LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-03-2010, 10:31 PM   #5
Aozozbag

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Interesting argument. I can understand the logic behind it but I'm curious if there is any data to support it. I just don't see a nuke attack being delivered by bombers but countries would still need to have air defences in the event of non nuclear aerial attack wouldn't they?
yes but you need to ask Gorbachev, right after he heard that knock on his door and the news that a german civilian cessna aircraft had just flown through the heart of the PVO ( Russian air defense system) on the most direct route to land in Red Square. And then pondering Reagans go ahead with stealth technology which he knew to be real and workable......
Aozozbag is offline




« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity