LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-07-2008, 06:20 PM   #1
beth

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
334
Senior Member
Default Misplaced comma, or is Lindsay re-retiring?
I love, and have a huge amount of respect for Jon. But there are moments when his grammar leaves you wishing SI would hire a personal proofreader for him.

This sentence means (at least) two different things, depending on the placement of the comma.

• Having withdrawn before her second rounder with a dodgy knee, Lindsay Davenport might retire, having won her final match at Wimbledon. How many other players can say that?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....things/1.html


So does he mean she won't be back to Wimbledon, but can say she won her last match there?

Or does he mean she is re-retiring, and she can say she won her final match, which occurred at Wimbledon?
beth is offline


Old 07-07-2008, 06:23 PM   #2
Falik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
518
Senior Member
Default
I love, and have a huge amount of respect for Jon. But there are moments when his grammar leaves you wishing SI would hire a personal proofreader for him.

This sentence means (at least) two different things, depending on the placement of the comma.

• Having withdrawn before her second rounder with a dodgy knee, Lindsay Davenport might retire, having won her final match at Wimbledon. How many other players can say that?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....things/1.html


So does he mean she won't be back to Wimbledon, but can say she won her last match there?

Or does he mean she is re-retiring, and she can say she won her final match, which occurred at Wimbledon?
I would read that to mean that she might be finished for good, as in the latter of your two scenarios.
Falik is offline


Old 07-07-2008, 06:25 PM   #3
VeniHemealm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Same here, she's done - that she played and won her last match at Wimbledon. Then he goes and throws in "might."
VeniHemealm is offline


Old 07-07-2008, 06:28 PM   #4
autolubitelone

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
While I won't comment on the comma, I can say that Lindsay was pretty candid in her BBC interviews. She basically all but said that she'd be done at the end of the year.

Expect a California hard court event, the Olympics, and the Open.

Maybe Bali if she's got frequent flyer miles lying around.
autolubitelone is offline


Old 07-07-2008, 06:32 PM   #5
Klissineopar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default
I'm watching to see if she makes her scheduled play with WTT - Thursday and Saturday this week.
Klissineopar is offline


Old 07-07-2008, 06:35 PM   #6
bomondus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
I love, and have a huge amount of respect for Jon. But there are moments when his grammar leaves you wishing SI would hire a personal proofreader for him.

This sentence means (at least) two different things, depending on the placement of the comma.

• Having withdrawn before her second rounder with a dodgy knee, Lindsay Davenport might retire, having won her final match at Wimbledon. How many other players can say that?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....things/1.html


So does he mean she won't be back to Wimbledon, but can say she won her last match there?

Or does he mean she is re-retiring, and she can say she won her final match, which occurred at Wimbledon?
I read it as version two, but with emphasis on might.

I think the comma's actually in the right place in either case, but the order of phrases is confusing.
bomondus is offline


Old 07-07-2008, 06:39 PM   #7
BuyCheapest

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
625
Senior Member
Default
I'm assuming he meant that's her final match at Wimbledon.

She still sounds hellbent on playing the Olympics.
BuyCheapest is offline


Old 07-07-2008, 07:06 PM   #8
indianstory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
532
Senior Member
Default
I'm watching to see if she makes her scheduled play with WTT - Thursday and Saturday this week.
She's all for honoring commitments but this one seems like a no go. Why risk it with her sole reason for coming back, the Olympics, mere weeks away?

I don't think anyone expects her to come back after this year. Thank goodness I buried and mourned her a year and a half ago.
indianstory is offline


Old 11-07-2008, 01:30 PM   #9
TimEricsson

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
341
Senior Member
Default
I love, and have a huge amount of respect for Jon. But there are moments when his grammar leaves you wishing SI would hire a personal proofreader for him.

This sentence means (at least) two different things, depending on the placement of the comma.

• Having withdrawn before her second rounder with a dodgy knee, Lindsay Davenport might retire, having won her final match at Wimbledon. How many other players can say that?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....things/1.html


So does he mean she won't be back to Wimbledon, but can say she won her last match there?

Or does he mean she is re-retiring, and she can say she won her final match, which occurred at Wimbledon?
Let me put it this way. If we're still talking about Lindsay as active player this time next year i would be very surprised. From most of the stuff Lindsay has been say in press conferences lately I think she will play her last career matches at the US Open with a retirement announcement. coming not long after. I will really miss her too.
TimEricsson is offline


Old 11-07-2008, 02:43 PM   #10
viagra-kaufen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
Re-retiring before Wimbledon rolls around again - agree that it will most likely be after the US Open, so she will have won her final Wimbledon match (but not necessarily would that be her final match.)
viagra-kaufen is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity