LOGO
USA Politics
USA political debate

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-25-2008, 02:36 AM   #1
Calluffence

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default Change, Hope and the Future of America
CHANGE, HOPE AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICA


I’m voting for Obama, but with misgivings.

Now his refreshing newness has worn off, I can see the politician beneath. Reined in by his handlers, he now rarely proposes anything specific, and you can no longer tell what he believes –and maybe by now he can’t either. “Change” and “Hope” –once fervently felt-- have devolved to campaign buzzwords.

His handlers must like that. He has to be elected, after all, and isn’t that really a question of not making mistakes the press and public will pounce on? If you don’t say anything controversial, there’s nothing to pounce on.

The country’s never been so broken in my lifetime, and we’re in desperate need of change; but the change needs to be specifically called out, clear and goal-directed to give us hope. But most of all it needs to be the product of courage, because what needs to be done by the next president will not be popular.

OK, so maybe he needs to keep mum about his planned actions and beliefs until after he’s elected; it looks like it’ll be a close race. So the campaign itself can avoid substance and content itself with questions about McCain’s houses. Maybe that’s what you have to do to get into the position where you can do some good.

What worries me is: will he get so used to believing next to nothing that he’ll neglect to accomplish what we’ll have elected him to do: fix the country, help fix the world.

It’s after his inauguration that he’ll need to embark upon that course, and it’s then he’ll need the courage.

Maybe we could feed him a courage potion so he’d be willing to make proposals unpopular with some of the electorate.

Here’s a list. It's technical, it's urgent, folks won't like it, and it needs to be accomplished:

1. Pull all troops out of Iraq immediately.
2. Make friends with Russia by:

a. pulling our newly-installed “defensive” missiles out of Poland and the Czech Republic;
b. arranging to buy gazillion barrels of Russian oil to replace the petroleum we’ll no longer get from Iraq (Putin and cronies will love this one, and so will Mayfair realtors. The price of top-rank London condos doubles.).

3. In return, the Russians promise to stop selling arms and nuclear aid to Iran, and …
4. We, in turn cut off arms shipments to Saudi Arabia. We leave the royal family to the tender mercies of Osama bin Laden, who returns in triumph as spiritual leader of the newly-minted Islamic Republic of Saudi Arabia. He agrees to call off his boys if we pressure the Israelis to make peace with Palestine by letting them have their half of Jerusalem. The Israelis dismantle the fence around Gaza.

Meanwhile, on the home front, Barack moves fast to:

1. get some Americans into vehicles that don’t add CO2 to the atmosphere and…
2. get other Americans out of their cars entirely for their trips to work.

To accomplish the former, Barack unpopularly launches a program to build 100 nuclear powerplants in wilderness areas downwind from population centers. While these are designed and constructed, GM, Ford, Chrysler and all foreign carmakers queue up for licenses to build Ratan Tata’s car that runs on compressed air. America’s suburban houses and service stations are equipped with air compressors. You plug in your car and fill the tank with compressed air. Zero emissions at the tailpipe and zero emissions at the power plant.

To accomplish the second goal, Obama overlays all existing zoning with a separate Federally-mandated category that basically allows genuinely urban, walkable development (buildings that touch, mixed use, no surface parking lots) to occur wherever there is zoning that is not agricultural or wilderness. This means you can build Greenwich Village anywhere you can build Chappaqua.

At first, this is deeply unpopular with residents of Scarsdale, Huntington and East Orange, who fear inundation by knife-wielding crack dealers. Since it’s proposed in the first week of Obama’s term, he figures developers can get some of this stuff built before he has to run for re-election. To expedite construction, the Feds mandate a drastically streamlined approval process. Obama appoints Leon Krier to the newly-created post of Secretary of Urban Development. When the folks in Staten Island discover how convenient and pleasant it has become to walk to the corner store, they mute their opposition.

The building code, presently at 1350 pages, is edited down to 80 pages of essentials, and every addition to it must be accompanied by a deletion of equal length.

Developers jump enthusiastically aboard, construction delays are a thing of the past, and land values become a smaller part of the cost of developing a dwelling unit.

Little inhabited town centers appear like raisins in the pound cake of Suburbia. Now the country’s humming with construction activity as suburbia gradually morphs into urban patterns. Planners start the process of connecting these centers via networks of light rail.

Agriculture revives and food prices go down; as Suburbia recedes, arable land makes a comeback, and farming pays better than selling out to developers. Television broadcasts the spectacle of a subdivision actually being bulldozed to create a farm.

Money is now being invested on a Chinese scale as the whole country pitches in at an accelerated rate to rebuild. New infrastructure springs up: high-speed train lines, long-needed ocean crossings made possible by advances in suspension bridge design and tunneling techniques.

Naturally, the government raises taxes –especially at upper income levels—but folks mostly don’t mind because they can see where the money is going, and there’s a new-found camaraderie to the national spirit, a consensus, a feeling of solidarity and patriotism without jingoism. As a byproduct of the tax increase, the national debt is paid off from its present trillion.

Rivalry with China is back-burnered by both nations, as a constant series of treaties strengthen trade ties, co-operation, shared technology and a feeling of mutual destiny.

The minimum wage is raised to a level where a full-time worker can keep a roof overhead, and the price of a Big Mac goes up by a quarter.

In Obama’s second term, the constitution is amended to allow up to four terms.


* * *

After everyone points out all aspects of this plan that are impossible, you'll know exactly why there's no hope for the future.


.
Calluffence is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 03:53 AM   #2
rolex-buy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
help fix the world.
Please, we're fine, fix the miriad of problems at home first.
rolex-buy is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 03:59 AM   #3
pirinosa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
^ Global warming's a transnational dilemma, and the U.S. has to shift from problem to solution.
pirinosa is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 04:36 AM   #4
beriarele

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
333
Senior Member
Default
Agreed but that's not helping fix the world so much as stop destroying it.
beriarele is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 02:12 PM   #5
Frannypaync

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
^ Have to start somewhere.
Frannypaync is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 02:23 PM   #6
Xiciljed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
It all sounds great. And add full health care coverage as a right, so everyone can relax a bit and feel truly secure.
Xiciljed is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 04:28 PM   #7
PrareeLor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
^ That would result in an immediate increase in U.S. life expectancy --now at a shameful 47th in the world, despite having the world's best doctors and hospitals.
PrareeLor is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 05:21 PM   #8
AnneseeKels

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
571
Senior Member
Default
Wouldn't it also free companies from paying for their workers? Imagine if a company like GM did not have the weight of health care.
AnneseeKels is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 05:53 PM   #9
poekfpojoibien

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
^ That would result in an immediate increase in U.S. life expectancy --now at a shameful 47th in the world, despite having the world's best doctors and hospitals.
Read the introduction:
books.google.com/books?isbn=1586484818
poekfpojoibien is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 06:13 PM   #10
nuabuncarnigo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
In Obama’s second term, the constitution is amended to allow up to four terms.


* * *

After everyone points out all aspects of this plan that are impossible, you'll know exactly why there's no hope for the future.


.
It's an interesting exercise in day dreaming.

OK. If I understand this correctly, We all get to live like fire ants in high density areas, while big corperations gobble up the rest of the land for agriculture?

I think you will have to do more than ammend the constitution. You'll have to scrap the sucker!

......And, and, and, you might bleed to death after Meryl Streep cuts your n#!$ off for building those nuke plants!
nuabuncarnigo is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 06:29 PM   #11
KinicsBonee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
We can send Meryl on a tour of France :

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf40.html
KinicsBonee is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 06:44 PM   #12
Licacivelip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
... with a one way ticket?
Licacivelip is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 09:45 PM   #13
Tryphadz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
OK. If I understand this correctly, We all get to live like fire ants in high density areas...
Not all of us. Some of us. Just like before the car.

Like much of Europe.

while big corperations gobble up the rest of the land for agriculture? Who said anything about big corporations? Some people like to farm.

......And, and, and, you might bleed to death after Meryl Streep cuts your n#!$ off for building those nuke plants! Two nuclear accidents in forty years produced about as many deaths as occur globally in a week of traffic accidents. I think we should either ban driving altogether or reduce the speed limit to 5mph. Think of all the lives we'd save!
Tryphadz is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 09:50 PM   #14
FilmCriticAwezume

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Nukes are a stopgap. Until they harness fusion, we should not depend on something this volatile, expensive and utterly useless after it has run its course (it is not like we can just tear down the plant and put something else up once we find the Wunder-Fuel.).


I am beginning to hate this election more and more the more I see the ads from both sides. Makes me want to put on a Gi and beat the living daylights out of some of these "reporters".
FilmCriticAwezume is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 10:34 PM   #15
EmxATW5m

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Agreed but that's not helping fix the world so much as stop destroying it.
Nero's bust in your picture?
EmxATW5m is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 10:35 PM   #16
beloveds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
591
Senior Member
Default
^ That would result in an immediate increase in U.S. life expectancy --now at a shameful 47th in the world, despite having the world's best doctors and hospitals.
Lower life expectancy is probably more attributable to the average American diet and sedentary lifestyle (obesity) than the care they receive towards the end.

The biggest problem we face is within ourselves. How can we hope to clean up our government (or for any President or Congress to "fix" things) until we've looked in the mirror, acknowledged our problems, made personal choices to address them and demanded that our elected officials do the same. A large percentage of the country is uninformed, uncaring, distracted or simply asleep at the wheel. And then there is a sizable segment that is ready, willing and very able to take advantage of this circumstance for pecuniary gain.
beloveds is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 10:35 PM   #17
induffike

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Nukes are a stopgap. Until they harness fusion, we should not depend on something this volatile, expensive and utterly useless after it has run its course.
All not true. Nuclear fuel can be reprocessed, nuclear power is not expensive and is the only way to address global warming in the short term. Nuclear power in the US is very safe.
induffike is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 10:40 PM   #18
topbonusescod

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
Lower life expectancy is probably more attributable to the average American diet and sedentary lifestyle (obesity)
Not so. Ablarc is right, the absence of universal health care is definitely a factor. It was observed that when US citizens get Medicare at 65, their life expectancy goes up.
topbonusescod is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 10:47 PM   #19
nryFBa9i

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
Lower life expectancy is probably more attributable to the average American diet and sedentary lifestyle (obesity) than the care they receive towards the end.
Consider too the importance of health care at the begining of life. Also: the importance of available regular check-ups. The importance of finding and treating diseases early.

------

Re:Nuclear: worth noting too: France can build from start to finish, a nuclear power plant in 5 years. And since the advent of Nuclear power decades ago, there have been huge advances in safety and technology.

---
nryFBa9i is offline


Old 08-25-2008, 10:58 PM   #20
r9tbayfC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
Nero's bust in your picture?
Augustus
r9tbayfC is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity