LOGO
USA Politics
USA political debate

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-10-2007, 08:16 PM   #1
SawbasyWrab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default Gay "Devastation" of the Enemy
Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'

Hank Plante
Reporting

(CBS 5) BERKELEY A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting.

Pentagon officials on Friday confirmed to CBS 5 that military leaders had considered, and then subsquently rejected, building the so-called "Gay Bomb."

Edward Hammond, of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, had used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of the proposal from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

As part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."

The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon.

"The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soliders to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistably attractive to one another," Hammond said after reviwing the documents.

"The notion was that a chemical that would probably be pleasant in the human body in low quantities could be identified, and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical, the notion was that soliders would become gay," explained Hammond.

The Pentagon told CBS 5 that the proposal was made by the Air Force in 1994.

"The Department of Defense is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform," said a DOD spokesperson, who indicated that the "gay bomb" idea was quickly dismissed.

However, Hammond said the government records he obtained suggest the military gave the plan much stronger consideration than it has acknowledged.

"The truth of the matter is it would have never come to my attention if it was dismissed at the time it was proposed," he said. "In fact, the Pentagon has used it repeatedly and subsequently in an effort to promote non-lethal weapons, and in fact they submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider."

Military officials insisted Friday to CBS 5 that they are not currently working on any such idea and that the past plan was abandoned.

Gay community leaders in California said Friday that they found the notion of a "gay bomb" both offensive and almost laughable at the same time.

"Throughout history we have had so many brave men and women who are gay and lesbian serving the military with distinction," said Geoff Kors of Equality California. "So, it's just offensive that they think by turning people gay that the other military would be incapable of doing their job. And its absurd because there's so much medical data that shows that sexual orientation is immutable and cannot be changed."

(© MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)


http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_159222541.html
SawbasyWrab is offline


Old 06-10-2007, 09:01 PM   #2
snislarne

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
Why don't the Pentagon folks just develop a "bomb" that makes everyone more interested in peace than in war?

Then drop some on everyone -- themselves included.
snislarne is offline


Old 06-10-2007, 09:10 PM   #3
FelikTen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
I've had a lot of luck with this:


Negroni Cocktail

- 5 ounces dry gin
- 5 ounces campari
- 5 ounces sweet vermouth
- Orange twists

In a cocktail shaker, combine gin, campari, and vermouth. Shake gently. Pour over ice into a large chilled cocktail glass. Twist the orange peel to release the juices and add to the drink.
FelikTen is offline


Old 06-10-2007, 09:17 PM   #4
ultimda horaf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
This is a new Austin Powers movie, right?
ultimda horaf is offline


Old 06-11-2007, 04:45 AM   #5
11Pecepebra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
A bomb that turns everyone gay? My god - i should be so lucky.
11Pecepebra is offline


Old 06-11-2007, 07:12 AM   #6
Erexecike

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
I guess the government endorses the scientific findings that "homosexuality" is not a choice but rather a genetic trait. You'd think they'd drop a "straight" bomb on all the folks failing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

Your tax dollars at work.
Erexecike is offline


Old 06-11-2007, 07:38 PM   #7
tramadoldiscountes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
"Irresistibly attracted to one another" is the funny part.
tramadoldiscountes is offline


Old 06-11-2007, 07:41 PM   #8
chechokancho

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
Doesn't Ecstasy do the same thing?
chechokancho is offline


Old 06-11-2007, 07:44 PM   #9
JanetMorris

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
Awesome!

Ok I have a hard time believing this would have worked.
JanetMorris is offline


Old 06-11-2007, 08:49 PM   #10
Britfunclubs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
361
Senior Member
Default
Interesting comments from Jack Valero of Opus Dei:

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/opinion/2005-1467.html
Britfunclubs is offline


Old 06-12-2007, 06:44 PM   #11
myhackingtosh_ws

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
a gay bomb??? Now I really heard of everything...
myhackingtosh_ws is offline


Old 06-13-2007, 05:16 PM   #12
HugoSimon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
If a bomb can make "gay" a casualty of war, can gays and lesbians apply for disability pay with the US government?
HugoSimon is offline


Old 06-13-2007, 08:06 PM   #13
gypearteday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
The bomb itself would not be a "gay" bomb.

For one, it would not dress fashionably or have any clue about social interaction, but that is another topic entirely.


The thing is, the idgits, looking for something easy to remember it, called it this.

My bet is that they were looking for a F-Bomb. Something that would make the soldiers so randy that they would jump just about anything that was breathing. Would that be disruptive? Definitely. Would they be more "attracted" in more than a sense to get their rocks off? Doubtful.

Homosexuality SEEMS to be an ingrained trait that is either enforced or deterred by environment. Simply spraying someone with Channel #69 will not make someone spend more time in the Meat Packing district.

I am sorry, I meant to say Chelsea. Why would I say Meat Packing?
gypearteday is offline


Old 06-13-2007, 11:48 PM   #14
LomodiorCon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
hmmmm ...

Homokaasu ...

(Finnish name, literally gay-gas) is a fictitious poisonous chemical substance, that is supposedly an odorless and invisible gas at room temperature. It is a Finnish urban legend, and is often the subject of running gags on Finnish Usenet newsgroups.

Conspiracy theory

Homokaasu is supposedly used on specific people by secret agents of the Roman Catholic Church to gain a subliminal control of the victims ...
LomodiorCon is offline


Old 06-13-2007, 11:50 PM   #15
treawittelf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
The bomb that dare not speak its name

collision detection

The Sunshine Project is an activist group that studies the US government's research into chemical and biological weapons. They file lots of Freedom of Information requests, and one of their latest ones discovered something quite hilarious. Apparently, in 1994, the military considered a proposal to research a "gay bomb" that would make enemy soldiers "sexually irresistible" to each other. As the BBC notes:
The plan for a so-called "love bomb" envisaged an aphrodisiac chemical that would provoke widespread homosexual behaviour among troops, causing what the military called a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale.The military claims this proposal was immediately rejected, but the Sunshine Project says that it was still being pondered as late as 2001. I can't figure out who to believe. On the one hand, the idea is so laughable it would seem impossible anyone would take it seriously; then again, the military is so massively deranged about homosexuality that I can almost believe it.
treawittelf is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:21 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity