LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #21
stuck_in_WA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
That could, and would, be construed as an act of war...
Yeah, so. NK needs to get it. They don't get it yet: they won't go to war with us, they know better than that.
stuck_in_WA is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #22
Sxscdergh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
Aren't we still technically at war with them?
Sxscdergh is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #23
yQvpyNt3

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
Aren't we still technically at war with them?
Oh. Good point.

But the NK government is clearly not desperate. What happens if they do get desperate? Sending their brain-washed cannon fodder across the DMZ?
yQvpyNt3 is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #24
patuvammnogoo

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
575
Senior Member
Default
Oh. Good point.

But the NK government is clearly not desperate. What happens if they do get desperate? Sending their brain-washed cannon fodder across the DMZ?
bolded the operative words there cannon fodder implies their troops are good for nothing but dying in the meat grinder. We happen to have an exceptional meat grinder.
patuvammnogoo is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #25
imporesweemo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
385
Senior Member
Default
bolded the operative words there cannon fodder implies their troops are good for nothing but dying in the meat grinder. We happen to have an exceptional meat grinder.
And we'll get tons of satisfaction out of slaughtering a bunch of brainwashed troops.
imporesweemo is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #26
allaboutauto.us

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
454
Senior Member
Default
Aren't we still technically at war with them?
Not really.

Our defense pact with South Korea covers things like mutual defense, but we have never declaired war against the nation of North Korea (hence, it was called a "Peace Action").

However, the nations of North and South Korea are still technically in a state of war. This is currently both the longest war, and the longest cease fire in the world.
allaboutauto.us is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #27
popillio

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
497
Senior Member
Default
And we'll get tons of satisfaction out of slaughtering a bunch of brainwashed troops.
awwwww poor enemy soldiers attacking my citizen soldiers and baying for their blood

its war donkey, its not supposed to be puppy dogs and blowjobs. maybe if enough of them get killed they'll snap out of licking kim jong il's ballsack and effect some change in their government. until then, any one of them that crosses the DMZ with warlike purpose gets several holes blown in him.
popillio is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #28
kiosokkn

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Before anybody thinks an invasion by North Korea would just be a slaughter of NK troops, look at the map. So goes Seoul, so goes South Korea. It is the economic engine of the country and residence of about a third of their population. It's only 15 miles or so from the DMZ. The North Koreans have a standing army of about 2 milllion men last time I looked. It would certainly be a bloodbath, mostly South Korean civilians, and they would obliterate Seoul before we could turn them back. This is the threat the NK's have been hanging over our heads for decades. There may be a ceasefire in place, but it is routinely broken.
kiosokkn is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #29
defenderfors

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
Real heavy duty sanctions will have the effect of laying siege to that country. China's non-support would cover the north wall as well. NK is too weak to engage anyone. So, I think that soime real pressure will do the trick.
China is not going to support stiff sanctions against NK because of their nuclear tests. They will support region stability, which was one of the goals of the six party talks. Furthermore, China does not exactly trust the Obama admin with is increasing "anti-Chinese" stance in the Admin trade war.

When China does not speak is a time to worry, not before or after.

Granted NK has to improve its willingness to be at the peace table, which is what the Obama admin has stated (and I agree), but this Western style direct action will backfire badly. Indirect action, through targeted sanctions not to hurt the people of NK with strong suggestions to China that this will improve the region is the only course to go.
defenderfors is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #30
kHy87gPC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Yesterday they proposed a meeting for discussing restarting tours to Mount Kumgang. But today they suddenly changed their attitude and denounsed South Korea with the threat of a holy retalitary war. They even said they would bomb out the presidential residence. By the way they want to accept the aid of 10,000 tons of corn from South Korea as it was plannned. Isn't it funny?

http://www.independent.co.kr/data/bb...1263717055.jpg
kHy87gPC is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #31
aburva.org

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
Before anybody thinks an invasion by North Korea would just be a slaughter of NK troops, look at the map. So goes Seoul, so goes South Korea.
You seem to be forgetting something.

In the Korean War, Seoul fell to the North not just once, but twice. And at the end of the war it was virtually destroyed. It took decades to fully rebuild all of the damage from the war.

Assuming that the capture of the capitol would end the war would be ignoring history.
aburva.org is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity