LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-27-2010, 03:44 AM   #1
tgs

Join Date
Mar 2007
Age
48
Posts
5,125
Senior Member
Default The Wrong Way to Fight Jihad
The Wrong Way to Fight Jihad


Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Vijay Kumar, who is currently running for the U.S. Congress as a Republican candidate for Tennessee 5th Congressional District. The Primary vote comes on August 5 of this year, and the General Election is on November 4. When he ran before, in 2008, he received about 30% of the vote in Republican Primary. His website is kumarforcongress.com. Visit his blog at kumarforcongress.net.

From news article:
.....

FP: Let me ask you this: World War I was won in four years, World War II was won in six years. But the Israel/Palestine and the India/Pakistan conflicts have not resolved after 62 years. Why do you think?

Kumar: It’s simple: Muslims do not want peace, they want conquest. When they enter into an alleged “peace accord,” it is only a ploy to buy time to build their position for ultimate conquest. This is by their own creed: in Islam’s system of “ethics,” it is perfectly acceptable to lie to mere infidels.

In the case of Israel, the West has never been 100% behind Israeli sovereignty. Both the West and Israel have always only wanted to buy truce with the Islamic nations–never peace. It is an endless case of appeasement that puts Neville Chamberlain to shame.

As I have said before, and as history proves conclusively and invariably, Islam does not recognize pluralism, and Islam never wants a lasting peace with any non-Islamic people or states. When Muslims are in a relatively weak position they may offer truce–a temporary agreement–but never lasting peace. Even a cursory study of the treaties made by Muhammad proves at once that every Islamic treaty is merely another tactic toward ultimate conquest and domination. He set the standard for using treaties as a path to conquest.

Since then, Islam has been waging a relentless war for the past 1,400 years against every non-Muslim within their reach. In the last century, technological advances have extended the reach of the Muslim world considerably. Anybody who believes that it’s suddenly going to change–for any reason, through any amount of “diplomacy”–is either grossly uninformed or delusional.

Islamic imperialists have no desire at all for peaceful coexistence with Israel. They want to annihilate the “Zionist Entity.” By the way, during the last 60 years, Israel has absorbed more than a million Sephardic Jews from Arab countries. The Arab nations, on the other hand, refuse to absorb two million Palestinians. It’s a sad irony that two million Palestinians are considered so important while at the same time the suffering inflicted upon 50 million Kurdish people by Muslim nations goes almost unnoticed, unremarked.

Muslims do not recognize the right to existence of either Israel or India. They simply consider them roadblocks to world conquest that need to be removed, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes. Universal Jihad is infinite, endless war against the infidel. It has been formally, blatantly declared. To the Muslim, Jewish Israel and Hindu India are nothing more than inferior infidel nation-states that must be torn down and brought under Islamic control.

Remember this: Kashmir was a Hindu land continuously for 5,000 years. That’s over twice as long as the time that has passed since the birth of Christ. Islam went there as an imperial force, subjugated the local people, and conquered them, both politically and demographically, after 5,000 years of Hindu peace and civilization. Hence, today the Kashmiri Hindus are refugees in their own land. They have been reduced to a minority.

It is not Kashmir alone. Now Muslims of India wants Mughalstan, the Land of Mugal empire. They want to build an Islamic state from Pakistan to Bangladesh that includes the entirety of north India.

Every year, we are paying Islamic tribute to Pakistan, Egypt, and Palestinians in hopes of maintaining a tenuous truce. We are not really giving them “aid.” It is nothing but Islamic tribute to keep them at bay.

It’s really too simple for anyone to try to complicate it: Islam wants the entire world to submit. India and Israel are simply two obstacles or roadblocks to that goal. If they can get Israel and India to disappear from the face of earth, Islamic Umma–community, or “nation” in the larger sense–would be one unified imperialism from Morocco to Indonesia. Then it would be Europe’s turn to be annihilated.
tgs is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 07:07 AM   #2
MannoFr

Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
4,451
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by Sanket
Muslims do not recognize the right to existence of either Israel or India. They simply consider them roadblocks to world conquest that need to be removed, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes.

Which Muslims? All of us??? It seems to me with a load of exaggerations like that, Kumar and others are implying that Muslims are the ones who have no right to exist. And that flies in the face of the majority of Muslims who coexist just fine in India and elsewhere.
1. Can you name one country, just one, with a Muslim majority that accepts Israel's existence? And acts like it...,so don't bring up the "paper peace" with Egypt and Jordan, hardly states that show any desire or tendency to exist with us in any way.

2. Strong statement that "majority of Muslims coexist just fine in India and elsewhere". Where is that? And coexist with whom? So far the only country I can think of where indeed the majority of Muslims coexist just fine is Israel.....of all places. What an irony, huh?

3. I don't read anywhere that Kumar states Muslims have no right to exist, unless I get different messages than you.

4. In addition to not allowing India or Israel to exist, Muslims are having quite some activity going in a handful of African states, Nigeria being the one where those Christians trying to coexist with the ever-expanding Muslims had to pay a heavy price.

Religion of Peace? Sure, but only if Muslims are so "brave" to denounce the violence perpetrated by their Brethren, and, please, don't retort with your usual comparison to the Crusaders.... We are talking today, today's agenda of the fanatics amongst you, against whom you don't lift a finger, let alone denounce their rape of your supposed peaceful religion.
MannoFr is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 02:36 PM   #3
Big A

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
50
Posts
4,148
Administrator
Default
...1. Can you name one country, just one, with a Muslim majority that accepts Israel's existence? And acts like it...,so don't bring up the "paper peace" with Egypt and Jordan, hardly states that show any desire or tendency to exist with us in any way...
Actually until the AKP took power, we used to have a pretty good relationship with Turkey. There are still many Turks that are not happy with the way their country is going, so that situation may change some day.
Big A is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity