet my life, I suppose I'd pick him over Fed but a Fed win would not go in the Wow I can't believe it file. Someone mentioned Fed needed it more. I don't really agree. Fed needs Grand Slams.. period. There's nothing else to prove or enhance his legacy other than perhaps Roland Garros. He was much maligned through 2008 but sure felt pretty good about the U.S. Open victory. |
|
03-21-2009, 05:27 AM | #10 |
|
Someone mentioned Fed needed it more. I don't really agree. Fed needs Grand Slams.. period. There's nothing else to prove or enhance his legacy other than perhaps Roland Garros. He was much maligned through 2008 but sure felt pretty good about the U.S. Open victory. |
|
03-21-2009, 07:25 AM | #13 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 04:07 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 04:21 PM | #15 |
|
|
|
03-21-2009, 05:32 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|