LOGO
Terrorism Discuss the War on Terrorism

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-06-2009, 08:57 PM   #1
TodeImmabbedo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default GWOT Over?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...home_headlines

It's official. The U.S. is no longer engaged in a "war on terrorism." Neither is it fighting "jihadists" or in a "global war."

President Obama's top homeland security and counterterrorism official took all three terms off the table of acceptable words inside the White House during a speech Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.

"The President does not describe this as a 'war on terrorism,'" said John Brennan, head of the White House homeland security office, who outlined a "new way of seeing" the fight against terrorism.

The only terminology that Mr. Brennan said the administration is using is that the U.S. is "at war with al Qaeda."

"We are at war with al Qaeda," he said. "We are at war with its violent extremist allies who seek to carry on al Qaeda's murderous agenda."

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in March that the administration was not using the term "war on terror" but no specific directive had come from the White House itself. Mr. Obama himself used the term "war on terror" on Jan. 23, his fourth day as president, but has not used it since.

Mr. Brennan's speech was aimed at outlining ways in which the Obama administration intends to undermine the "upstream" factors that create an environment in which terrorists are bred.

The president's adviser talked about increasing aid to foreign governments for building up their militaries and social and democratic institutions, but provided few details about how the White House will do that.

He was specific about ways in which Mr. Obama believes words influence the way America prosecutes the fight against terrorism.

Mr. Brennan said that to say the U.S. is fighting "jihadists" is wrongheaded because it is using "a legitimate term, 'jihad,' meaning to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal" which "risks giving these murderers the religious legitimacy they desperately seek but in no way deserve."

"Worse, it risks reinforcing the idea that the United States is somehow at war with Islam itself," Mr. Brennan said.

As for the "war on terrorism," Mr. Brennan said the administration is not going to say that "because 'terrorism' is but a tactic — a means to an end, which in al Qaedas case is global domination by an Islamic caliphate."

"You can never fully defeat a tactic like terrorism any more than you can defeat the tactic of war itself," Mr. Brennan said.

He also said that to call the fight against al Qaeda and other terrorist groups — which he said remains "a dynamic and evolving threat" — should not be called "a global war."

While Mr. Brennan acknowledged that al Qaeda and its affiliates are active in countries throughout the Middle East and Africa, he also said that "portraying this as a 'global' war risks reinforcing the very image that al Qaeda seeks to project of itself — that it is a highly organized, global entity capable of replacing sovereign nations with a global caliphate."

The president's adviser said that in discussing counter terror operations, Mr. Obama "has encouraged us to be even more aggressive, even more proactive, and even more innovative" than they have been proposing.

But Mr. Brennan lamented "inflammatory rhetoric, hyperbole, and intellectual narrowness" surrounding the national security debate and said Mr. Obama has views that are "nuanced, not simplistic; practical, not ideological."
TodeImmabbedo is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 08:59 PM   #2
Enjoymmsq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
So now we can coin PC references to terrorists but people against socialised medicine are Nazis?
Enjoymmsq is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 09:06 PM   #3
Ufkkrxcq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
359
Senior Member
Default
Here I thought we were involved in "Overseas Contingency Operations."
Ufkkrxcq is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 09:06 PM   #4
JonnTEN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default
So now we can coin PC references to terrorists but people against socialised medicine are Nazis?
I reported myself to the flag@whitehouse.gov site last night. If I repeated most of it, Alice would bury me in the shed up to my ankles - head down.

Note to self - do not e-mail the Whitehouse after a couple of cocktails.
JonnTEN is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 09:08 PM   #5
Enjoymmsq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
Awww BS, you can't say something like that and then NOT share. Not cool.....
Enjoymmsq is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 09:10 PM   #6
ffflyer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
Awww BS, you can't say something like that and then NOT share. Not cool.....
Maybe I'll post excerpts "somewhere else".
ffflyer is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 09:17 PM   #7
chelviweeme

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
*clapping* oh goodie.
chelviweeme is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 11:24 PM   #8
itaspCatCriny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
Guess our priorities as Americans have really gone in the toilet.
itaspCatCriny is offline


Old 08-06-2009, 11:44 PM   #9
WaydayNef

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
Does this mean I don't get GWOT money for my new gigantic monitor for my office?


bummer...
WaydayNef is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 03:14 PM   #10
unmalryAlalry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
Guess that means no more GWOT medals either.
unmalryAlalry is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 03:15 PM   #11
soprofaxel

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Guess that means no more GWOT medals either.
....and are they going to re-name the ones already awarded?
soprofaxel is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 03:39 PM   #12
flueftArete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
GWOT Over?

Did we win? Or do I need to turn myself in to our new Taliban overlords, learn to speak Dari, and marry a goat?
flueftArete is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 03:48 PM   #13
heltduell

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
GWOT Over?

Did we win? Or do I need to turn myself in to our new Taliban overlords, learn to speak Dari, and marry a goat?
Mr Tumnus?
heltduell is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 04:00 PM   #14
JRixlcvF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Mr Tumnus?
Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
JRixlcvF is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 06:33 PM   #15
frequensearules

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
Hey I want my AWWAQ medals!!!!!
frequensearules is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 07:12 PM   #16
boffincash

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
643
Senior Member
Default
So....then what the hell is going on in Iraq?
boffincash is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 08:02 PM   #17
Imiweevierm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
670
Senior Member
Default
I heard they were going to make it into a resort.
Imiweevierm is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 08:41 PM   #18
GinaIsWild

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
Disney in the Desert.....hehe...IED mountain, Saddam's Magic Castle, etc.
GinaIsWild is offline


Old 08-07-2009, 08:49 PM   #19
Gremlinn

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
it's going to be a R&R for people doing the 365 in the Stan
Gremlinn is offline


Old 08-08-2009, 06:52 AM   #20
23InetrySypekek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
This is old news.

Terrorism ended when GW left the office. Mission accomplished.

Now we just have man made disasters.
23InetrySypekek is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:39 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity