LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-05-2008, 02:03 AM   #1
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default Q&A Session in East London Mosque
I didn't click the link. Is this recent?
Beerinkol is offline


Old 01-05-2008, 05:22 AM   #2
brraverishhh

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,127
Senior Member
Default
Oh yeah, the Al Qaida guy whose leader sits in prison. He represents the mainstream how? Put him in jail and throw away the key. Now what's the source of your transcript about rape? Not that video. And is the interviewee quoting the Sirah and Sunna or is that added separately? Why does the woman refer to "One eyed hooked Imam Hamza Mesri" this is a very peculiar way to talk. But that's OK, because the whole interview is a fake.
__________________ Anjem Choudhury of the Omar Bakri group of jihadists in Britain here appears on the BBC's Hard Talk . He is entirely ready to condemn attacks on innocent civilians, but he notes that because non-Muslims have rejected Islam, none of them are innocent. Therefore attacks like 9/11 and 7/7 are perfectly justified.
brraverishhh is offline


Old 02-04-2008, 11:05 AM   #3
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Andak, the fight for Al-Qaida in Afghanistan is still on, with Canada, the UK and other Nato-backed forces. However, that doesn't stop massive rallies by Muslims and other anti-war activists against Nato's involvement in Afghanistan calling it a "war on Islam".
Massive rallies? What about the massive rallies against terrorism with thousands of Muslims marching down the streets of Amman and Casablanca?

The above example shows that it's so easy to hijack Islam, simply because there are direct commands in the Quran to behead, crucify and mutilate infidels. It may have been used in a different context, but you can't deny it exists. You could bring up the OT and the laws of Duetronomy, but these have been appended between 200-500 AD. You can't have it both ways. You can't argue half the time that Islam is easy to hijack and then argue that Islam hasn't been hijacked and that everything Al Qaida says are core beliefs. Either it was hijacked or it wasn't. I say it was hijacked, and once you admit that, you can't look upon me as though I hold views that I don't.
softy54534 is offline


Old 02-04-2008, 12:42 PM   #4
9mm_fan

Join Date
May 2007
Age
54
Posts
5,191
Senior Member
Default
I don't get it. What's the connection between the idiot being interviewed in the youtube clip and the Abdul Makin?
9mm_fan is offline


Old 02-04-2008, 01:06 PM   #5
Paul Bunyan

Join Date
Jul 2007
Age
58
Posts
4,495
Senior Member
Default
They're both from the same East London Mosque.
I don't know, I'm not at all knowledgeable in matters of Mosque usage or the chain of command within a U.K. Mosque but I get the impression that a U.K. Mosque is sort of like a hotel conference room.

Perhaps someone with a better insight into Mosques could shed some light upon who is responsible for what gets said in a Mosque.

If the transcript referencing Abdul Makin is true then the Jacqui Smith should instantly ban another member of the Likud party from ever visiting the U.K.

Anjum Chaudri's foul rant about killing innocent people should also result in the banning of another member of the Likud party.

Inter community violence and all that.

In other news I see Muslims now control the British weather. It's either Sunni or Shiite. h/t The Bishop.
Paul Bunyan is offline


Old 02-04-2008, 01:39 PM   #6
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
I am not interested. Arabs are third-world idiots.
Beerinkol is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity