[nobodyhere]

In the last year, we have seen the leftist extremists in the Senate try to pin "racism" or "bigotry" on two judges who simply didn't have them. And the Democrats weren't trying to find out WHETHER those candidates were racists or not. They were trying to convince everyone that they WERE racists and bigots, even if they weren't. The truth about John Roberts or Samuel Alito didn't matter to them - only the opportunity to smear law-abiding judges mattered.

And their hearings were relatively benign, as hearings of originalist nominees go. Compare them to the treatment Democrats gave two other eminently-qualified originalists, Clarence Thomas and Robert Bork. Paying no attention to the superior qualities of either man, the Democrats did everything they could to personally destroy them. They were uninterested in putting a man on the Court who could wisely and correctly judge Constitutional issues, as both candidates plainly could. Rather they could see nothing beyond the candidate's likelihood of overturning various wrongly-decided cases that happen to support the liberal agenda, such as Kelo, Roe v. Wade, US v. Miller and others. They are desperate to keep judges on the bench who will allow those warped decisions to stand, regardless of the harm done to Constitutional jurisprudence in the process.

These Democrats are no friend of the U.S. Constitution. Rather than supporting it as every Federal officeholder should (and many are sworn to do), their intent is to get around it, and put their own liberal Nanny-state agenda in place despite the Constitution's clear bans on many parts of it.

In the last several months, we have seen two strong Constitutional judges weather the storm of the Democrats' destruction derby. When the leftists are faced with the loss of even more of their dwindling cadre of anti-constitutional supporters from the bench, how will they react when their pro-constitutionalist replacements are in the hot seat?

As Democrat desperation mounts, how far will they go, in their fanatical desire to preserve the unconstitutionl Nanny-state agenda they have managed to slip through the courts for the last 70+ years?

[sharpyure]

OK, we should just ignore someone's resume when it shows they were a member of a Club that would not allow black people or women....ok.

[idobestbuyonlinepp]

OK, we should just ignore someone's resume when it shows they were a member of a Club that would not allow black people or women....ok.

Not at all. If Hillary, for example, becomes the Dem nominee for President in 2008, I fully expect the Democrats to give her just as much grief and smear her just as heavily as they did Alito, for going for FOUR YEARS to a college (Wellesley) that forbids men entirely, regardless of how well academically qualified they are.

Don't you?

.

[Fdhwzctl]

Not at all. If Hillary, for example, becomes the Dem nominee for President in 2008, I fully expect the Democrats to give her just as much grief and smear her just as heavily as they did Alito, for going for FOUR YEARS to a college (Wellesley) that forbids men entirely, regardless of how well academically qualified they are.

Don't you?

.

That is only the tip of the iceberg for Hildebeast.
She also lived in the "lesbian dorm" - a nearby house that was known all over the campus as the place to live if you are lesbian.
She is still close friends with one women in particular from back then, that same women lived in Arkansas when Bill was govenor...and moved to Washington D.C. - when he became President...she also flew with Hillary when she campaigned for Bill and for herself as Senator.

[Mqcawkzd]

That is only the tip of the iceberg for Hildebeast.
She also lived in the "lesbian dorm" - a nearby house that was known all over the campus as the place to live if you are lesbian.
She is still close friends with one women in particular from back then, that same women lived in Arkansas when Bill was govenor...and moved to Washington D.C. - when he became President...she also flew with Hillary when she campaigned for Bill and for herself as Senator.

Cone now, seriously. This just speaks for the Senator's open-mindedness and her support for diversity. The only problem with Clinton's past is her refusal to excersize her Right To Choose when she was suffered from a fetus infection.

[xtrudood]

The only problem with Clinton's past is her refusal to excersize her Right To Choose when she was suffered from a fetus infection.

She did exorsize her right to choose and chose life, same as what I choose. Don't get me wrong, Hillary is EXTREMELY incompetent, that goes without saying, I mean, isn't 2 terms of Hillary Clinton as president really enough? Look what they did to the country, we're still trying to recover from "Clintonomics"

[User-Luser]

That is only the tip of the iceberg for Hildebeast.
She also lived in the "lesbian dorm" - a nearby house that was known all over the campus as the place to live if you are lesbian.
She is still close friends with one women in particular from back then, that same women lived in Arkansas when Bill was govenor...and moved to Washington D.C. - when he became President...she also flew with Hillary when she campaigned for Bill and for herself as Senator.

What's wrong with living in a dorm that has a lot of lesbians? Or having a lesbian friend? There are a lot of gays on this site too, iam. You've probably even talked to some! Oh nos!!!!

[Numbiydq]

OK, we should just ignore someone's resume when it shows they were a member of a Club that would not allow black people or women....ok.

I kind of hope you're kidding about that post. It's making a mountain out of a mole-hill.

[Assungusa]

She did exorsize her right to choose and chose life, same as what I choose. Don't get me wrong, Hillary is EXTREMELY incompetent, that goes without saying, I mean, isn't 2 terms of Hillary Clinton as president really enough? Look what they did to the country, we're still trying to recover from "Clintonomics"

Man what are you talking about. The was humming and now it has crashed under two terms of Bush rule. If you're lucky Bush will be impeached and the country will be saved by Hillary or some other Democrat.

From your post it would indicate that you think America is going in the right direction or something.

[Kolovorotkes]

Well look, Democrats don't have much going for them and Alito represents defeat for the liberals. Liberals are born liars and thieves, so it should not surprise anyone that they would lie about Alito.
We have a Black Caucus in the Congress that only admits Blacks and only addresses black problems as if the rest of America does not matter.
We have the racist organization NAACP, which Democrats support with a passion, so Democrats have in reality nothing to say about being exclusionary or racist. The Democrats are the ultimate race whores.
Now it turns out Americans are becoming fed up with their antics and their amoral philosophy. Americans don't trust Democrats to defend America and that is a serious rope around their necks.
Alito will be confirmed and that is a huge, huge victory for George Bush.
All we need now is for one of the other liberal judges to resign or drop dead and that will spell the end of legislation from the bench, of forcing issues by court order when they can't win their way with votes.
Next time around Bush needs to nominate a real firebrand right-winger and just force the confirmation by way of the Republican majority.
Majority rules, voters don't like Democrats so they need to get the hell out of the way.

[aspinswramymn]

Man what are you talking about. The was humming and now it has crashed under two terms of Bush rule. If you're lucky Bush will be impeached and the country will be saved by Hillary or some other Democrat.

From your post it would indicate that you think America is going in the right direction or something.

What have the Democrats ever saved? I guess Bill Clinton saved the nuclear secrets long enough to sell them to China. He also really did well in trying to stop Bin Laden, especially when the man was actually in our crosshairs. he ruined the economy, while riding on the prosperity that we got from 2 terms of Ronald Reagan and one term of George H. W. Bush. All throughout this, he managed to lie under oath, and conduct himself very unprofessionally with an intern.

So, let me ask you this, if America isn't going in the right direction with our current and honorable President, we all know that Hillary would probably cause the appocolypse because we all know she is incompetent. What lib will save you, Ted Kennedy?? Maybe, if he can crawl out of that scotch bottle long enough, but I doubt it.

[mArVHDO6]

OK, we should just ignore someone's resume when it shows they were a member of a Club that would not allow black people or women....ok.

Sort of like Ted Kennedy's CURRENT membership in a club that forbids women? The one that he said he would quit as soon as he could (yeah, right). And this is the Ted Kennedy that was making a big deal out of it? Hypocrite does not even BEGIN to describe Kennedy.

[ThzinChang]

Spad, you guys bring up something that Clinton did wrong when we complain that Bush broke the law. You bring up some club that Kennedy is in when we complain that the next SCJ put a racist sexist club on his resume to get a job in the Reagan WH. Do you think that it makes it OK because some Democrat did a scummy or dishonest or wrong thing too?

Is this the way you justify someone being less than right for the job? Because someone else is also not so great? I would have thought you would have a better argument than that...

[qCGfQR9T]

Just pointing out hypocrisy when I see it. You can't complain that our side when yours is every bit as bad, and Saint Blow-Job was one of the worst snake-oil salesmen ever. Only the truly gullible believed a word he said.

You don't like spying, but his FBI files on his opponents was OK?

[Investblogger]

If Clinton had someone spied on, he went through FISA or whatever legal means he needed to go through. At least he didn't break the law when he spied on Americans. At least he didn't proclaim himself to be above the law. If he broke the law, he would have been hung out to dry during the millions of dollars worth of investigations into every little thing he ever did. All they found was some oral sex.

You might want to think about focusing on the politician in question and stop consistantly bringing up Clinton or Kennedy. Maybe it would be better to focus on the present issue at hand and leave the past behind us. Everytime a politician breaks the law in the Bush admin, we don't need to compare his crime to something someone else did in the past. We need to focus and get our government to stop breaking the law. They shouldn't be forgiven just because someone else also did something wrong. Just because someone gets away with murdering your neighbor, should another killer get away with murdering you?

[bensabath]

Him having FBI files was against the law.

I know for a fact that after Bush is gone, you will be blaming him for things 'til the end of time. Slick didn't get the name Slick because he was honest.