[Dynasty]

Our politicians are supposed to work for us in keeping the country on track, and that includes refining and making new laws.

Yep that is what 'they are suppose to do' if you say so ... its turned out great hasn't it?

I know, I know .... It's Booooshs & the GOPs fault

Also, the 'they're trying to make us socialists blah blah' is just weak. If you're a diehard anti-socialism fanatic then stand your ground and don't go to any type of schooling,

Once I am no longer FORCED to fund public schools I would gladly send my kids to private .. nice red herring

ever take out any government backed student financial aid, Hasn't Govt has made that difficult considering that they legislated their monopoly on college financing?

or engage in any government backed service. That'll stick it to them! We could only dream of ending govt backed services

[Badyalectlawl]

She's right about what you called 'original laws'. They were pretty awful. Perhaps you shouldn't have mentioned them at all, if they are not what you meant. Our politicians are supposed to work for us in keeping the country on track, and that includes refining and making new laws.

Also, the 'they're trying to make us socialists blah blah' is just weak. If you're a diehard anti-socialism fanatic then stand your ground and don't go to any type of schooling, ever take out any government backed student financial aid, or engage in any government backed service. That'll stick it to them!

awww, that's cute...now you are the arbiter of what is 'right'? get over yourself, this land was built of the laws of the constitution, and these idiots are trying to erase those rights. But if it makes you all feel snuggly in your beds at night that big momma gov't is watching over you and they know what is best...
As for you getting hung up on what i meant or didn't mean when mentioning "original laws", you need to realize the big picture and not get caught up in the fine print so to speak. Here is a question for you, do you have an issue with the constitution?

In response to your last statement about socialism...are you saying you like socialism??

[somamasoso]

awww, that's cute...now you are the arbiter of what is 'right'? get over yourself,

Obviously, my recollection of American History is better than your's, so in this case, yes.

Go back to school and read a book.
this land was built of the laws of the constitution, and these idiots are trying to erase those rights. What rights? Name 3 that they're trying to erase.

Btw, this land was built on the bodies of it's original inhabitants, but again, you don't seem to know much about that whole "history" thing.

As for you getting hung up on what i meant or didn't mean when mentioning "original laws", you need to realize the big picture and not get caught up in the fine print so to speak. Here is a question for you, do you have an issue with the constitution? That question is so stupid as to not deserve an answer.

In response to your last statement about socialism...are you saying you like socialism?? Do you even know what socialism is? Have you even been to a socialist country? I doubt that the answer is yes on either question.

[Doncarlito]

huh...so you mr morley are comfortable living in a country with so many laws? what is wrong with the original laws of this land?

I know someone already answered for me, but I love living in a country where black people are counted as a whole person, women can vote, and I don't have to worry about being burned at the stake for not believeing iin the Invisible Sky Wizard.

Funny thing is I could give two sihts abt how many laws are in this land AS LONG as they are at the state level 9not the centralized govt that we have now0 .. as originally intended by our founding fathers.

You mean Frankin, Hamilton, and the rest of the Federalists? Or when you say "Founding Fathers" do you really mean "Only the Founding Fathers I agree with"?

[Hixinfineedom]

In response to your last statement about socialism...are you saying you like socialism??

I like Socialism. Having watch the "Libertarian" Right attempt to destroy this nation over the last decade has actually pushed me further to the Left. The harder you fight for your bizarre notion of "freedom" the more reactionaries like myself you create.

[Buincchotourbss]

Funny thing is I could give two sihts abt how many laws are in this land AS LONG as they are at the state level 9not the centralized govt that we have now0 .. as originally intended by our founding fathers.

Then I can decide which state I deem free enough to live and raise my family.

Which Founding Fathers, Jack? The ones who wrote that the union was "perpetual" and that "Every State shall abide by the determination of the united States in congress assembled"?

Or he ones who wrote that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Or the ones that wrote "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Or the ones that write that Congress has the power "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

Wow, Original Intent was a pretty broad field on which to play ball, wasn't it, Jack?

[JulieSmithXIV]

I like Socialism.

No SIHT ... from your posting I would have never pegged you as member of Team Goberment

Having watch the "Libertarian" Right attempt to destroy this nation over the last decade has actually pushed me further to the Left.

Booosh had no Libertarian bones in his body .. Do you believe everything you write?

The harder you fight for your bizarre notion of "freedom" the more reactionaries like myself you create.

Why is freedom such a bizarre notion to you?

[kranfid]

Booosh had no Libertarian bones in his body .. Do you believe everything you write?

Every time you post some retarded nickname for a president, whatever argument you were trying to make comes off as bullsh!t. Well that and your using blogs as source material (when you bother to cite references).

And do you believe everything you write?

The harder you fight for your bizarre notion of "freedom" the more reactionaries like myself you create.

See how one word can change the whole sentence?

[SergeyMaikov]

Every time you post some retarded nickname for a president, whatever argument you were trying to make comes off as bullsh!t. Well that and your using blogs as source material (when you bother to cite references).

And do you believe everything you write?

Nice way to deflect his quote and my question


You obviously need to complete 5th grade English. Your comprehension sucks. This is what Morley said:

See how one word can change the whole sentence? He is an admitted fabien socialist who doesn't like freedom .. freedom is a bizarre notion for him .. carry on with insults ... no reason or debate

[AnneseeKels]

Nice way to deflect his quote and my question

Your question was as stupid as your calling Bush "Boosh". Come back with the guy's real name and maybe people will take you more seriously than some zerohedge reading moron who doesn't know the presidents any better than he understands the way law-making works in this country.

Just sayin...

He is an admitted fabien socialist who doesn't like freedom .. freedom is a bizarre notion for him .. carry on with insults and no reason or debate This goes back to your reading comprehension. It sucks. That's not an insult, it's a fact. A person types one thing and you read something completely different.

Learn to respond to what people type and then come back.

[ppaelkos]

Your question was as stupid as your calling Bush "Boosh". Come back with the guy's real name and maybe people will take you more seriously than some zerohedge reading moron who doesn't know the presidents any better than he understands the way law-making works in this country.

Just sayin...

Is this another way to deflect the topic of Booosh being a Libertarian.

You are obsessing & questioning my knowledge of presidents, law-making, etc .. why not question Morley instead (I know the fraternal order of Socialists)... In what world is GW referred to as a Libertarian?

I find you obsession w/ me complementary & entertaining so please carry on

This goes back to your reading comprehension. It sucks. That's not an insult, it's a fact. A person types one thing and you read something completely different.

Learn to respond to what people type and then come back.

Should I list your insults .. which I don't mind! I'm just pointing out that insults are the last refuge of someone who really doesn't have much to say

[BakerBonce]

Every time you post some retarded nickname for a president, whatever argument you were trying to make comes off as bullsh!t. Well that and your using blogs as source material (when you bother to cite references).

Obviously you are referring to my zerohedge chart ...

Riddle me this - Was GDP for QTR1 revised down to .4%?

How did that argument come off as BS?

[Garry Hovard]

No SIHT ... from your posting I would have never pegged you as member of Team Goberment

The notion that the government is anagonistic to your way of life is one of the most pernicious and (it turns out, dangerous) lies ever sold. While it might be extremely satisifing to you, Jack, as you feel the need to have a huge, faceless enemy to fight, you and your ilk are really ruining it for the rest of us.

Booosh had no Libertarian bones in his body .. Do you believe everything you write? Who or what is "Booosh"? Make sense, man!

Why is freedom such a bizarre notion to you? You're putting words into my mouth. As has been pointed out, I said, "your bizarre notion of 'freedom'". By that, I means the one in which a the only measure of freedom is how little of what you perceive as "government instrusion" into your life there is. That -simply- is not the only definition of freedom going.

[exchpaypalgold]

Is this another way to deflect the topic of Booosh being a Libertarian.

This is exactly why I keep calling you stupid (other than your inability to spell).

You are obsessing & questioning my knowledge of presidents, law-making, etc .. why not question Morley instead (I know the fraternal order of Socialists)... In what world is GW referred to as a Libertarian? You've demonstrated in several threads that you don't understand the law making process. That's mildly understandable since most Americans don't understand it either, and many just scream 'RAAARRR CONSTITUTIONSZZZ!!' and chant nonsense about Founding Fathers. You take your ignorance to new levels by laying blame every time anything happens in DC.

I find you obsession w/ me complementary & entertaining so please carry on You start more threads in this section than any 2 people combined. Hard not to read your sewage and it's like watching a train wreck.

Should I list your insults .. which I don't mind! I'm just pointing out that insults are the last refuge of someone who really doesn't have much to say You've failed to respond every time I've torn apart your weak and pathetic arguments. It's your tactic to ask some moronic question instead of quoting the person properly and responding to what they've said.

That's why I prefer to just call you a dumbass

[FinanseMikky]

This is exactly why I keep calling you stupid (other than your inability to spell).

LMFAO @ your inability to answer a question .... is it just that you dont have much to say

You've demonstrated in several threads that you don't understand the law making process. That's mildly understandable since most Americans don't understand it either, and many just scream 'RAAARRR CONSTITUTIONSZZZ!!' and chant nonsense about Founding Fathers. You take your ignorance to new levels by laying blame every time anything happens in DC. Do you get upset at all the people that you do not agree with ...& LMFAO @ not understanding the law making process I would love to see where I have demonstrated that... is this that fraternal order again? ... Or is that you believe it is governments job to keep US on track and I believe it is the peoples job to do that


You've failed to respond every time I've torn apart your weak and pathetic arguments. It's your tactic to ask some moronic question instead of quoting the person properly and responding to what they've said.

That's why I prefer to just call you a dumbass WTF are you talking abt ... Show me one thread where you have torn me apart as it pertains to public policy or economics .. You HAVE IGNORED EVERYTHING I WROTE and critiqued my spelling of Booosh.

I know Im a scared racist so I call him Barry instead of using the name Barack and all that other crap blah, blah, blah... your whole schict is to insult b/ you are absent of reason or debate .. You have yet to "tear apart" one post in this thread but if you sleep better at night ...

[chuecafresss]

AND you smell like dingleberries. So there!

[gydrorway]

Which Founding Fathers, Jack? The ones who wrote that the union was "perpetual" and that "Every State shall abide by the determination of the united States in congress assembled"?

Or he ones who wrote that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Or the ones that wrote "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Or the ones that write that Congress has the power "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

Wow, Original Intent was a pretty broad field on which to play ball, wasn't it, Jack?

Does it really matter at this point?

.

[IrrettelatWet]

Does it really matter at this point?

.

Yes, it does, as if you're going to argue starting from the lie that the Founding Father's were States Righters, we're going to call you on it.

[HakTaisanip]

Yes, it does, as if you're going to argue starting from the lie that the Founding Father's were States Righters, we're going to call you on it.

LMFAO ... yep they all had the philosophy of Hamilton ....

hope you aren't using dial up ... you may miss one of you numerous calls to get polled .. please help me choose my 6 powerball numbers



Anyway ... does it really matter at this point?

[Rqqneujr]

LMFAO ... yep they all had the philosophy of Hamilton ....

Didn't say that. That would be as big a lie as your notion that they were all States Righters. The reality is you had Jefferson and Hamilton at the extremes and the rest in two groups in the middle, pretty much evenly split.

Nice try, though.

hope you aren't using dial up ... you may miss one of you numerous calls to get polled .. please help me choose my 6 powerball numbers Dial-up? Prople still use dial-up? I've had DSL for almost a decade.

Here are your numbers: 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, & 42

Anyway ... does it really matter at this point? Two answers for that:

Yes, it obviously matters as you keep fighting to sell your lie that the solution to all our problems is a return to the Articles of Confederacy.

Or: yes, it matters, because you've been caught trying to extract yourself from a trap of your own creation. Again.

Either way, it's fun to watch you squirm.