LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-04-2011, 04:49 AM   #1
Baromaro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default Bad, Bad, Bad News From Afghanistan
ahoy me friends, hail to ye all!

a few years ago...actually, more like a decade ago (its kinda strange sayin' that, hath it been that long?), i was a fervent supporter 'o our military action in Afghanistan.

i believed our cause was righteous no matter who the skipper was on our bridge, be it President Bush, or the our current captain, President Obama.

recently though, i've lost me faith, and am unclear what we're doin' thar and why we're stayin'. i know thar hath been a yearnin' amongst many here on USPO that our country just lay down a rain 'o fire and stop pussyfootin' around thar, and Mr. Obama hath certainly been more forceful (i was goin' to say "ruthless", but thats kinda a pejorative term, aye?) in pursuein' our national intrests, fer sure.

but when i reads news like this, it just seems like madness be takin' place in that faraway land;
Nine boys collecting firewood to heat their homes in the eastern Afghanistan mountains were killed by NATO helicopter gunners who mistook them for insurgents, according to a statement on Wednesday by NATO, which apologized for the mistake.

The boys, who were 9 to 15 years old, were attacked on Tuesday in what amounted to one of the war’s worst cases of mistaken killings by foreign-led forces. The victims included two sets of brothers. A 10th boy survived.

News of the attack enraged Afghans and led to an anti-American demonstration on Wednesday in the village of Nanglam, where the boys were from. The only survivor, Hemad, 11, said his mother had told him to go out with other boys to collect firewood because “the weather is very cold now.”

“As soon as we heard about the attack on the village’s children, all the village men rushed to the mountains to find out what really happened,” said Ashabuddin, a shopkeeper from Manogai, a nearby village, whose nephew Khalid was among those killed.

“Finally we found the dead bodies. Some of the dead bodies were really badly chopped up by the rockets,” he said. “The head of a child was missing. Others were missing limbs.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/wo...R_AP_LO_MST_FB

whilst some 'o our more hardened swabby's who sail with us here on USPO might shrug and say, "what do you expect? war is hell!", i hafta wonder how many terrorists our mighty NATO forces created the moment we blew them nine children into piles 'o meat, bone and viscera.

aye...

- MeadHallPirate
Baromaro is offline


Old 02-04-2011, 05:11 AM   #2
GreefeWrereon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
Sadly, even if those boys were shot while placing mines, shooting Americans, and raping nuns the propaganda outcome would be the same. There is no way we can win. None. We are not wanted there, we are doing no good there, and we have no future there.

I am a Democrat, but Obama has really screwed the pooch on this one.
GreefeWrereon is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 09:47 AM   #3
Gremlinn

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
I say, pull out of Afganistan, STAT and totally, and use some of those troops to beef up the southern border of USA.
Gremlinn is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 12:15 PM   #4
ethigSmimbine

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
ahoy me friends, hail to ye all!

a few years ago...actually, more like a decade ago (its kinda strange sayin' that, hath it been that long?), i was a fervent supporter 'o our military action in Afghanistan.

i believed our cause was righteous no matter who the skipper was on our bridge, be it President Bush, or the our current captain, President Obama.

recently though, i've lost me faith, and am unclear what we're doin' thar and why we're stayin'. i know thar hath been a yearnin' amongst many here on USPO that our country just lay down a rain 'o fire and stop pussyfootin' around thar, and Mr. Obama hath certainly been more forceful (i was goin' to say "ruthless", but thats kinda a pejorative term, aye?) in pursuein' our national intrests, fer sure.

but when i reads news like this, it just seems like madness be takin' place in that faraway land;
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/wo...R_AP_LO_MST_FB

whilst some 'o our more hardened swabby's who sail with us here on USPO might shrug and say, "what do you expect? war is hell!", i hafta wonder how many terrorists our mighty NATO forces created the moment we blew them nine children into piles 'o meat, bone and viscera.

aye...

- MeadHallPirate
This is part of the sad, dirty face of war, my friend. Mistakes happen and there are consequences. That said, we shouldn't let mistakes or the threat of them weaken our resolve or keep us from doing what must be done.
ethigSmimbine is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 01:51 PM   #5
babopeddy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
This is part of the sad, dirty face of war, my friend. Mistakes happen and there are consequences. That said, we shouldn't let mistakes or the threat of them weaken our resolve or keep us from doing what must be done.
It is entirely unclear to most people how these helicopter pilots were doing what must be done.

What is the strategy here? Shoot anything that might be suspicious in the dark without any confirmation of wrong doing?

This sounds like precisely what must not be done....

The slaughter of these 9 children comes right after 73 civilians (more than 30 children) were slaughtered over the past week.

NATO apologizes for Afghan civilian deaths - Arab News

The entire operation is ridiculously stupid and cruel and produces no significant long lasting meaningful results.

Andrew
babopeddy is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 01:58 PM   #6
Lauramalina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Good Lord.

Lauramalina is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 01:59 PM   #7
Triiooman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
554
Senior Member
Default
It is entirely unclear to most people how these helicopter pilots were doing what must be done.

What is the strategy here? Shoot anything that might be suspicious in the dark without any confirmation of wrong doing?

This sounds like precisely what must not be done....

The slaughter of these 9 children comes right after 73 civilians (more than 30 children) were slaughtered over the past week.

NATO apologizes for Afghan civilian deaths - Arab News

The entire operation is ridiculously stupid and cruel and produces no significant long lasting meaningful results.

Andrew
Andrew,

This sucks and I wish we were out of Afghanistan but we aren't out of Afghanistan so the soldiers, marines, airman, and swabbies have to do their job. These accidents are tragic and we wish they wouldn't happen. The problem is that those we are forced to fight (by the command of our elected civilian officials, yes, that includes Obama and his surge) don't wear uniforms or stay on military bases. They hide amoungst civilians, dressed as civilians, and act like civilians. When the target isn't clear these kinds of mistakes are inevitable. Those who are truly at fault are the native Afghani insurgents.
Triiooman is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:06 PM   #8
poRmawayncmop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
664
Senior Member
Default
ahoy me friends, hail to ye all!

a few years ago...actually, more like a decade ago (its kinda strange sayin' that, hath it been that long?), i was a fervent supporter 'o our military action in Afghanistan.

i believed our cause was righteous no matter who the skipper was on our bridge, be it President Bush, or the our current captain, President Obama.

recently though, i've lost me faith, and am unclear what we're doin' thar and why we're stayin'. i know thar hath been a yearnin' amongst many here on USPO that our country just lay down a rain 'o fire and stop pussyfootin' around thar, and Mr. Obama hath certainly been more forceful (i was goin' to say "ruthless", but thats kinda a pejorative term, aye?) in pursuein' our national intrests, fer sure.

but when i reads news like this, it just seems like madness be takin' place in that faraway land;
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/wo...R_AP_LO_MST_FB

whilst some 'o our more hardened swabby's who sail with us here on USPO might shrug and say, "what do you expect? war is hell!", i hafta wonder how many terrorists our mighty NATO forces created the moment we blew them nine children into piles 'o meat, bone and viscera.

aye...

- MeadHallPirate
Yes, we may very well be creating more terroists than we actually kill in this war. Dimenishing returns and all that jazz. That may be the actual reality here.
poRmawayncmop is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:08 PM   #9
ricochettty

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
521
Senior Member
Default
Andrew,

This sucks and I wish we were out of Afghanistan but we aren't out of Afghanistan so the soldiers, marines, airman, and swabbies have to do their job. These accidents are tragic and we wish they wouldn't happen. The problem is that those we are forced to fight (by the command of our elected civilian officials, yes, that includes Obama and his surge) don't wear uniforms or stay on military bases. They hide amoungst civilians, dressed as civilians, and act like civilians. When the target isn't clear these kinds of mistakes are inevitable. Those who are truly at fault are the native Afghani insurgents.
As far as im concerned this is not about the soldiers at all - it is about strategy. The strategy is stupid.

Andrew
ricochettty is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:09 PM   #10
CevepBiageCefm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
589
Senior Member
Default
So what is it that "must be done" or is our "job" over there? Seriously, I haven't heard the president articulate what our ongoing mission over there is. What are the parents of our troops being told their kids are dying for? The complacency of this nation about troops dying overseas is terrible. We need to get the fuck out.
CevepBiageCefm is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:13 PM   #11
Overlord

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
608
Senior Member
Default
So what is it that "must be done" or is our "job" over there? Seriously, I haven't heard the president articulate what our ongoing mission over there is. What are the parents of our troops being told their kids are dying for? The complacency of this nation about troops dying overseas is terrible. We need to get the fuck out.
Exactly. All i hear from elected officials, military commanders, and others who support this war is empty sloganeering. I.e., "what must be done!". What the fuck does that mean? I don't see results, i just see senseless death and destruction.
Overlord is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:14 PM   #12
reachmanxx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
542
Senior Member
Default
Sadly, even if those boys were shot while placing mines, shooting Americans, and raping nuns the propaganda outcome would be the same. There is no way we can win. None. We are not wanted there, we are doing no good there, and we have no future there.
While the propaganda point you make is true, we could in fact win in Afghanistan... but we won't ever do what it would take. Then again, we barely got it done in Iraq and likely wouldn't do it anywhere else.

I am a Democrat, but Obama has really screwed the pooch on this one.
Thanks for coming out of the closet... I for one appreciate it.
reachmanxx is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:15 PM   #13
ignonsoli

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
As far as im concerned this is not about the soldiers at all - it is about strategy. The strategy is stupid.

Andrew
If by strategy you mean leaving immediately then, yes, I agree. If you're talking about strategy in continued operations, I'm sorry, but you don't know enough on the topic to voice an opinion if you think we can keep this from happening. Like I said, you can't keep from these kinds of things happening when the enemy intentionally uses civilians as a shield.
ignonsoli is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:18 PM   #14
luffyplayaz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
While the propaganda point you make is true, we could in fact win in Afghanistan... but we won't ever do what it would take.
More meaningless slogans....

Then again, we barely got it done in Iraq and likely wouldn't do it anywhere else. Nothing "got done" in iraq. It remains one of the most violent dysfunctional countries in the world and there is no sign of that changing.


Andrew
luffyplayaz is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:30 PM   #15
GroosteFoessy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
If by strategy you mean leaving immediately then, yes, I agree. If you're talking about strategy in continued operations, I'm sorry, but you don't know enough on the topic to voice an opinion if you think we can keep this from happening. Like I said, you can't keep from these kinds of things happening when the enemy intentionally uses civilians as a shield.
I disagree. NATO itself has called it a "terrible mistake" - not the unfortunate result of civilians being used as shields. It was simply an outright failure. In fact, if Petraeus is to be believed, this was a violation of his rules of engagement.

By strategy i mean it is stupid to think you can solve the problem of islamic terrorism by shooting blindly in the dark. What NATO is doing is clearly the acts of a coalition that is confused - so they are doing the only thing they know how to do - kill.

It was time to leave years ago.

Andrew
GroosteFoessy is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 02:36 PM   #16
Vzkdgdqx

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
I disagree. NATO itself has called it a "terrible mistake" - not the unfortunate result of civilians being used as shields. It was simply an outright failure. In fact, if Petraeus is to be believed, this was a violation of his rules of engagement.

By strategy i mean it is stupid to think you can solve the problem of islamic terrorism by shooting blindly in the dark. What NATO is doing is clearly the acts of a coalition that is confused - so they are doing the only thing they know how to do - kill.
I can see how someone who has never been would think that. You are looking at something you don't understand from afar and trying to make sense out of it.

This is war, Andrew. Mistakes, terrible mistakes, happen. As I have said before, this is the ugly side of war. If you don't like the look of it, then don't look. In the end the fact remains that are there and, as long as we are there, the war needs to be fought. Even if it upsets the sensibilities of the ignorant.

It was time to leave years ago.
Agreed. I don't think the Afghanis are worth the blood that is being spilled for them.
Vzkdgdqx is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 03:06 PM   #17
TXmjLW9b

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
361
Senior Member
Default
I can see how someone who has never been would think that. You are looking at something you don't understand from afar and trying to make sense out of it.
That is becoming a tired refrain Thor. The fact remains that a decade on islamic terrorism has spread and not diminished, Afghanistan is still a shit hole, and there is no meaningful or lasting results anybody can point to - having been there or not. Like it or not Thor, we live in a democracy and the citizens of that democracy have to be pleased with the effort and we can choose to replace those politicians who are not delivering results.

Besides, you always make it sound like there is some deep mystery to understand in war - there is not. Its just people killing people. Its simple and it is easy to make sens out of it.

This is war, Andrew. Mistakes, terrible mistakes, happen. As I have said before, this is the ugly side of war. If you don't like the look of it, then don't look. In the end the fact remains that are there and, as long as we are there, the war needs to be fought. Even if it upsets the sensibilities of the ignorant. Just because war is ugly and mistakes happen does not mean it cannot be harshly criticized for lack of results or for its idiotic cruelty. As a citizen of a country that uses my money to pay for this ongoing tragedy it is my duty to criticize it and to never let up criticizing it until either they leave or results or achieved.

Sorry Thor, but it sounds like you are copying and pasting your comments from a book of military slogans. Just more meaningless words that do not change the reality of the situation.


Agreed. I don't think the Afghanis are worth the blood that is being spilled for them. On the contrary, the blood of these children is worth more than the blood of those who foolishly die and kill for empire/corporations ever will be.

Andrew
TXmjLW9b is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 03:18 PM   #18
Gvadelunar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
Agreed. I don't think the Afghanis are worth the blood that is being spilled for them.
hail ThorHammer,

*drops his anchor and orders his sails lowered*

*checks his hearin' and grinds his knuckles into his eyeballs*

hold on, me friend...could ye repeat that? i can't quite believe what ye just said...

are ye sayin' that we're spillin' blood and spendin' trillions fer the well bein' 'o the citizens 'o Afghanistan? this be the mission???

- MeadHallPirate
Gvadelunar is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 03:20 PM   #19
WepKeyday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
523
Senior Member
Default
I have a tough tiime getting bent about the inadvertant killing of a handful of Afghan kids.

It wasn't intentional and those boys were only going to get raped by village elders for the next couple years of their life anyway - before they settled down to become Afghanistan's next generation of child molestors, wife beaters, and heroine manufacturers.

At least one or two of them probably would have made an effort over the next couple years to wound or kill Americans or to serve those who would, if they hadn't already been involved in some degree of insurgency.

That said, I agree that it's stupid thhat we have any troops there at all - strafing kids or otherwise.

Everything that needed doing in Afghanistan was done by about the middle of January, 2002.

Having kept troops there one minute longer was retarded.

Both Bush, and now Obama, are retarded CinCs.
WepKeyday is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 03:26 PM   #20
EscaCsamas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Besides, you always make it sound like there is some deep mystery to understand in war - there is not. Its just people killing people. Its simple and it is easy to make sens out of it.
And I can see how easy it is for someone who has never been to war to think like that.

Just because war is ugly and mistakes happen does not mean it cannot be harshly criticized for lack of results or for its idiotic cruelty. As a citizen of a country that uses my money to pay for this ongoing tragedy it is my duty to criticize it and to never let up criticizing it until either they leave or results or achieved.
Go a head and criticise, I have no problem with that at all. Just don't get all pissy when those of use who have been at the sharp end of the spear laugh you off.

Sorry Thor, but it sounds like you are copying and pasting your comments from a book of military slogans. Just more meaningless words that do not change the reality of the situation.
You want to lecture me, someone who has been in that reality, as to what is really going down and what it is like?
EscaCsamas is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity