[MannoFr]

"napalm gaza."

Fun ordnance note:

"Nape" doesn't go through concrete buildings very well.

Thermobaric or large conventional bombs are more suitable for razing cities. That's obviously why Russia has developed them. There is no reason to fight hand-to-hand in urban terrain when you can destroy it. With large thermobaric weapons, Grozny (for example) could have been flattened from the air and any areas where rebels tried to "play Stalingrad" from the rubble could easily have been wiped out. Normal bombs in the tiny quantities delivered nowadays aren't good for destroying area targets. That's a severe drawback of precision munitions.

[MannoFr]

Just trolling? Maybe you'd be happier somewhere else?

[tgs]

Why no one questioned or criticized the volley of hundreds of Qassam Rockets which is aimed at civilians -children, old men/women- in Israel?

Also I want to share this video
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/252068...ket_in_un_car/

[Lillie_Steins]

It is an utter waste of time to ask those sorts of questions. The response should be more ferocious than the attack, and there should be no limit to escalation until the enemy is destroyed. If the enemy can absorb the casualties that are inflicted, then kill more until they lose interest. That is basic to war.

War? There's a war on? Who declared it? The current small-scale rocket exchange between Israel and the Palis is a "war" in the mildest sense of the word.

Now I know I will hear people respond with "yeah, and that's why there is no peace."

Okay, what now?