LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-14-2008, 01:55 AM   #1
brraverishhh

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,127
Senior Member
Default islam, moslems and slitting hindu throats
1.Obviously I do not care for andak, but these posts top everything else I have seen.
2. He clearly supports that man getting his throat slashed.
3.The he tries his usual backtrack.
4.He then says he does not blame Christianity for the Crusades. Because he does not want people to blame Islam for all the problems the Muslims are causing across the world. He once again thinks he is smarter then everyone, as Muslims are using their scriptures to justify their actions. The Crusades were not done because of the Bible. They were done to take back what was theirs, they were done to stop Islam from taking over.
5.Andak lied on the forum that I threatened him in a pm. I asked the mods to remove it. They would not. Sharon constantly comes running to edit the truth about andak, but will not edit what he says.
brraverishhh is offline


Old 08-14-2008, 02:31 AM   #2
MannoFr

Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
4,451
Senior Member
Default
It finally took a while but i found the posts.

I fully expect an apology from andak-defenders on IF who made statements to the effect that "he did not say that so cut it out" and otherwise defended andak as a moderate moslem. You know who you are!!
Speaking of "moderate" Muslims, Brigitte Gabriel's site just posted an interesting article about the perceived differences between (moderate) Islam and radical Islam:

“Radical Islam” is a Misnomer

THERE IS THE erroneous assertion that Radical Islam is not connected with mainstream (moderate) Islam in any way, that the religion of Islam has been “hijacked by a few extremists”, that the vast majority of Muslims do not agree with the Islamofascists. Such thinking is a terrible error and a grave threat to America’s national security, especially in this age of nuclear terrorism.

So what is Radical Islam and what should it be properly named? Radical Islam is actually the Islamic Military. The so-called radicals are not a fringe element; they are fully supported by the worldwide Islamic community (Ummah). If they were a fringe element, they would have been defeated long ago. The fight rages on because of strong support from the moderates both covertly and overtly. This means the Islamic Military (wrongly labeled radicals) is intimately connected with moderate Muslims who we have mistakenly labeled as innocent bystanders.

Moderate Muslims are not innocent bystanders. Moderate Muslims provide the base of operations which makes it possible for the Islamic Military to continue their terrorist operations. Hate America (an Islamic organization) demands to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Koran, and outbursts for Sharia law are preached openly from nearly every Mosque in America under the guise of freedom of speech and religion. Freedom of speech and religion has morphed into a weaponized tool of Islamic psychological warfare which is defeating America’s will to protect her national security. Any American who says Islam is less than perfect may become the victim of an unfair lawsuit by a “moderate” Muslim organization.

Moderate Muslims use two primary strategies to make conquest for Islam. The first is dawa, which is influence peddling, “wining and dining” and manipulation. There is a “ton” of Muslim oil money buying preferential treatment for Islam in America. The second is taqiyya, which is outright deception and lying. Deception and lying to infidels as a strategy of conquest is one of Islam’s most valued “weapons”, a precedent set by the prophet Mohammed himself. Americans hear this deception everyday with proclamations that “Islam is a religion of peace.” This phrase is an excellent example of successful psychological warfare which has caused Americans to let down their guard, and made us very vulnerable to future terrorist attacks, even possible nuclear attacks as several experts have pointed out.

Have you ever wondered why, so numerous the complaints worldwide, that Muslims are not assimilating into their host nation? It is because they are not there to assimilate — they are there to conqueror the host country for Islam as their Koran requires.

No Muslim dares to contradict the Koran because the penalty is — death and loss of personal salvation. The moderate Muslims of every nation, including those in America, fully support their Islamic military because worldwide conquest is the primary religious duty of all Muslims. Fellow Americans, if you believe that your local Muslims are not secretly harboring in their hearts an agenda for the conquest of America by Islam then you are dead wrong, and understand nothing about the Koran.

Read more:
http://blog.americancongressfortruth...is-a-misnomer/
MannoFr is offline


Old 08-16-2008, 08:14 AM   #3
Big A

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
50
Posts
4,148
Administrator
Default
And read at the VERY TOP of the same post. Or better yet, go to the rest of my 8000+ posts and see if anything else accords with that totally uncharacteristic view you are applying to me. But, this is the best you've got. Obviously if you had anything else, you'd be touting that instead of some out of context fragment of what I said many months ago.

You can't classify every Muslim with a gun as a terrorist. Many of their acts don't count as terrorism, though they may be human rights violations, or acts of our enemies. But to class them as terrorists in order to blur the distinction between political and religious conflicts is propaganda. When a group turns its sites at soldiers and government installations, it is no longer a terrorist activity, even when it is performed by a terrorist group.

That's right you lying scum. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS punishable to the full extent including capital punishment. But killing a captive soldier on contested ground is a war crime, not an act of terrorism. That's not justifying it in the least, anymore than distinguishing between rape and murder is a justification of either. We were arguing about terminology, not whether it is right or wrong. I realize you'd like the world to believe that every single Muslim with a gun standing on contested ground anywhere in the world is a terrorist, but that's a lie that's going to catch up with you.

I do not support ANY method of killing innocent civilians, nor is there a single post that you can twist to make it seem that way. I do not support the killing of captives. That is a war crime. Frankly, if the powers that be on this forum think that I do, go ahead and ban me. It won't mean that I do or that you were correct.

Hizbollah needs to be brought before the international court for war crimes it committed during the war in Lebanon. As well, they committed acts of terrorism by firing randomly at Israeli civilians.
Big A is offline


Old 08-16-2008, 06:00 PM   #4
tgs

Join Date
Mar 2007
Age
48
Posts
5,125
Senior Member
Default
I'd suggest you get ten more of your "recruits" to come in here and bash me. Maybe you can even get me alone in a room and show me how much moral high ground you've got.
I did not recruit anyone and I would not put my hands on you.
tgs is offline


Old 08-16-2008, 06:53 PM   #5
radikal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
54
Posts
4,523
Senior Member
Default
Muslims do not have to kill people to take over, political Islam is just as dangerous to the lives of non-Muslims as potential suicide bombers. Keep trying andak.. and welcome Horselady.
Thank you very much.

I've encountered worse than andak on other forums. I hope he takes a look at my blog noted here to see the side of Islam most Americans never get to see.
radikal is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity