Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
Oh. Good point. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
Aren't we still technically at war with them? Our defense pact with South Korea covers things like mutual defense, but we have never declaired war against the nation of North Korea (hence, it was called a "Peace Action"). However, the nations of North and South Korea are still technically in a state of war. This is currently both the longest war, and the longest cease fire in the world. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
And we'll get tons of satisfaction out of slaughtering a bunch of brainwashed troops. ![]() its war donkey, its not supposed to be puppy dogs and blowjobs. maybe if enough of them get killed they'll snap out of licking kim jong il's ballsack and effect some change in their government. until then, any one of them that crosses the DMZ with warlike purpose gets several holes blown in him. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
Before anybody thinks an invasion by North Korea would just be a slaughter of NK troops, look at the map. So goes Seoul, so goes South Korea. It is the economic engine of the country and residence of about a third of their population. It's only 15 miles or so from the DMZ. The North Koreans have a standing army of about 2 milllion men last time I looked. It would certainly be a bloodbath, mostly South Korean civilians, and they would obliterate Seoul before we could turn them back. This is the threat the NK's have been hanging over our heads for decades. There may be a ceasefire in place, but it is routinely broken.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Real heavy duty sanctions will have the effect of laying siege to that country. China's non-support would cover the north wall as well. NK is too weak to engage anyone. So, I think that soime real pressure will do the trick. When China does not speak is a time to worry, not before or after. Granted NK has to improve its willingness to be at the peace table, which is what the Obama admin has stated (and I agree), but this Western style direct action will backfire badly. Indirect action, through targeted sanctions not to hurt the people of NK with strong suggestions to China that this will improve the region is the only course to go. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
Yesterday they proposed a meeting for discussing restarting tours to Mount Kumgang. But today they suddenly changed their attitude and denounsed South Korea with the threat of a holy retalitary war. They even said they would bomb out the presidential residence. By the way they want to accept the aid of 10,000 tons of corn from South Korea as it was plannned. Isn't it funny?
http://www.independent.co.kr/data/bb...1263717055.jpg |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
Before anybody thinks an invasion by North Korea would just be a slaughter of NK troops, look at the map. So goes Seoul, so goes South Korea. In the Korean War, Seoul fell to the North not just once, but twice. And at the end of the war it was virtually destroyed. It took decades to fully rebuild all of the damage from the war. Assuming that the capture of the capitol would end the war would be ignoring history. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|