LOGO
USA Economy
USA economic debate

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-07-2011, 06:29 PM   #1
mikajuise

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
529
Senior Member
Default
Just that the tape was a certain brand that was also found in the Anthony home. That's why the defense tried to pin it on the grandfather. But there was no other evidence that connected him to the crime. There was no DNA of anyone on anything (even Caylee), aside from the little piece (not even a full profile) from one of the forensic examiners on the duct tape. Also, she was dumped with several items from the home - blanket, laundry bag, etc - so it's not like it could be a stranger.
but ultimately there was no evidence connecting Casey to the crime either. It could have been her mother, it could have been her father. it could have been a neighbor. it could have been her brother. and without a cause of death what proof is there that it wasnt' accidental? the tape? maybe it was an accident and whomever was responsible tried to make it look like a kidnap/murder?[/QUOTE]
mikajuise is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity