[S.T.D.]

India is an example for the rest of the world not to follow.

True. But lets not judge the victims too harshly. Gandi and his cabal had every chance to boot every single moslem out india. Lest the taqqiya go nuts, remember that paki nation was founded as an islamic republic for un-partitioned moslems of india. Then why the heck did not all of them go to pak-stan? Pakisatan promply went on a genocidal rampage, for which ample evidence/support can be found in islamic religious texts and in the acts of its one prophet, to wipe out all hindus/sikhs/buddhists from pakisatan. Banglidesh (sp?) is doing the same, and its hindu/buddhist population there is now half what it was in the 1940's. Only in india has the moslem popn surged from 8 to now 15%. These are now like a freakin stone around india's neck. secularism is great and all that, but not at the cost of survival. And that is what every indian is learning with every new islam terror attacks against the hindus of india.

The pols are among the most corrupt on the planet and would sell the mothers to stay in power. the islamic vote that tends to vote en masse is crucial to congress staying in power as well as the continued fractured nature of the hindu vote, especially the liberal hindu who still idiotically believes that an accomodation can be reached with islams hordes in india.

[HedgeYourBets]

India and Pakistan DID attempt to separate from one another ethnically. That's why India, Pakistan and Bangladesh exist. Of course it also resulted in the deaths of 10 million people. Learning not to exterminate one another is usually the better option.

[Lillie_Steins]

India and Pakistan DID attempt to separate from one another ethnically. That's why India, Pakistan and Bangladesh exist. Of course it also resulted in the deaths of 10 million people. Learning not to exterminate one another is usually the better option.

Oh really. Then please explain how porkistan, which had about 8-10% hindus and buddhists (some cities like Lahore were almost 50% hindus/sikhs), HAVE VIRTUALLY NO HINDUS AND BUDDHISTS TODAY. THEIR COMBINED POPULATION IS LESS THAN 0.1%. IN BANGADESH, THE % OF HINDUS/SIKHS ETC HAS GONE DOWN FROM 8-10% TO ABOUT 4% TODAY.

IN INDIA, THE MOSLEMS HAVE EXPLODED FROM ABOUT 8% TO 15%, WITH MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL BANGLADESHIS AND PAKIS IN INDIA.

So, let me get this straight. according to you, islam has the right to wipe out its non-islamic minorities, while non-islamic majorities CANNOT return the favor. That would be intolerant.

Is there no depth to which your dhimmitude will sink? As a jew, i expected more sense.

PS. Do we hear any condemnation of islamic states for wiping out their non-islamic minorities?? And pray tell, why cant the victims STRIKE BACK IN EQUAL MEASURE??

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

Is that why Europeans adopted a number system that was brought from India by the Arabs?

The past does not change all the problems that Muslims are causing now, does it? More and more Europeans are speaking out against Muslim immigration.

[Peptobismol]

Wrong, in the past there were no nukes. Let the Muslims keep the hate in Islamic countries.

Who invented nukes? Muslims or non-Muslims? By what ratio?
Who owns more nukes? Muslims or non-Muslims?
Who used more nukes? Muslims or non-Muslims?
Who seeks new ways to use nukes in conventional warfare? Muslims or non-Muslims?
Who killed more civilians by using nukes? Muslims or non-Muslims? How many civilians was that?