USA Politics ![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I heard that Bush will make agreement with India and transfer some nuclear energy... and India has over 20 atom bombs.
and you just stucked on iran. i don't believe bush, i don't believe his stupit policies... the people who supports him are dumbs.. it's so clear. As long as these double standards rule the world, i'm gonna support Iran about nuclear activities. If USA does not let any country to have nuclear power; then i support this. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
So, are you trying to equate India and Iran? No double standards there. The cooperation is in the commercial, not military, nuclear work. And the agreement signed specifically separates it from the millitary-related work and brings it under international inspections. -not military, just commercial.. oh yeah mama... millitary-related work and brings it under international inspections why should i believe this? how can i believe? inspections and incspectors are managed by USA. why should i believe all of these bulsh... that's the problem |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
so? is it a guarantie for them to don'w attack? they have like 20 atom bombs... so??? what are atom bombs for? sooo? so?? so? They already have them and they show no obvious intent to use them for any purpose other than deterrence. They have real energy demands that have to be considered. Would you rather they embrace the OPEC states? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Serdar,
Why are you so concerened? India is buying tens of billions of $$$ of oil & gas from Iran. Iran can use this money to build its own bombs. Correction. India has over 100 deployed atom bombs included boosted fission weapons. The figure of 20 is for those pesky Pakistanis and gulf countries. The rest is reserved for our friends in China. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
Serdar, About the Chine. some theoristes are saying like "USA is trying to take India his side against China". I still prefer India to be in China's side. India is in the same area hundreds of years, same neighbord and close relations. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Serdar, Can USA detect a nuclear weapon factory under the ground? like 500m or 1 km down under the ground? In any case, Turkey is a signatory to the NPT & CTBT - it can not develop nuclear weapons. It is in NATO which provides it a nuclear umbrella. Can you please help me to figure out Frances situation? |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Designing a workable bomb is not that hard. Making a reliable one is hard. In fact workable designs are so well understood that we don't have to test them anymore. Rail-gun designs like the Hiroshima bomb are very well documented and you could with some physics background pick a lot of the parameters off a table. Now collecting enough fissile material and machining and engineering the device even a crude device is much harder. But you would end up with is entirely functional. If you had the material you could build a device in the 8-15kt range and it would be deliverable somehow. Whether by truck or plane or cargo ship. Since these kinds of devices aren't really intended to stand off in an inventory one doesn't need sophisticatd PALs (passive access locks) those highly secure cryptographic ignition control switches that serve as fail-safe devices. Now ideally one wants to air drop a small warhead and have it detonate about 300-400 meters above ground but if that's not possible and it's a ground burst - the effective blast radius would still be pretty large.
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|